Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A big play offense (minus the big plays)


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Heard Troy Aikman while he was calling another game last week refer to that team's offense as "a big play offense with no big plays". 

 

Couldn't help but think "Man, that's pretty much us too" :(

 

The Panthers do indeed run a 'big play' offense; specifically, a Coryell offense.  For those who have heard that term thrown around here but aren't sure what it means, here's a basic primer:

 

The Coryell Offense (sometimes called Air Coryell) is based on vertical, downfield passing supplemented by a strong running game. The idea is to have a multidimensional attack so that the opposing defense can't concentrate on simply stopping one thing or covering one area of the field.  It's considered a 'big play' offense, meaning that you might see three or four modest plays suddenly followed by a huge chuck down the field for a bunch of yards and maybe a score.

 

So what sorts of things do you need to make that kind of attack work?

 

- Deep threat receivers with great hands (helps a lot of they can block too)

- Solid pass catching tight ends and slot receivers to attack the middle

- A combination of power runningbacks and speed/pass catching backs

- An offensive line that's strong in both run and pass blocking

- A quarterback that can air it out and makes good decisions

 

So looking at that little grocery list, tell me what we have and what we lack.

 

Which of these aspects are we most set at, and which just aren't there at all?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heard Troy Aikman while he was calling another game last week refer to that team's offense as "a big play offense with no big plays". 

 

Couldn't help but think "Man, that's pretty much us too" :(

 

The Panthers do indeed run a 'big play' offense; specifically, a Coryell offense.  For those who have heard that term thrown around here but aren't sure what it means, here's a basic primer:

 

The Coryell Offense (sometimes called Air Coryell) is based on vertical, downfield passing supplemented by a strong running game. The idea is to have a multidimensional attack so that the opposing defense can't concentrate on simply stopping one thing or covering one area of the field.  It's considered a 'big play' offense, meaning that you might see three or four modest plays suddenly followed by a huge chuck down the field for a bunch of yards and maybe a score.

 

So what sorts of things do you need to make that kind of attack work?

 

- Deep threat receivers with great hands (helps a lot of they can block too)

- Solid pass catching tight ends and slot receivers to attack the middle

- A combination of power runningbacks and speed/pass catching backs

- An offensive line that's strong in both run and pass blocking

- A quarterback that can air it out and makes good decisions

 

So looking at that little grocery list, tell me what we have and what we lack.

 

Which of these aspects are we most set at, and which just aren't there at all?

 

 

We have: TEs,  1 Deep treat, RB combo,semi- OL, and a GOAT QB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't read, couldn't respond to your full post. But I do believe that the Panthers are on pace to have much more 15-20+ yd plays this year than they had last year!

 

So they are returning to a big play offense again. The Panthers just need to know how to mix up the short stuff. And Shula needs to show better play calling in/near the redzone.

 

Panthers kicked too many FG's this year that should have been TD's, or shots at the enzone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heard Troy Aikman while he was calling another game last week refer to that team's offense as "a big play offense with no big plays". 

 

Couldn't help but think "Man, that's pretty much us too" :(

 

The Panthers do indeed run a 'big play' offense; specifically, a Coryell offense.  For those who have heard that term thrown around here but aren't sure what it means, here's a basic primer:

 

The Coryell Offense (sometimes called Air Coryell) is based on vertical, downfield passing supplemented by a strong running game. The idea is to have a multidimensional attack so that the opposing defense can't concentrate on simply stopping one thing or covering one area of the field.  It's considered a 'big play' offense, meaning that you might see three or four modest plays suddenly followed by a huge chuck down the field for a bunch of yards and maybe a score.

 

So what sorts of things do you need to make that kind of attack work?

 

- Deep threat receivers with great hands (helps a lot of they can block too)

- Solid pass catching tight ends and slot receivers to attack the middle

- A combination of power runningbacks and speed/pass catching backs

- An offensive line that's strong in both run and pass blocking

- A quarterback that can air it out and makes good decisions

 

So looking at that little grocery list, tell me what we have and what we lack.

 

Which of these aspects are we most set at, and which just aren't there at all?

Offensive line is biggest hindrance.  Our RBs could be fine rushing the ball with some blocking.  Hard to tell if we have a good scat back because we don't throw often to backs.  (We should though).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

- A combination of power runningbacks and speed/pass catching backs

- An offensive line that's strong in both run and pass blocking

 

Clearly we have neither of these two ingredients.

 

I could argue that we do actually have the first of those two.  It's just hurt right now.

 

Point number two?  Not much I can say there :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't read, couldn't respond to your full post. But I do believe that the Panthers are on pace to have much more 15-20+ yd plays this year than they had last year!

 

So they are returning to a big play offense again. The Panthers just need to know how to mix up the short stuff. And Shula needs to show better play calling in/near the redzone.

 

Panthers kicked too many FG's this year that should have been TD's, or shots at the enzone.

 

Yes, I think the Panthers are way ahead of last years big play count thanks to Cam & Benji. And if Cam continues to drop those sweet passes to Cotchery....mmmmmm.

 

This offense can't sustain drives like last year.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember, Panthers were amongst the leaders in explosive plays Newton's first two years. And if you ask me, the offensive group the Panthers have this year, is as good or better than the one they had in 2011, 2012 (even before the RB's got hurt).

 

Of course now, the RB's are worse than every before due to injuries, making the team not nearly as flexible. But the receivers are much better than in 2011. The TE's were better in 2011, but the better WR's are better now so that offsets it.

 

If the RB's were healthy, and the OC could be reliable, then I would definitely expect this years Panther team to be much more explosive than even the 2011 one. However, with the current RB injuries, unless there's a change in offensive direction to compensate for the injured RB's (sweeps, bootlegs, screens, reverses, etc., follow by intermediate and down field throws),

 

I'll keep my hopes up. But they are ahead in explosive plays--at this point--compared to last years team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

This offense can't sustain drives like last year.

 

 

I think they have a much better potential too IF our run game can get back to average.

 

We've had good 3rd down success at 3rd and medium/short with the passing game.  If we can average 3-4 yards a carry rushing, it should help us a lot on 3rd down.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they have a much better potential too IF our run game can get back to average.

 

We've had good 3rd down success at 3rd and medium/short with the passing game.  If we can average 3-4 yards a carry rushing, it should help us a lot on 3rd down.  

 

I'd love to believe getting our backfield healthy again helps us reach that goal.

 

But then I look at the run blocking... :unsure:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah but at least that QB would be not short.  I keep going back to the fact other than Wilson no other short QB has ever won a Super Bowl. The success rate of short QBs is very, very low. Like count on one hand low.  Yeah some people would include Brees too but I don’t consider a 6 foot tall QB short, imo. 
    • I just rewatched all the highlights from after Bryce being benched. The Bryce hate needs to calm down a little bit. He showed a ton of potential the back half of the year. Same with Legette. They both made great plays when it mattered and a few mistakes when it counted. If we didn’t have a historically awful defense last year we could have ended even a bit better. Going into a brand new season we should be optimistic at least before game one. 2015 no one expected to go anywhere and the team steam rolled the league. I’m not saying that will happen, but hopefully we made strides to improve on the end of last year. Bryce put both Super Bowl teams in a battle last year and if we had a better D we could have taken them both. So at least look forward to the season and not past the season until it at least begins. 
    • I’m not mad at Moehrig.  He’s great at what he does.  And to be honest, a lot of my favorite safeties in our history were box-first type guys - Maxie, Minter, Mike Mitchell, Chris Harris…  they’re first and foremost objective was to put people on their backs and coverage was secondary.  There is a place for that.  There is a definite need for that.  Physical guys that set the tone.  So cool, we have that in Moerhig. But what we have lacked for the vast majority of our existence is a true free safety that cleans everything up on the back end.  Sometimes they come in the form of a JOAT, like Peppers.  I think he would be a fantastic compliment to Moehrig’s strengths and weaknesses.  If we don’t go after him, I certainly hope Ransom is given the chance to grow and develop in real-time with real game reps, because what he did in preseason was very encouraging to see.  I hope he can grow into that roaming center fielder with a little bit of an edge to him as an enforcer as well.  He has the tools.  In the meantime, adding Peppers would only help.
×
×
  • Create New...