-
Posts
5,014 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Huddle Wiki
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by WarPanthers89
-
Point was about his deep ball. Young can make every pass in the book and nfl execs all agree he is the number one QB and it’s not close. Tomorrow will prove that. No one questions how great out coaching staff is….. and they will pick Young. I trust them over any opinion on this board, they are all tying their NFL careers on getting this right.
-
I salute you sir. Great point.
-
“Me and Frank got together to discuss our pick and it took less than 5 seconds…” -Scotty F. I trust them over anything you say. You find one guy who has a different opinion and use that as ammo, the vast majority of football EXPERTS (people actually employed by a team) all agree Young is head and shoulders number 1 QB in this draft. Tomorrow will prove it.
-
Will Levis #1 to the Panthers Confirmed
WarPanthers89 replied to tukafan21's topic in Carolina Panthers
The onion of the mock draft world. Again I am glad I am not a Mod on this board. This post would be instant ban. No laughing from me but I’ll still pie you anyway -
This is getting really bad. I feel my IQ dropping with each thread like this. It’s Young ladies and gents… stop wasting energy and accept this. If we don’t pick Young I will delete my account forever. This is a promise.
-
Precisely.
-
I’m glad I’m not a Mod. I would ban every person who believes this garbage just to make this board a better place.
-
It’s a way to get more bets in. If you believe this, I have an amazing blue chip penny stock that I would like to discuss with you. Zero chance he goes number one. I would bet my life on it.
-
You can’t find websites that have a huge following that believe the earth is flat. Don’t believe everything you read on the internet.
-
Where do you "rank" Burns as Panthers all-time DEs?
WarPanthers89 replied to TheBigKat's topic in Carolina Panthers
It’s hard to tell, he was misused his rookie year and only has 4 years under his belt. If he’s constant he can end up being top 2-3 but you are comparing people with full careers vs 4 years of production. In 4 years he has 2 less sacks than Greg Hardy did in his career. -
Article: Last December, the Panthers hosted the Lions in Week 16. It was the coldest home game in franchise history for Carolina. The resulting field conditions sparked a grievance from the NFL Players Association. In his recent column regarding the injury rates between grass and artificial surfaces, NFLPA president JC Tretter shared some of the details regarding the situation in Carolina from Christmas Eve. Per the union, the field at Bank of America Stadium had an unacceptable degree of hardness. “We currently have a single test for all field surfaces called the ‘Clegg’ test, which simply measures a field’s hardness,” Tretter explained. “While we are working diligently and collaboratively with the NFL’s engineering experts to devise more advanced ways to measure field performance and safety, this test is all that we currently have. However, even this simple measure was too much for the NFL to adhere to when push came to shove in Carolina. “Last year on Christmas Eve, Carolina’s field failed the Clegg test. For a surface to pass this test, it must measure below 100g (units of gravities), and the meter for this test goes up to a maximum of 150g. When the field in Carolina was tested during the pregame check, it came back as — you guessed it — 150g.” Tretter wrote that players in the Lions-Panthers game described the field as “concrete.” “Players reported that they couldn’t even wear cleats because they wouldn’t sink into the turf,” Tretter wrote. “When we reached out to the league, they told us they were aware of these concerns and were working to remedy them.” Tretter also complained that the league didn’t delay the game. “Afterward, the league told us that late in the first half, the field finally did fall below the 100g max,” Tretter wrote. “But the fact remains that the players in that game had to play on a field that the league acknowledges was not safe. That is beyond frustrating to players and unacceptable in the eyes of our union.” The NFL disagrees with the union’s characterization of the facts. “The union’s assertions are incorrect,” NFL head of health and safety and P.R. Jeff Miller said Thursday in a statement, via ESPN.com. “But we will make our arguments in the appropriate CBA-mandated grievance process, which is ongoing.” The fundamental reality is that the league can’t afford to delay or cancel regular-season games. While it has happened with preseason games, including the 2016 Hall of Fame game to a 2001 preseason game at Veteran Stadium between the Ravens and Eagles, the NFL doesn’t welcome the prospect of sending everyone home from a regular-season game and telling the network due to televise the contest, “Oops.” Especially when it comes to standalone national broadcasts. That’s the basic reality of any and all pregame checks or reviews. Unless the NFL would actually postpone or cancel the game, what’s the point of even doing it? Again, the pending grievance will resolve the situation from Charlotte in Week 16. If the NFLPA’s claims are accurate, hopefully appropriate action will be taken to make the league’s rules regarding field conditions something other than a box to be checked when everything is fine — and an inconvenient reality to be ignored when anything is amiss. https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2023/04/23/nflpa-field-at-carolina-in-week-16-maxed-out-the-hardness-scale/