Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Toxic differentias

BuffaloBills62

By BuffaloBills62,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

BuffaloBills62 Newbie

BuffaloBills62

Posted
Posted

Saw this on NFL.com and the Bills board I frequent.  Thought you guys might learn a little bit about football from it.  At the least generate some football discussion heading in to the Thursday night game.

 

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000419687/article/toxic-differential-watch-out-for-bills-texans-in-the-second-half

 

 

Panthers

Takeaway  14

Giveaway  10

Difference +4

Explosive Plays 27

Explosive Plays allowed 33

Difference -6

Toxic Difference -2

 

 

It has long been a proven adage that if you have a plus-2 turnover advantage on your opponent, you will win the game 80 percent of the time. If you have a plus-2 explosive-play advantage, it equally leads to winning about 80 percent of the time. If you have both of those, you win close to 95 percent of the time. You'd be hard-pressed to find any controllable statistical combination that has quite the same rate of predictive success.

 

Saints

Takeaway  7

Giveaway  13

Difference -6

Explosive Plays 29

Explosive Plays allowed 31

Difference -2

Toxic Difference -8

 

 

0ap3000000419536.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BuffaloBills62 Newbie

BuffaloBills62

Posted
  • Author
Posted

lol the bills have to make up a stat called "toxic differentias" to be on top of any list that doesn't involve losing games or multiple back to back superbowls

 

Did you even read the article?  Do you even know what the stat is or the history of it in the league?  Do you even realize that you sound like a moron bringing up the Bills in to this discussion?  What do the Bills have to do with this?  Yes, the word Bills is in the title.  Are you that much of a moron that you only saw that and did not bother reading further down?  And, what exactly do the "back to back" Super Bowl losses matter?  Especially, when they were back to back to back to back losses?

 

What you said added nothing to this.  The Bills do have a better record then the Panthers - does that make you sad?  Of course, I had told everyone here that the Bills would finish the season with a better record, but hey, lets not bring that up, mm'k?  Because what matters more is 20 years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LUUUUUKE Rookie

LUUUUUKE

Posted
Posted

So, our toxic difference is better than theirs. Seems like we all should witness a W tomorrow night then.

That will put us at 4-4-1 and in the drivers seat for the Division title. Tomorrow nights game should be a playoff atmosphere almost it would seem

This is a must win for us, and in Prime Time

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BuffaloBills62 Newbie

BuffaloBills62

Posted
  • Author
Posted

The Falcons toxic differential makes this stat null and void.

 

I think if you compare this stat and these numbers to the overall defense you get a better perspective.  Then include the running ability.

 

Atlanta is ranked 31st on D and 26th at rushing.  These numbers combine to show that Atlanta has a lot of problems and is not a good team.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captain Obvious Proficient

Captain Obvious

Posted
Posted

Did you even read the article?  Do you even know what the stat is or the history of it in the league?  Do you even realize that you sound like a moron bringing up the Bills in to this discussion?  What do the Bills have to do with this?  Yes, the word Bills is in the title.  Are you that much of a moron that you only saw that and did not bother reading further down?  And, what exactly do the "back to back" Super Bowl losses matter?  Especially, when they were back to back to back to back losses?

 

What you said added nothing to this.  The Bills do have a better record then the Panthers - does that make you sad?  Of course, I had told everyone here that the Bills would finish the season with a better record, but hey, lets not bring that up, mm'k?  Because what matters more is 20 years ago.

ask any Cowboy, steerler fan. That's exactly what matters. and no I didn't read the article.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PhillyB Grand Master

PhillyB

Posted
Posted

Did you even read the article?  Do you even know what the stat is or the history of it in the league?  Do you even realize that you sound like a moron bringing up the Bills in to this discussion?  What do the Bills have to do with this?  Yes, the word Bills is in the title.  Are you that much of a moron that you only saw that and did not bother reading further down?  And, what exactly do the "back to back" Super Bowl losses matter?  Especially, when they were back to back to back to back losses?

 

What you said added nothing to this.  The Bills do have a better record then the Panthers - does that make you sad?  Of course, I had told everyone here that the Bills would finish the season with a better record, but hey, lets not bring that up, mm'k?  Because what matters more is 20 years ago.

 

the bills are conveniently at the top of this list that you posted with the advice to "learn something about football" which coincides with that buffalo bills username and that buffalo bills avatar. i'm sure it's all just a coincidence though.

 

go back to drinking virgin peach daiquiris  or whatever it is you do until the nursing home rings the 7pm bedtime bell

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BuffaloBills62 Newbie

BuffaloBills62

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Ooooo, that was downright mean, PhillyB.  SMH with a grin.

 

It's not mean, it's moronic.  And all the fanboy fine young males who like to give pie to posts are just as retarded.

 

It's also ironic, because the very thing that many of you complain about - Cowboys and Steelers fans, among others, pointing to their past as relevant.  Captain Obvious points this out and yet, here is the douchebag pointing to 20 years ago.

 

Well, I guess he's afraid to look at right now.  I guess he's afraid to see the Panthers have a losing record and he wants to sulk in the misery that is so popular here.  It drives me nuts to think of how good your football team is, how much talent the roster has to build upon and everyone here just cries about nonsense.  Every team has growing pains.  Shut up and be patient, this team is good.

 

This has nothing to do with the Bills.  Hell, I'd not even have posted it if it came from Bleacher Report or some other make believe site.  But, this is from NFL.com and a reputable stat from a known author.

 

The whole pie thing is just stupid - as dumb as the "like" on failbook.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BuffaloBills62 Newbie

BuffaloBills62

Posted
  • Author
Posted

the bills are conveniently at the top of this list that you posted with the advice to "learn something about football" which coincides with that buffalo bills username and that buffalo bills avatar. i'm sure it's all just a coincidence though.

 

go back to drinking virgin peach daiquiris  or whatever it is you do until the nursing home rings the 7pm bedtime bell

And you've not been around here enough to know that I use that as a schtick?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted

It's not mean, it's moronic.  And all the fanboy fine young males who like to give pie to posts are just as retarded.

 

It's also ironic, because the very thing that many of you complain about - Cowboys and Steelers fans, among others, pointing to their past as relevant.  Captain Obvious points this out and yet, here is the douchebag pointing to 20 years ago.

 

Well, I guess he's afraid to look at right now.  I guess he's afraid to see the Panthers have a losing record and he wants to sulk in the misery that is so popular here.  It drives me nuts to think of how good your football team is, how much talent the roster has to build upon and everyone here just cries about nonsense.  Every team has growing pains.  Shut up and be patient, this team is good.

 

This has nothing to do with the Bills.  Hell, I'd not even have posted it if it came from Bleacher Report or some other make believe site.  But, this is from NFL.com and a reputable stat from a known author.

 

The whole pie thing is just stupid - as dumb as the "like" on failbook.

 

Wow, dude. 

 

Take a chill pill.   This is the Internet.  This is a football message board.   It is  not  that  serious.  No one attacked you personally, OK.  Have some pie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PhillyB Grand Master

PhillyB

Posted
Posted

It's not mean, it's moronic.  And all the fanboy fine young males who like to give pie to posts are just as retarded.

 

The whole pie thing is just stupid - as dumb as the "like" on failbook.

 

put away the bingo chips and go to bed and reminisce about your glory days in world war one

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LUUUUUKE Rookie

LUUUUUKE

Posted
Posted

Anyone who reads any posts on here is attacked personally. It's a personal attack on anyone's intelligence level to read 80% of this garbage, but yet, here we all are refreshing the Huddle and posting anytime there's a free second in our busy lives.

It's much like 2 girls, one cup. You know what's going to happen, yet strangely, you can't look away until it's too late.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MHS831
      Panthers Top 30 Visits and Draft Tracker

      By MHS831 · Posted

      I appreciate the honesty in your posts--I am not sure Canales is rusing(?) because I don't think we are good enough yet to draft players for depth on day 1.  I do think we are in limbo, fwiw.  At 19, I think you are drafting second rounders in the first.
    • strato
      It is time to Consider the Likelihood of WR at #19

      By strato · Posted

      We are in a unique situation here. Just my opinion. Three things: Moton’s playing health has been gradually declining as he is aging, while his contract is a drag on the payroll.  Something will give with him sooner than later but I think 2026 could be it.  So.. need a right tackle by 2027. At the latest.    Icky’s individual situation is unique as well. They would have had an extension done by now if not for the injury. We only have him for this year. With no assurance he will ever be the same player.  It would be reckless just to assume. Now we have Walker for one year. And that is a major relief. Maybe he is the answer, but the team that knows him best let him go and it was cheap for us to sign him. So how much did they value him?    We look to be needing two tackles by 2027.  And have poo for depth this year as well. So anyway we could draft a guy for 2027 RT and groom him this year, and see how Icky does, and act as needed in 2027. Spread out filling the two holes over 2 years.    Then I remember, hey if Bryce doesn’t get a Lot more consistent do they extend him? Hoping not, if he isn’t really good.    So then we are looking at the 2027 draft which people say is gonna be loaded with QBs. If we need a LT and a QB what is the pick gonna get spent on?   Taking into account the recovery success rates cited here on the Icky surgery, you might want to plan for him to not be the same player. rather than assume he will be and get caught with your pants down.  It is a tough situation.    And factor in that it is critically important to protect this QB, always, but especially this year where it is said to be make or break. And how you might feel about that.    All of it points to a real possibility that these things converge in the negative, like Bruce sucks and Icky is not the same. In that case if you want to be assured of getting LT secured, the only place you can do that through the draft could be very well be 2026 1st round.     For me, I would like to err on the side of caution.  Cover for these outcomes. It wouldn’t be fun. Added benefit is if we do have a tackle go down this year we will have a guy there. Because I don’t know what we have now.  
    • flagfootballcoach28
      Mike Kaye: “I would keep a pretty close eye on {KC Concepcion}.”

      By flagfootballcoach28 · Posted

      I agree. In a perfect world I wouldn’t want to draft another WR, but in this draft it’s fine based on the value of who will be there at #19.  All of the top tier guys worth pick #19 at other positions of need will be long gone. Only exception is Dillon Thieneman, but he’s almost a shoe in for the Vikings as the Harrison Smith replacement. Some posters on here want to draft an OT just to check a box without realizing the concerns and risk that comes along with said player. Sounds like XL to me… desperately drafting need… KC is a pretty safe player.  Produced all 3 years in college and last year in the SEC vs a lot of top corners in this years draft. He single handily dropped the South Carolina CB Brandon Cisse’s draft stock with how bad he abused him.   Sometimes it’s best to try and hit a double instead of going for the home run. This draft screams “go for the double”. Esp in the first. 
×
×
  • Create New...