Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Should G-man be fired


top dawg

Gettleman gets a pass  

186 members have voted

  1. 1. Should Gettleman be fired?



Recommended Posts

how about the mental gymnastics required to think that steve was worth his 2015 and 2016 cap hits if he would have still been on this team

Isn't he still hitting us for like $5M next year?

 

I'm talking about the thought process that goes onto saying he has been coasting for two years and is washed up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't he still hitting us for like $5M next year?

 

I'm talking about the thought process that goes onto saying he has been coasting for two years and is washed up.

 

We all knew he wasn't washed up. But you can't deny from watching that poo the past two years that he wasn't playing 150% and that he does not have the speed and agility that he used to. Him getting cut fueled him to play as well as he is this year. You think if we kept him and drafted KB still to be the #1 that he'd have these numbers? He'd be hindering KB's development while being merely mediocre. And then we'd have him for 2 more years as well with absurd cap hits for those 2 seasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't he still hitting us for like $5M next year?

 

I'm talking about the thought process that goes onto saying he has been coasting for two years and is washed up.

 

$5 million as opposed to being on the hook for $20 million+ when the non-voidable years kick in is a bargain

 

i don't even bother with the second part.  the only people who know for sure are the coaches and panthers brass and the best anyone on this site other than maybe jeremy can do is pretend they know what they're talking about.

 

i think his release was more than justifiable based on his cap figure alone.  nobody even needs to bother with the "washed up" or "he would've been damaging to the young guys" angles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

$5 million as opposed to being on the hook for $20 million+ when the non-voidable years kick in is a bargain

 

i don't even bother with the second part.  the only people who know for sure are the coaches and panthers brass and the best anyone on this site other than maybe jeremy can do is pretend they know what they're talking about.

 

i think his release was more than justifiable based on his cap figure alone.  nobody even needs to bother with the "washed up" or "he would've been damaging to the young guys" angles.

Would his cap hit really have been $20M? I have no idea.

 

That's fine. We were going to part ways eventually and G-Man made a call. It's debatable whether we could have used Smith this year. I think we could but who knows. Maybe he is to caustic.

 

But we could have been nicer. Dude is the best player we have ever had maybe.

 

But hey it's a business.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we have hurney robbing peter to pay paul via the extension smith signed in 2012 to thank for that.  we would have paid him $14 million between 2014 and 2015 if he would have been on the roster with a minimum of $6 million owed next season even if he retired like he said he would.  if he made it to 2016 he would have been paid a combined $23 million between 2014, 2015, and 2016.  gettleman couldn't have really pulled any accounting tricks to help that either-his contract was already leveraged all to hell and he would have had to take a straight up pay cut to get his cap number down.  the panthers would have almost no leverage in that situation either because if he retired or banged enough pots and pans and got released we'd have to pay him anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He’s kind of overrated to be honest. Never really felt like a true #1 or elevated his play to become a guy the defense really has to worry about. 
    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
×
×
  • Create New...