Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

At the unemployment office


cookinbrak

Recommended Posts

Had to go there today to show them my search records and stuff. Went to the counter, told them I had an appointment, "have a seat, we'll be with you shortly". They had 18 computers set up for people to look for jobs. Looking around the room, I saw people on Facebook, Yahoo, other web sites, I think one guy was setting his fantasy lineup. There were a couple of people actually searching for jobs. I think one guy was printing coupons, kept running to the printer. I was chagrinned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have 3-5 job offers at all times, it's not that hard to find work here, many just don't want to.

I disagree. Some people with more responsibilities need to find the right job with the right benefits. I understand not taking the first offer.

But I just man the fryer at Burger King. I know nothing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree. Some people with more responsibilities need to find the right job with the right benefits. I understand not taking the first offer.

But I just man the fryer at Burger King. I know nothing

 

 

I'm not saying to take the first job offered, nor would I, however, if you aren't looking for a better job at all times, IMO you are doing it wrong.

 

 

I turned one down Tuesday, that was a fantastic job, and I told them that I would reconsider on Jan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have 3-5 job offers at all times, it's not that hard to find work here, many just don't want to.

 

I went to an interview last week, taking care of rental properties. The guy said "Did you see on the news where the guy got shot on 6th St? That's one of ours."

 

Every job out there, there's a guy named Sanchez that will do it cheaper. And employers know it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went to an interview last week, taking care of rental properties. The guy said "Did you see on the news where the guy got shot on 6th St? That's one of ours."

 

Every job out there, there's a guy named Sanchez that will do it cheaper. And employers know it.

 

 

Not sure what you are trying to say here, but there probably aren't 10 people in my city that can navigate my job the way that I can, but none the less.

 

 

I market myself a lot, and get outside of my comfort zone even more.  I just want steady upward mobility, and I can't achieve that by being content.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is that the school system doesn't prepare people for work, it instead prepares them to be democrats.

 

Teaching welding, soldering, automotive, basic computer building, repair, even sowing would be more beneficial to most people than algebra. The marxist idea that eventually every worker will be an artist or a scientist will never be a reality. Someone will need to be the garbage man and nothing in American schools prepares people for that.

 

People with parents who have no intention of sending them to university should receive entirely different schooling and it should put way more emphasis on blue collar work.  They also should teach how to manage a budget and the cons of alimony and child support.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is that the school system doesn't prepare people for work, it instead prepares them to be democrats.

 

Teaching welding, soldering, automotive, basic computer building, repair, even sowing would be more beneficial to most people than algebra. The marxist idea that eventually every worker will be an artist or a scientist will never be a reality. Someone will need to be the garbage man and nothing in American schools prepares people for that.

 

People with parents who have no intention of sending them to university should receive entirely different schooling and it should put way more emphasis on blue collar work.  They also should teach how to manage a budget and the cons of alimony and child support.

 

 

Don't agree with everything you wrote, just wanted to add this.

 

 

 

Right now, plumbers, electricians, framers, welders, divers, etc....are making serious coin, but you have to work, and the work is dangerous sometimes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is that the school system doesn't prepare people for work, it instead prepares them to be democrats.

 

Teaching welding, soldering, automotive, basic computer building, repair, even sowing would be more beneficial to most people than algebra. The marxist idea that eventually every worker will be an artist or a scientist will never be a reality. Someone will need to be the garbage man and nothing in American schools prepares people for that.

 

People with parents who have no intention of sending them to university should receive entirely different schooling and it should put way more emphasis on blue collar work.  They also should teach how to manage a budget and the cons of alimony and child support.

 

 

They have things like that in Germany, which is a hell of a lot more to the left, socialist, whatever, than our own Democratic party. Here's your golden opportunity to not be a dumb person. Chances are it's not going to work but hey, I tried.

 

http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-04-29/what-germany-can-teach-the-u-dot-s-dot-about-vocational-education

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Congratulations do they know who the father is?
    • In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
×
×
  • Create New...