Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

They Gambled. They Lost. It's That Simple.


fieryprophet

Recommended Posts

I will agree with you on the last part.

Hurney and Fox were always considered "a package deal". They should have been let go as a package too.

I normally wouldn't favor parting with both a head coach and a GM in the same season, but in that case it likely would have been best.

Yeah, I always though the Rivera era had an odd start with Hurney still here. Hey Ron welcome aboard, look at all my overpaid boys I love so much!!!! You let me know who you want to draft at QB and lets roll!

Never felt like a new start really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But we can only really judge him on one of those three things. The depth chart has not been an issue because our bad starters have even worse backups. We really do not know how much input he actually has on roster decisions. I really believe that his influence is being overblown. Gettleman strikes me as someone who will listen to everyone's opinion but follows his own instincts in the end. And when it comes to the coaches Rivera definitely is fair game, but considering the love/hate relationship this fanbase has from week to week with everyone its hard to be absolute there either.

 

He started Melvin White over Josh Norman, Silatolu over Norwell and still hasn't made KK Short a full time starter, among other decisions.

 

I think Rivera can definitely be questioned on the depth chart.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He started Melvin White over Josh Norman, Silatolu over Norwell and still hasn't made KK Short a full time starter, among other decisions.

 

I think Rivera can definitely be questioned on the depth chart.

 

 

Wasn't he the one who advocated for Norman to get more playing time? And benched White against the Ravens? And we know Norman's well-documented issues; half the board have hoped Norman would get cut at various times.

 

And I wouldn't be surprised at Silatolu getting the nod over a UDFA rookie who did not perform as well at LG as he did at RG.

 

And our d-line rotation makes the "starter" label meaningless. KK has 20 fewer snaps total than Star.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone wants to find effigies to burn and jobs to be lost and players to be cut and rabble, rabble, rabble.

 

It boils down to one very simple reality: the front office (assign blame between coaches and GM as you wish) lacked the fiscal resources to address all areas of need and decided that the offensive line could hold up if necessary. It was a fatal gamble and they lost. There aren't any real schematic answers that fit with the offensive roster we currently have: we lack the offensive line to establish the running game and play action schemes our core philosophy is built around and other, less line-intensive schemes such as a dink-and-dunk WCO are entirely unsuited to the receiving corps we have.

 

So keep in mind between all of your hell-raising that before amputating every limb off the patient one should wonder if their broken ankle might be the cause that keeps them from walking.

 

In other words, winning wasn't a priority and neither was protecting your QB. You wrote all that just to repeat that same point I've been making since I started posting. Everyone criticizing the FO is doing it because of the reasons you think they shouldn't. Bottom line, you win games at the line of scrimmage. Gettleman with all of his talk of "hog mollies" decided not to make the OL a priority. In business, as in politics, as in life, resources will always be limited, so the only thing that matters is your "priorities." Him not thinking the OL was one means he should be getting blasted. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wasn't he the one who advocated for Norman to get more playing time? And benched White against the Ravens? And we know Norman's well-documented issues; half the board have hoped Norman would get cut at various times.

 

And I wouldn't be surprised at Silatolu getting the nod over a UDFA rookie who did not perform as well at LG as he did at RG.

 

And our d-line rotation makes the "starter" label meaningless. KK has 20 fewer snaps total than Star.

 

Norman was in his doghouse most of last year, and probably would have remained there had White not been abused.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we were a solid winning organization most of us would have no problems with this selection. We would have had a capable starter in place to allow him to be eased into the rotation. If were told prior to the draft that he had been completely cleared health wise, we "probably" wouldn't have a ton of reservations about this selection. If we had picked this young man on Day 3 of the draft most of us would have no problems with this selection because we wouldn't have had to use draft capital to move up and get him. Unfortunately, none of the above were true 1)  We were a terrible team in 2024 and needed an immediate impact player. 2)  He was hurt near the the end of the 2023 season. We traded up to get him even though we knew he wasn't medically cleared to play in 2024. 3) When training camp started we were hearing stories that the knee wasn't ready. That alone should have raised some red flags. I personally would have red-shirted him in 2024 in order to have him ready for 2025. We had Chubba as our lead back and other guys to fill the #2 and #3 spots on the depth chart. There was no need to rush Brooks unto the field in 2024. Here's our draft history in the 2nd round between 2021 and 2024 2021 TMJ 2022 No draft choice. We picked Matt Corall in round 3 (#94) as our only Day 2 pick. 2023 Jonathan Mingo 2024 Jonathon Brooks. We have taken 4 skill players on Day 2 of the draft for the past 4 years who have contributed absolutely nothing to the offensive side of the football. 3 are no longer on the team. Two of them are no longer in the NFL. One  could possibly never start a game due to a knee injury. This type of poor drafting is why this team has been so bad for the entire decade. 
    • Even limited as he was I still don't think they have replaced his production, and not just the sack stats. The games Clowney missed it was very obvious what his value still was. Risky move but whatever. They only had 32 sacks last year and if that drops then it's going to get ugly. I see the improvement in run stopping but not in pass protect in any way.  
    • I have zero issues with this.  
×
×
  • Create New...