Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lance: Market Value vs Your Value


bLACKpANTHER

What would you pay for Lance?  

19 members have voted

  1. 1. What should be the market value of Lance?

    • $6 mil @ year
      0
    • $7 mil @ year
      5
    • $8 mil @ year
      7
    • $9 mil @ year
      4
    • $10 mil @ year +
      3
  2. 2. What would you be willing to pay to make him a Hornet?

    • $6 mil @ year
      3
    • $7 mil @ year
      3
    • $8 mil @ year
      4
    • $9 mil @ year
      5
    • $10 mil @ year +
      4
  3. 3. What do you think Lance will make in FA?

    • $6 mil @ year
      0
    • $7 mil @ year
      2
    • $8 mil @ year
      2
    • $9 mil @ year
      4
    • $10 mil @ year +
      11


Recommended Posts

I said I think his market value should be around $9m. As the Hornets and due to his craziness I would only pay $7m. I do think someone in the league will overpay 10m+. 

 

This all being said. I do not want him on our team. If it happens I will support it but he is definitely on my do not want list. I do not want his crazy antics on my team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's going to get more than 9 mil you guys are in over your head if you think a guy with his production isn't going to get 8 figures

Sent from my SGH-M919 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Agree.

He's more in the range of 9mil per season, but he'll probably get $11-12. I don't think he'll get more than 12.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just some snippets from Zach Lowe's Grantland article on the subject, including thoughts about Charlotte being one of the 3 contenders for his services...As he finishes the article, he states (as below) that some teams think/hope he cost himself money and that the market starts in the 6-8 range. But, he also says a team (he mentions the Lakers) could get ballsy and throw out a 1 year, 15 million type deal or one that is incentive laden. 

 

"Stephenson should fit any long-term picture the Pacers have of themselves; they know him best and he’s comfortable there. But price could be an issue. Indiana is hoping Stephenson has cost himself some money, and there are lots of teams waiting around to see if the market starts in the $6 million–$8 million range — a spot at which they might dive in. The Pacers would outbid that, but it takes only one daring team to take a leap and smash that market apart."

 

Charlotte Hornets: Michael Jordan is talking big, and the Bobcats have money to spend. Gerald Henderson and Michael Kidd-Gilchrist are nice players, but MKG is in the midst of a full-blown shot reconstruction, and Henderson can’t reliably shoot from deep or create off the bounce.

Stephenson would provide some juice for an offense that needs it, as well as ensure that Kemba Walker isn’t overburdened. He just spent four years learning a defensive system that isn’t much different from what Steve Clifford runs. Charlotte got a taste of winning, and they’re hungry for more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You're assuming just as well.   Morgan and Canales were hired 3 days apart.  I believe it was partially due to their connections in Seattle.  i believe Tepper wanted some familiarity with his GM and HC.  It is so easy to sit back and arm-chair QB over draft picks.  You don't know what the philosophy was going into the 2024 draft.  I believe Canales and Morgan were drafting for the future.  XL and Brooks point to that philosophy. Name me one GM that is 100% on draft picks.  Just one.  You're not going to find one.    I think year one picks weren't for what can you do for me now but Potential.   XL hasn't lived up to the hype of a 1st rounder.  I think we all can agree on that. However, there still is hope he comes around.  What I believe they saw in him was his speed after the catch.  He needs to get more consistent but when he gets the ball you kind of hold your breath just a second because if he gets free, he's gone.  The Brooks pick was a signing for the future, and no one could have guessed he would re-injure the same ACL.  This makes the pick look bad but Dallas was ready to draft him later that same round.  IMO we'll have to see what happens next season before we can call this a bust. Wallace has improved each season and for a third rounder has done well.  Sanders has shown flashes and considering the pick in the 4th round it wasn't a bad pick.  His sophomore season IMO was a little bit more productive.  Smith-Wade has been a good addition and has played well.  For a 5th round pick to get as much playing time as he has.  Most picks below round 3 should take a couple of years to get up to speed.  He's been a decent player.  Crumedy, no comment We turned Barrett into Jackson.  This was an amazing move and basically got a starting CB for a 7th round pick.  Pretty shrewd if you ask me. Coker, maybe the best Free Agent signing of the 2024 draft class. So, in short, you can't say that the draft was a bust.  It isn't a home run but all but one are still on the team and outside of Brooks have made contributions to wins.  2025 draft class has been much better with almost every pick making contributions this season.  Now take Fitterer's two years and compare them to Morgan and tell me that they have the same philosophy. 
    • He hasn’t led crap, he’s on loaded teams and a piece of the puzzle. And he’s he has improved drastically but it took the ultimate QB whispers in Shanahan and KOC. You put him on this Panther team and he’s back to normal Darnold 
    • Slavin and Jarvis week to week. Florida cheap shots took out our two best players.  I’d start KK so he can beat the brakes off someone.  
×
×
  • Create New...