Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hayward, Monroe, Love All Options Hornets Look To Explore


Recommended Posts

They’ll explore how to add another game-changer to center Al Jefferson. So I take it for granted they’ll check what it might take to acquire power forward Kevin Love, who seemingly wants out of Minneapolis. Likewise, I’d expect them to inquire about restricted free agents Greg Monroe with Detroit and Gordon Hayward with Utah via sign-and-trades. Charlotte Observer - See more at: http://hoopshype.com/rumors/tag/charlotte_hornets#sthash.tghVRYZE.dpuf

It's gonna be a fun offseason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What would a max deal be for Hayward per year? I'm not sold on the fact that he's worth a max deal, but I would totally want to bring him in.

I think it's a 5yr/80mil contract.

Gordon was seeking a 4yr/50mil which the JAZZ declined.

I think that Gordon is worth a max contract, but he would be getting paid much higher than Big Al.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's a 5yr/80mil contract.

Gordon was seeking a 4yr/50mil which the JAZZ declined.

I think that Gordon is worth a max contract, but he would be getting paid much higher than Big Al.

 

I think it would take a 4-55/60 m deal to get him out of Utah without a sign and trade...I don't think Utah would match that type of offer for him....

 

For what it's worth, Utah fans think of him as an average player worth no more then 9-10 million a season max.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it would take a 4-55/60 m deal to get him out of Utah without a sign and trade...I don't think Utah would match that type of offer for him....

Agree.

Jazz do have two 1st rounders so they won't feel like they have to keep Gordon.

However, the Kings have already put the no8 pick on the block. They may try to send that pick for a guy like Hayward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hayward no. Can't create his own shot

Hayward is above average with the ball in his hands & has shown the ability to get shots off with guys on him

His shooting percentage is what concerns me more than anything

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No review on the hit of Chatfield. 
    • How would he get ahead of Aaron Rodgers? Rodgers is at a nearly 69% completion rate w/ 17 TDs to 5 INTs.   Comfortably ahead of Bryce in every statistical aspect of he position.  I get Rodgers is old as dirt but.....the production is pretty significantly better. 
    • I hear you, the sense of anger and resentment on the Huddle is bad even by Huddle Standards... I've tried to be pretty measured on Bryce lately.  I want him to succeed.  And I do think he does some things well, and makes plays.  When he throws with anticipation, things look good.   The problem is we're not seeing Bama Bryce anymore.  We drafted Bama Bryce.  We get 5.0 YPA Bryce.  It's not exciting football.  I love the wins, so I don't care that much about how pretty things are.  The reality is fantasy football and sports gambling have overrun many people's perspectives on football and sports at large.  Most fans want to see the big plays down the field for their own excitement.  Most knowledgeable fans want to see it as a way to keep a D honest, close the door on an opponent, and just better execute good football. Remember the old Bill Belichick expression: "Stats are for losers."  I'd much rather have ugly wins than pretty losses.  But I can still enjoy a pretty loss on the HOPE that next time we'll get that bounce of luck our way.   Wins and losses are often stated as a QB stat when football is a team game.  We saw how Flacco has a career day but the Cincy D let him down.  Does that loss count against Flacco?  It shouldn't because W/L should be a Head Coach stat. As far as game winning drives as a stat, it's not overly important.  It's cool, certainly so.  It's also a team stat.  If WRs don't catch the ball, if OL don't block, etc it's a moot point anyway.  Like we had in Philly last year.  Ideally, you shouldn't be in that position at the end of the game. Now as far as Bryce himself, I want him to do well.  I want him to take the position of franchise QB instead of have it placed gently upon his head.  I just don't think he's that guy.  We'll finish this season with Bryce, and if he proves he's the guy and puts us in a winning position, great.  If not, then we bring in competition for him.  Or we trade him.
×
×
  • Create New...