BR Post Draft Power Rankings

[pantherj]

While I don't think we're headed to another 12 win season by any means, this guy knows very little about our team needs. Unfortunately many sports writers know next to nothing about small market teams until they read a brief team summary before they write an article. He knew who we drafted, read that we went 12-4 last season, and then pulled out of nowhere that we reached throughout the draft. I actually expected him to do just that. He doesn't have to get the facts correct to keep his job. We all know he's wrong, and he doesn't give a poo.

[Frizzy350]

While I don't think we're headed to another 12 win season by any means, this guy knows very little about our team needs. Unfortunately many sports writers know next to nothing about small market teams until they read a brief team summary before they write an article. He knew who we drafted, read that we went 12-4 last season, and then pulled out of nowhere that we reached throughout the draft. I actually expected him to do just that. He doesn't have to get the facts correct to keep his job. We all know he's wrong, and he doesn't give a poo.

 

Don't mean to rain on you, but literally anyone can write a BR article.  All you need to do is sign up (it's free).  99% of the articles on there are not written by professional writers.  In fact most of it is written by people with less knowledge than most of us here.

 

22 is hilariously bad though.  I understand not predicting us to go 12-4 again but there is no reason to believe we can't at LEAST crack .500.  We have too talented a roster.

[Carolina Crazy V2]

Stop posting links to these poo articles. There are good B/R writers and then there are the other 90%. Quit linking to the crappy 90% because you're feeding into what they want: page hits. 

[Carolina Crazy V2]

Don't mean to rain on you, but literally anyone can write a BR article.  All you need to do is sign up (it's free).  99% of the articles on there are not written by professional writers.  In fact most of it is written by people with less knowledge than most of us here.

 

22 is hilariously bad though.  I understand not predicting us to go 12-4 again but there is no reason to believe we can't at LEAST crack .500.  We have too talented a roster.

 

Don't mean to rain on your parade, but not just anyone can write a B/R article. You have to apply to write and less than 15% of applicants are accepted. 

 

The only thing that's as annoying as crappy B/R writers are the ignorant B/R haters. Next time get your facts straight before you post or you're just as bad as the writer of that article. 

[Frizzy350]

Don't mean to rain on your parade, but not just anyone can write a B/R article. You have to apply to write and less than 15% of applicants are accepted. 

 

The only thing that's as annoying as crappy B/R writers are the ignorant B/R haters. Next time get your facts straight before you post or you're just as bad as the writer of that article. 

 

When did that happen?  it always advertised if you want to write just sign up. granted I don't frequent there often.

[PandaPancake]

Why do you fuging kids goto Bleacher Report? If you stop going they'll go away and we'll all be better off.

From what Kraken told me on Twitter he's going to play DE/QB which will lead to some kick ass modified wildcat plays.

Sent from my XT1080 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

[Carolina Crazy V2]

When did that happen?  it always advertised if you want to write just sign up. granted I don't frequent there often.

 

They say that, but there was always an application process. It used to be very easy to get in, but now you actually have to be literate. 

[Carolina Crazy V2]

Sadly, B/R is filled with Skip Baylesses that just have crap opinions that piss people off and get attention. The best writers on B/R get lost in the fold because their articles don't produce as many comments and attention as the crappy writers. 

 

That's why I advise people to follow any good writers on B/R and exclusively read their material. Otherwise, you're going to be fed a load of poo every time you click on some hyped up, front-page article. 

[pantherj]

Don't mean to rain on you, but literally anyone can write a BR article.  All you need to do is sign up (it's free).  99% of the articles on there are not written by professional writers.  In fact most of it is written by people with less knowledge than most of us here.

 

22 is hilariously bad though.  I understand not predicting us to go 12-4 again but there is no reason to believe we can't at LEAST crack .500.  We have too talented a roster.

 

This was in the author's about section: "I'm a husband, father of three and full time Bleacher Report writer."

 

[MedellinHeel]

We're going to get to see how good Cam really is this year.

We have a great defense, everyone know's that.

But I still maintain that we have one of those Patriot offenses that if it wasn't commanded by Brady it would be sh*t.

I want to see Cam take his game to elite status.

 

Did you see what Kassel did in Brady's absence? Or what Flynn did in Rodger's absence? 

 

OC's and system play a very large role in offense numbers and qb ratings. 

[jayflip]

Makes sense that Haplo E would agree with this BR crap.

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

[rayzor]

i was getting ready to write that bleacher report has gotten better in the last couple years since teaming up with i foget who at the moment and that they've actually started hiring some decent wrriters, but then i actually read the OP and decided it this wasn't the best moment to say that because it was avtually the same type of poo article by the same type of joke wannabe writer that made BR the poo site it got the reputation for being.

 

knocking our draft because we reached for need? did they even look to see what we did? i've been a bit critical of this draft (which i've just decided to accept and move on) but reaching for need is definitely not one of thise criticisms. benjamin and turner were drafted exactly where they should have been and ealy was drafted about a round later than he should have been. the last four picks....reaching? nobody knows where thise guys should have been picked, because its all a much bigger crapshoot than the first couple rounds are. we got safety and CB help, but i don't see either guy as having been reaches and they didn't exactly fill out our roster as much as added to the competition. and the stanford RB probably would have been drafted.  good bit earlier in another era where RBs weren't so devalue.

 

the only place where we need the roster filled out and where we probably would have benefitted from "reaching" is OT and we absolutely did not do that. 

 

so yeah.....pretty much the same BR article we grew to hate/laugh at.

[wade]

I still remember Billick having the Panthers at 28th in his preseason power rankings last year and Peter King predicting a 6-10 record (which would have been good for the worst record in the NFC).