Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

It won't happen, but Panthers should pick up Vick

Rod Butsecks

By Rod Butsecks,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

pharmDmba Newbie

pharmDmba

Posted
Posted

I have tried and tried to come to a reasonable reason why he should or should not be here. I do believe in second chances but I feel he has had his over and over. It's not like this was a one time incident. He did the horrible deeds to some many dogs for so long. He never said he was remorseful only that "it was the culture I was raised in". Anyone from anywhere knows that electrocution, choking, breaking backs, and drowning should trigger a response no matter what culture you are from. I want to slap people who say it was just dogs. They have the intelligence of 2 year olds. Would it be okay if he slammed a toddler to the ground because the kid wasn't up to his expectations? Would we give him a "second chance" With that said, he never served time for dog torture. He only faced justice for bankrolling the operation. Bottom line is, I love this team and always will. I just would have a real problem watching him each week and not thinking about the atrocities he committed again and again. It actually makes me sick to my stomach to even think about him. Still a great athlete, more than likely. A miserable excuse for a human being, without question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MadHatter Rookie

MadHatter

Posted
Posted

Interesting way of looking at it there. Has anyone weighed Vick's bankrolling pit bulls battling other dogs vs. Thomas Davis' pit bulls attacking a woman? Just wondering.....

That has to be one of the dumbest things I have ever heard.

Let us compare the two:

First, a pet who (for reasons we don't know), turned on someone.

Second, a grown man bankrolling a gambling venture that bets on which dog will kill the other one first. A man who tortured and trained dogs to fight to the death for people's enjoyment. A man who would steal household pets and use them as training dummies. A man who killed and buried dogs that did not perform well enough in the ring. A man who still blames others for this situation.

Yea, they are similar.

Please stick to playing with your Tonka Trucks and leave the computer to the adults.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Phil Dees Newbie

Phil Dees

Posted
Posted

Reasons we don't know? The 1st time he was cited I'd call irresponsible. The 2nd time was ignoring liability. That why he was cited.

And "turned on someone" is one thing, allowing them to run loose in my neighborhood (yes MY neighborhood) is another.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SMACKDAB Newbie

SMACKDAB

Posted
Posted

Reasons we don't know? The 1st time he was cited I'd call irresponsible. The 2nd time was ignoring liability. That why he was cited.

And "turned on someone" is one thing, allowing them to run loose in my neighborhood (yes MY neighborhood) is another.

Move then. Simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SMACKDAB Newbie

SMACKDAB

Posted
Posted

In other words you don't agree with the law that dogs should not be allowed to run free? Especially pit bulls? Real bright there. Glad you don't make the laws.

No, didn't say that. HOWEVER, I do agree that some people shouldn't have any access to a computer at all. We all make the laws silly. What do you think, one person sits up there and puts them into action? ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • toldozer
      Canales is holding us back

      By toldozer · Posted

      I don't think Dave touches the defense. That might be a mark against him but definitely a huge red flag for evero. He refuses to run anything other than soft zone and when you don't get pressure that's an awful scheme
    • frankw
      This Bryce Guy (General BY Discussion)

      By frankw · Posted

      You don't have to convince me. I think not picking up the option should absolutely be firmly on the table but I just do not see Tepper and Morgan doing that for previously stated reasons. Therefore I'm not going to bother entertaining the notion. Just hoping we actually get real viable competition. If that doesn't happen at the minimum then my perception of that is complete and utter professional malpractice.
    • Bama Panther
      NFL admits the TMac catch should not have been overturned

      By Bama Panther · Posted

      It was absolutely a catch, and I can’t believe how many folks were stating, before the NFL’s apology, that the overturn was the right call.  The ultimate question in this case is this: can a player complete a catch with only one hand? Of course, we all know the answer to that question, and it is an emphatic “Yes.” T-Mac maintained complete control with one hand (believe it was the right) while the other came off when the ball hit the ground. The ball was in the same position in the one hand (watch T-Mac’s fingers in relation to the NFL shield on the ball) after touching the ground as it was when it first went to the ground. Going back to the question above, if one hand can establish control, then there was no need for the other to stay on the ball, so long as the ball doesn’t move in that one hand that stays on it   It blew my mind that they overturned this in the first place. This should not be a “We got it wrong on the replay because there wasn’t clear and convincing evidence.” This should have been, “That was absolutely a catch.”
×
×
  • Create New...