Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Apparently ESPN's Outside the Lines did a hit piece on Greg Hardy this morning


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

I just posted this in another thread: I hate Greg Hardy. Most selfish, consuming, self-absorbed Panther I can think of. I have trolled him on social media before. But I'm defending him all the way on this one. Beyond even letting the legal system do its thing, I don't think Greg Hardy did it. I think Nicole made the majority of it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think it matters whether he did it or not, or the lady was coked up (or both of them) or not

 

Right or wrong he was found guilty. That is all that people are concerned about. It isn't speculation or rumor...its a situation where the law has already spoken.

 

I dont want to lose Hardy! I want him to play the season...etc etc, but yeah I can understand why the media is honing in on him...and if he played for any other team (particularly the Saints or Falcons, few here would have a problem with the national media focus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think it matters whether he did it or not, or the lady was coked up (or both of them) or not

 

Right or wrong he was found guilty. That is all that people are concerned about. It isn't speculation or rumor...its a situation where the law has already spoken.

 

I dont want to lose Hardy! I want him to play the season...etc etc, but yeah I can understand why the media is honing in on him...and if he played for any other team (particularly the Saints or Falcons, few here would have a problem with the national media focus.

 

Guilty by bench trial, aka one person. No one person is impartial - we all have our inherent biases. He has the right to be tried by a jury of his peers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nobody cared about Greg Hardy before, during, or even after Ray Rice knocked his fiancé the F out.

They only started caring after it became cool to bash the NFL not handling the Rice situation right the first time. And the hypocrisy in all of that is they themselves didn't care about the Rice suspension until the video came out; they're accusing the NFL for under reacting when they did the exact same fuging thing.

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think it matters whether he did it or not, or the lady was coked up (or both of them) or not

 

Right or wrong he was found guilty. That is all that people are concerned about. It isn't speculation or rumor...its a situation where the law has already spoken.

 

I dont want to lose Hardy! I want him to play the season...etc etc, but yeah I can understand why the media is honing in on him...and if he played for any other team (particularly the Saints or Falcons, few here would have a problem with the national media focus.

See, the key by law though is he is not guilty, his guilty sentence is "suspended" pending a trial by jury in a superior court.

 

He is not guilty until after a superior court ruling or even a higher court if he loses and they fight it harder, on grounds like jury tampering due to media influence. I think he will win a a jury trial unless they jury is hand picked by the state to specific take him down. Even if he loses I don't see him being cut, or suspended indefinitely. Maybe cut after the season if the trial does take place in november. He will eat his six games and what ever punishment Jerry has in store for him. He's really a mute point come March so...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Surely, since Young is the qb he is, a 3 year NFL starter, a qb with exceptional command of a playoff team, and many of us are just too stupid and blind to recognize, he will have no trouble mopping the floor with anyone from this list of has-beens and never-weres.
    • After two seasons, I definitely have strong opinions of his playcalling and even stronger ones on his game coaching abilities.  Isolating AT as logic for BY success doesn't make any sense. Look at his body of work, his ratings in intermediate and deep, his bad throw percentages or FOR fuging SURE his terrible footwork. As I have continued to stress, he is an arm throwing, scrambling QB with significantly below average arm strength and underwhelming athletic ability for a modern QB. The "clutch" stuff is a lot of wishful thinking for a guy with a very low career winning percentage. I have never heard clutch attached to a QB that has the kind of winning percentage that he does. It doesn't logically make sense. I understand you are keeping your hope alive but most of us can see what I think you will eventually come to realize, he just isn't an NFL caliber QB.  Sunk cost fallacy is holding onto assets in the hope of recovering a return, rather than taking your losses and reinvesting them into something that may pay off. This is the exact opposite of sunk cost fallacy by keeping a failed asset. He has to be one of the football dumbest players we have ever had in the history of this franchise. Easily the most football dumb 1st round draft pick. Yeah well he seems to fug that up pretty often too. Further back into the stands, I would say.
×
×
  • Create New...