Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Panthers D has given up 136 points over their past 4 games, most in franchise history


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

What do you make of that stat? The defense was never that bad in early 1995 or 2001 or 2010, but yet we've managed to go 1-2-1 over those 4 games due to Cam. We had arguably our best defense in team history last year, but now we're a Luke Kuechly injury away from having arguably our worst ever. Is the talent drop-off between Hardy and Addison and Mike Mitchell and DeCoud really THAT dramatic? 

 

Yes, Gettleman built this year's defense around a solid pass rush, but did he never once stop to think what would happen if Hardy went down early in the season? Never thought about acquiring someone in the secondary with even MEDIOCRE coverage skills?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My heart will always be defensive, but I have no choice but to root for the offense this year.  The defense not only has none, but should be considered criminally liable for at the very least emotional/psychological anguish, considering that they're failing to execute practically anything well.  Yes, at times, they get stops, but largely for the last four games they're out there to line up against the offense and flail around like cardboard cutouts. 

 

The priority this offseason has to be the offensive line and the secondary.  There can't be any other acceptable course of action.

 

What do you make of that stat? The defense was never that bad in early 1995 or 2001 or 2010, but yet we've managed to go 1-2-1 over those 4 games due to Cam. We had arguably our best defense in team history last year, but now we're a Luke Kuechly injury away from having arguably our worst ever. Is the talent drop-off between Hardy and Addison and Mike Mitchell and DeCoud really THAT dramatic? 

 

Yes, Gettleman built this year's defense around a solid pass rush, but did he never once stop to think what would happen if Hardy went down early in the season? Never thought about acquiring someone in the secondary with even MEDIOCRE coverage skills?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just when I thought we might be able to sign Hardy on the cheap. There's no way that he doesn't know this, and or use it as leverage. All of this is on the premise that he'd be welcomed back of course. If say he's very very essential to having a Top D.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would feel bad about our current situation but you look around the NFL and see teams win one week, blown out the next. The rules in the NFL favor the passing game so much, it's folly to depend on your defense and running game.

 

When you run the ball, almost every possible penalty is on the offense. When you pass, it's the opposite. 

 

And let's be clear about something, we haven't played a bad QB since week 1. Flacco, Roethlisberger, Stafford, Cutler, and Dalton are all good enough to expose a defense. 

 

Flacco threw 5 tds on the Bucs in the first half....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just when I thought we might be able to sign Hardy on the cheap. There's no way that he doesn't know this, and or use it as leverage. All of this is on the premise that he'd be welcomed back of course. If say he's very very essential to having a Top D.

 

How is he going to use his legal troubles as leverage to get more money out of us? We are paying him to work on a rap album as we speak. No way he signs for anything but peanuts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's sad man. A once feared defense just 5 weeks ago is now the softest defense in the NFL. Once I saw our secondary literally running away from contact, I almost shed a tear. Luke, TD, Star, and KK are the only ones worth mentioning, and Star isn't even playing that good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I feel like this trade just lives rent free in people's heads and keeps morphing into different things. First thing is that the rumored trade was for future firsts. They wouldn't have any extra picks in 2023; the firsts would have been for 2024 and 2025. With very few exceptions, NFL GMs don't value picks that far away. You have to have a lot of job security to pull that off. Like Chiefs, Eagles, Rams kinda stability. That's obviously not the case with David Tepper, especially since he'd just fired his head coach. No GM except for like Howie Roseman is going to trade an asset you have now for a future asset you probably get to use.  Second, at the time you'd have to assume these are first rounders late in the first round. Obviously currency is currency and the panthers need young players, but these weren't slam dunk top ten picks. At the end of the day there's one pick that separates a first and second round pick.  Lastly, the only place that ever reported this trade was the Rams. All the reporters just repeated what McVay said and it became gospel. We have no idea how serious the negotiations were, if they ever really happened, if the offer was real, etc. And I personally believe McVay and Sneed are the kind of guys who would make up rumors like that to fug up other teams, mostly because I assume if I've thought of it someone smarter than me has.  I don't know how you'd call it the greatest draft haul of all time. Firsts quickly lose their value the farther out they are and Burns had 16.5 sacks last season. And anyway those picks would probably just been tossed into the burning inferno of the Bryce trade up so it's a moot point anyway. 
×
×
  • Create New...