Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If You Are Cho: Does Hendo Stay?


TylerDurden

Recommended Posts

Not if YOU were the GM, but if you were Cho... Although, how many of us could actually claim to know thd mind of the mad genius that is Rich Cho? None. That being said, how does Hendo fit here now? As others have said, he does indeed have value coming off the bench, but would he be willing to accept that role? I don't think he would... And it's pretty much that scenario is a guarantee because money dictates everything else in the NBA and Lance is the highest paid guard on the roster now. So what happens from here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know everyone wants to ditch him but I like the idea of having him come off the bench.  Depth is never a bad thing and he's still a decent player.   But yeah you're right, I don't know if he'll accept it, but he may have no choice.  He seems like a good guy so maybe he'll just take it with stride and just play hard to find a new home.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know everyone wants to ditch him but I like the idea of having him come off the bench.  Depth is never a bad thing and he's still a decent player.   But yeah you're right, I don't know if he'll accept it, but he may have no choice.  He seems like a good guy so maybe he'll just take it with stride and just play hard to find a new home.

 

I think you keep him.

 

PJ is a complete unknown right now as a backup

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boozer > Henderson

You are the weakest link, goodbye.

We don't have boozer yet. If we do get boozer I assume we can still keep Hendo. Everyone thinks PJ can replace Hendo already but we don't even know what to expect from him in the NBA yet. We do have Neal as well. I know Hendo could play the SF spot, I don't know if Lance can play SF but I assume he can. I say keep Hendo at least until midseason to see how our team works out and you never know when injuries or a suspension could happen.

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know everyone wants to ditch him but I like the idea of having him come off the bench.  Depth is never a bad thing and he's still a decent player.   But yeah you're right, I don't know if he'll accept it, but he may have no choice.  He seems like a good guy so maybe he'll just take it with stride and just play hard to find a new home.

 

Hendo is worthless off the bench. 

 

Bench players need to be able to come in a put up points fast. 

 

That is not Hendo's game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don't have boozer yet. If we do get boozer I assume we can still keep Hendo. Everyone thinks PJ can replace Hendo already but we don't even know what to expect from him in the NBA yet. We do have Neal as well. I know Hendo could play the SF spot, I don't know if Lance can play SF but I assume he can. I say keep Hendo at least until midseason to see how our team works out and you never know when injuries or a suspension could happen.

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

I could replace Henderson offensively. 90% of his offense is bricking fade away jump shots or stuffing himself at the rim. I can do that. His defense isn't needed with Stephenson & MKG.

Trade him & you can make a bid for Boozer that nobody else will match. He'd flourish here as the 3/4 option behind Jefferson, Stephenson, & Kemba.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hendo is worthless off the bench. 

 

Bench players need to be able to come in a put up points fast. 

 

That is not Hendo's game. 

 

Don't underestimate the ability to prevent the other team's bench from scoring as well.  Henderson may be better when he has less pressure on his back and can come in and contribute.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could replace Henderson offensively. 90% of his offense is bricking fade away jump shots or stuffing himself at the rim. I can do that. His defense isn't needed with Stephenson & MKG.

Trade him & you can make a bid for Boozer that nobody else will match. He'd flourish here as the 3/4 option behind Jefferson, Stephenson, & Kemba.

We will need defense on the bench as well. If we need offense then we can put Neal out. Hendo will be going up against other teams back ups which means less pressure on him.

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can't help but think that you are equating physical attributes alone with wins. I don't subscribe to that thought. No one will argue that Young has a strong arm, but he makes up for it in other ways. The real limitation for him is he needs good route runners with great hands. That's why Young was so good at the end of the 24 season. Thielen and Coker were perfect receivers for him and he had his best games with them. Not having them to start the 25 season hurt. Look at the first 10 games in 25 with a rookie receiver and no Coker and then look at the final 7 games with a more experienced rookie and Coker back and there is a telling difference in Young's performance. Prior to week 10, Young had 1 game with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and 6 games with a rating below 90. In the last 7 games with Coker back, Young had 3 games with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and only 2 games with a rating below 90. The tools a QB has to work with matter more than their arm strength.  To go back to Darnold and Stafford, yes they both have great arm strength but neither had much success with that alone. As I already pointed out, Stafford, even with a canon for an arm, only had 4 winning seasons in his first 12 years. It was only when he went to the right environment that he had true success.
    • I don't love this role for him if I'm being totally honest The pregame show is much more flash than substance and doesn't seem like the right fit for what Luke would bring to the table, and that's his vision of the game. I'd like to see him do something where it more involves him breaking down film and explaining what he's seeing out there, as he sees the game in a way very few ever have.
×
×
  • Create New...