kass

Had to look it up.. 122-120 at home and 97-144-1 away.

Sounds good. I also noticed the DE and DT might have been switched. Isn't Robinson more if a DE? But what about Cam Jackson, DT or DE. But I guess the front three is more fluid in reality than on paper and the DC don't like big DTs . But 5 is still a small number.

How unusual is it to only have 3 DE listed in a 3-4 scheme? And only 5 defensive lineman total. 7 WR and 4 TE... with Coker on IR. 🫠 Next draft they certainly will need to adress OL(OT depth), LB and DL (QB).

I wanted the team to pick him once the fell as he did. Just wrote about it in another thread. We had pick 140, 5th, he went 144. I thought giving BY this season was the right call.. not sure its logical. because after looking at the stats (right after the draft). Hm. Did it "match" with what we felt during the end of last year. Not really. So you might be correct with BY not deserving another year. Guess we will find out.

When Sanders fell to the 5th round, the team should have picked him with 140. "We need a backup 2026 when Daltons contract ends.".... But the intention to let him compete with the new first round QB pick 2026 if BY failed. If BY show up, could have traded Sanders for a cheerleader or whatever. 5th round is nothing. - There are no known potential franchise qbs on other teams depthchartz waiting to get an opportunity. Roll the dice on draft picks. Should pick a QB each year until you get it right..

I doubt that. If he doesn't show up and produce this season, he should be replaced. And I think most here agree with that. Everyone know his physical ability is limited. If his mental play can't overcome that in year 3, there is nothing there to hang on to. Mediocre QB play wont turn around this franchise.

He is a more long term solution, so definitely should be given chances.

The international service is run by Germans and they make their own commercial break and put it on repeat.

Don't know if I can watch more. Every commercial break, my service talks about a San Fran documentary pulling Montana for Steve Young and a QB controversy, then Micah P, and then maybe season opener with Rams.. and then some other boring generic European soccer clips. And repeat if the break is longer... Gah.. I prefer the US commercials. I want them. Bad.

I appreciate and agree with most of your posts, so almost by default have to disagree with some!

Ok, sure, might meet the definition of a contested catch. You know that better than me. but rewatching it, not like Stinglry affected the outcome of the play.

So, that's why you use the word contested. Really NFL open is also a term, this was more like high school open.

Game start at 19.00, same as most regular games. So time is perfect. Trash, yeah well this it the ~10 season now with this team so I'm kinda used to it

100% Agree that it could have been placed better. Contested? No. Go back and watch the play again. CB had to throw himself just to be able to touch the TE. With a better placed ball, wouldnt even need to "break a tackle" to gain YAC.

Do you guys also have Texans commentators? "Best in the league. Thats why you can't throw when.. best I'm league.." Dude, the TE dropped it. Stingley had 0% chance to touch the ball and did nothing on that play.