Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A big play offense (minus the big plays)


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Heard Troy Aikman while he was calling another game last week refer to that team's offense as "a big play offense with no big plays". 

 

Couldn't help but think "Man, that's pretty much us too" :(

 

The Panthers do indeed run a 'big play' offense; specifically, a Coryell offense.  For those who have heard that term thrown around here but aren't sure what it means, here's a basic primer:

 

The Coryell Offense (sometimes called Air Coryell) is based on vertical, downfield passing supplemented by a strong running game. The idea is to have a multidimensional attack so that the opposing defense can't concentrate on simply stopping one thing or covering one area of the field.  It's considered a 'big play' offense, meaning that you might see three or four modest plays suddenly followed by a huge chuck down the field for a bunch of yards and maybe a score.

 

So what sorts of things do you need to make that kind of attack work?

 

- Deep threat receivers with great hands (helps a lot of they can block too)

- Solid pass catching tight ends and slot receivers to attack the middle

- A combination of power runningbacks and speed/pass catching backs

- An offensive line that's strong in both run and pass blocking

- A quarterback that can air it out and makes good decisions

 

So looking at that little grocery list, tell me what we have and what we lack.

 

Which of these aspects are we most set at, and which just aren't there at all?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heard Troy Aikman while he was calling another game last week refer to that team's offense as "a big play offense with no big plays". 

 

Couldn't help but think "Man, that's pretty much us too" :(

 

The Panthers do indeed run a 'big play' offense; specifically, a Coryell offense.  For those who have heard that term thrown around here but aren't sure what it means, here's a basic primer:

 

The Coryell Offense (sometimes called Air Coryell) is based on vertical, downfield passing supplemented by a strong running game. The idea is to have a multidimensional attack so that the opposing defense can't concentrate on simply stopping one thing or covering one area of the field.  It's considered a 'big play' offense, meaning that you might see three or four modest plays suddenly followed by a huge chuck down the field for a bunch of yards and maybe a score.

 

So what sorts of things do you need to make that kind of attack work?

 

- Deep threat receivers with great hands (helps a lot of they can block too)

- Solid pass catching tight ends and slot receivers to attack the middle

- A combination of power runningbacks and speed/pass catching backs

- An offensive line that's strong in both run and pass blocking

- A quarterback that can air it out and makes good decisions

 

So looking at that little grocery list, tell me what we have and what we lack.

 

Which of these aspects are we most set at, and which just aren't there at all?

 

 

We have: TEs,  1 Deep treat, RB combo,semi- OL, and a GOAT QB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't read, couldn't respond to your full post. But I do believe that the Panthers are on pace to have much more 15-20+ yd plays this year than they had last year!

 

So they are returning to a big play offense again. The Panthers just need to know how to mix up the short stuff. And Shula needs to show better play calling in/near the redzone.

 

Panthers kicked too many FG's this year that should have been TD's, or shots at the enzone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heard Troy Aikman while he was calling another game last week refer to that team's offense as "a big play offense with no big plays". 

 

Couldn't help but think "Man, that's pretty much us too" :(

 

The Panthers do indeed run a 'big play' offense; specifically, a Coryell offense.  For those who have heard that term thrown around here but aren't sure what it means, here's a basic primer:

 

The Coryell Offense (sometimes called Air Coryell) is based on vertical, downfield passing supplemented by a strong running game. The idea is to have a multidimensional attack so that the opposing defense can't concentrate on simply stopping one thing or covering one area of the field.  It's considered a 'big play' offense, meaning that you might see three or four modest plays suddenly followed by a huge chuck down the field for a bunch of yards and maybe a score.

 

So what sorts of things do you need to make that kind of attack work?

 

- Deep threat receivers with great hands (helps a lot of they can block too)

- Solid pass catching tight ends and slot receivers to attack the middle

- A combination of power runningbacks and speed/pass catching backs

- An offensive line that's strong in both run and pass blocking

- A quarterback that can air it out and makes good decisions

 

So looking at that little grocery list, tell me what we have and what we lack.

 

Which of these aspects are we most set at, and which just aren't there at all?

Offensive line is biggest hindrance.  Our RBs could be fine rushing the ball with some blocking.  Hard to tell if we have a good scat back because we don't throw often to backs.  (We should though).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

- A combination of power runningbacks and speed/pass catching backs

- An offensive line that's strong in both run and pass blocking

 

Clearly we have neither of these two ingredients.

 

I could argue that we do actually have the first of those two.  It's just hurt right now.

 

Point number two?  Not much I can say there :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't read, couldn't respond to your full post. But I do believe that the Panthers are on pace to have much more 15-20+ yd plays this year than they had last year!

 

So they are returning to a big play offense again. The Panthers just need to know how to mix up the short stuff. And Shula needs to show better play calling in/near the redzone.

 

Panthers kicked too many FG's this year that should have been TD's, or shots at the enzone.

 

Yes, I think the Panthers are way ahead of last years big play count thanks to Cam & Benji. And if Cam continues to drop those sweet passes to Cotchery....mmmmmm.

 

This offense can't sustain drives like last year.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember, Panthers were amongst the leaders in explosive plays Newton's first two years. And if you ask me, the offensive group the Panthers have this year, is as good or better than the one they had in 2011, 2012 (even before the RB's got hurt).

 

Of course now, the RB's are worse than every before due to injuries, making the team not nearly as flexible. But the receivers are much better than in 2011. The TE's were better in 2011, but the better WR's are better now so that offsets it.

 

If the RB's were healthy, and the OC could be reliable, then I would definitely expect this years Panther team to be much more explosive than even the 2011 one. However, with the current RB injuries, unless there's a change in offensive direction to compensate for the injured RB's (sweeps, bootlegs, screens, reverses, etc., follow by intermediate and down field throws),

 

I'll keep my hopes up. But they are ahead in explosive plays--at this point--compared to last years team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

This offense can't sustain drives like last year.

 

 

I think they have a much better potential too IF our run game can get back to average.

 

We've had good 3rd down success at 3rd and medium/short with the passing game.  If we can average 3-4 yards a carry rushing, it should help us a lot on 3rd down.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they have a much better potential too IF our run game can get back to average.

 

We've had good 3rd down success at 3rd and medium/short with the passing game.  If we can average 3-4 yards a carry rushing, it should help us a lot on 3rd down.  

 

I'd love to believe getting our backfield healthy again helps us reach that goal.

 

But then I look at the run blocking... :unsure:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I’m keeping an eye on what the Hawks do with Boye Mafe. There’s a few young talented players that needs to be retained and one of their defensive starters might not fit within the budget. My guess is probably Riq Woolen is voted off the island but Mafe could be potentially too. His stats aren’t eye popping, but in McDonald’s defense, his role is to leverage for the DL to clean up. Mafe’s QB pressure rate is top notch and in a different scheme, he could clean up.    Just something to watch this weekend when SEA is in town.
    • Ok fair to judge only his starts.  But you do acknowledge that going from "he's waaaay above league average in a number of categories" to "here's a single stat where he's above league average (not "waaaay") and another where he is exactly at the league average" is a pretty significant backpedal, no?  I'm guessing he's probably in the ~10th range for completion percentage too if we're only looking at starts (I'm too lazy to isolate his starts and do the calculations), so I'll grant you that one too.  But I don't think completion percentage is all that meaningful as a standalone stat if it isn't bolstered by good TD%, Y/A, etc. On that note, for how much people like posting Passing Charts in here (*cough* CRA) - if you peep Shough's passing charts, he hasn't completed a single 20+ yard pass in the past 3 games combined.  His last one was in Week 13 against the Dolphins, which was a single pass of 24 yards.  I just want to be consistent in how we apply our standards - I think it's always been warranted to criticize Bryce for it (even dating back to his rookie season), but do we suddenly not care about that with Shough? And yeah I did acknowledge that Saints' fans have reason to be excited about him and complimented his poise, which is giving my props.  Still not sure I agree that he looks better than a "ton" of QBs nor do I think you or anyone have really demonstrated that.  I think you are generally one of the more reasonable level-headed posters which is why I'm confused at what I consider to be rather hyperbolic language about Shough.
    • I don't disagree with you, but want to point out that Tremble's strong suit has always been blocking. Case and point: on Horn's 25 yard run, he lays down not 1 but 2 nice blocks...and is looking for #3! https://www.panthers.com/video/jimmy-horn-jr-s-25-yard-run-gives-panthers-red-zone-access-on-first-drive
×
×
  • Create New...