Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hornets willing to part with #9 for Afflalo


bLACKpANTHER

Recommended Posts

 

The Chicago Bulls have been linked most prominently to a deal with Orlando involving shooting guard Arron Afflalo, although sources say that’s not likely happening on draft night, but it’s still very much in play. The dark horse to obtain Afflalo still remains the Charlotte Hornets, who have long coveted him and are willing to give up the ninth pick and a roster player to do it.

Read more at http://www.basketballinsiders.com/nba-am-lets-make-a-deal-nba-draft-edition/#uuBCy6JZ3hmQj0I3.99

yes pls.. #9 for Afflalo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

they will ask for a fortune, but when the time comes- i think they will bite for Hendo and #9

 

i dont know if we are offering Hendo though, they had him go to the uniform unveiling and he's a "captain" on the team.

I hope we arent stupid on Hendo's stock/upside

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's Terrible. He's just a tad better than Henderson and we are gonna trade the 9th overall pick to do it? I understand trading the pick if u was trying to get Klay Thompson or somebody that's a star and young.

BUT AFFALO. 30 year old sg who's never broke out and just average his whole career. Who also can opt out next year so he would w a rental. Jesus don't be stupid cho

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too much to give up in a loaded draft for what could be a one year rental on a guy.

 

#9, #24 & Henderson for Afflalo & #12 I would do.

 

Or #9, #45 a future 2nd rounder and an expiring for Afflalo & #12.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too much to give up in a loaded draft for what could be a one year rental on a guy.

#9, #24 & Henderson for Afflalo & #12 I would do.

Or #9, #45 a future 2nd rounder and an expiring for Afflalo & #12.

Yes totally agree. I would do it if their 12 was inlvolved. But straight up 9 for affalo. God no

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too much to give up in a loaded draft for what could be a one year rental on a guy.

 

#9, #24 & Henderson for Afflalo & #12 I would do.

 

Or #9, #45 a future 2nd rounder and an expiring for Afflalo & #12.

 

the problem is, charlotte cant draft worth a poo.  do much better in trades. stick with your strength

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it will be #9 and Neal for Afflalo.  I would want O'Quinn also because he is a good backup c that could push Biz for that spot.  Maybe #9 and Biz.  Just stumbled on to this site a few days ago while on hornetsplanet. Hello everyone 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It is hard to win in the NFL. I’m never going to put an * next to a Dub.
    • We had a very favorable matchup our o-line manhandles theirs. Even Etienne looked like he would have had a great game on his limited rushing opportunities. 
    • I think that's part of the problem, he's spreading the ball around too much, many of them are the first read play calls, and on top of that, a large portion of them are purposefully called screens or other short passes. I just looked, the Cardinals are the only other team in the league right now without at least 3 players with 100+ yards receiving so far this year, with the majority of teams having 4 or more.  And even then, their #2 right now is McBride with over 200 yards. Our 2nd leading receiver this year has 108 yards (albeit with 4 more players with 82 or more). On the surface, that might not be as alarming as you might think, but when you add into it that Bryce is currently 6th in the league in pass attempts, and it's even more alarming that he hasn't gotten a 3rd player to 100 yards so far and his second highest is only 108. XL has 39 yards on 18 targets.  Renfrow has 82 yards on 24 targets.  Tremble has 87 on 16 targets.  Sanders has 92 on 14 targets. None of those are good enough, so why aren't we calling more plays with T-Mac as the first read and forcing the ball to him (and again, that's not me wanting my guy to get more targets, that's me wanting more targets for the only productive pass catcher so far this year, I'd feel the same no matter what that player's name was). All of this is why I have issues with Canales' play calling.  How do you have a player who had 73 yards in the first half and then you only give him 1 target in the 2nd half despite playing from behind the majority of that time? You can be happy about the win, happy about Dowdle getting 200 yards, but in a game where your QB threw it 30 times, I can't accept the above sentence in the same breath, that's just terrible play calling, which is on top of the already predictable play calling in general, which is also on top of boring play designs as well. Add it all up, and THAT is why I'm unhappy even after a win, not because "my guy" didn't have a bigger game.
×
×
  • Create New...