Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

3rd preseason game ahead...


Zod

Recommended Posts

If you are going to start making predictions based on the preseason, the third game is the cat's meow. Starters will stay in maybe up until halftime, some game planning gets done in the film room.

Good news is Baltimore will have the same mentality on Saturday, and we will get to see what the Panthers can really do against a decent team.

Soo....prediction time.

Do the Panthers come out swinging and look like a post season team, or do they continue on the vanilla road of preseason no mans land?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I will have to go with the latter. The only player that has looked to be in postseason form thus far has been DeAngelo. I expect to see improvement from last game offensively, but not on the defensive side of the ball. But I'd like to see what our Offense does against a good defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My prediction: Nick Hayden helps hold down the line (seriously? about time) and we give up less than 100 yards rushing.

E Brown gets a sack and possibly Peppers too.

Quiet night from our running game probably no rushing TDs.

One of our backup receivers will catch a TD pass.

The starting secondary will blow a coverage and give up a long TD pass.

Score: 17 - 13 Ravens Win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think this next pre-season game will look all that much different than the first two other than the fact that the starters will play more. I do think that the first regular season game will look a lot different, they'll turn it up for that.

My fear is that the injury bug is trying to make up for the lack of them last season...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think our offense gets in gear and goes all tutti-fruity on them. The defense, however, stays in the simple packages and nothing more than fundamentals are stressed. In that, expect better tackling, but little else.

The Ravens offense won't do anything fancy, so neither will we. A vanilla package is all we need to evaluate our folks, and that will probably continue until the Eagles game. Their defense is good enough that we'll want to test some of our real stuff against it though.

Panthers will win this one, just because it's a home game. I'm calling that based on thin air though, I really have nothing more than wishful thinking to justify it.

I'm looking forward to the game tonight, to see how the Ravens look.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone is talking about how the Falcons 1st team has looked strong this preaseason. Please remember they have gone 1-1 against the likes of the Lions and the Rams....combined 3 wins last year.

Fox believes in testing his team in the preseason. We are playing 4 playoff teams in the Giants, Dolphins, Ravens, and Steelers. Playing the likes of these teams identifies areas of weakness so they can be addressed.

Playing the likes of the Lions and Rams do nothing more than pad stats for meaningless games.

Not saying the Falcons are not and will not be a good team this year. However, comparing performances agains the Lions/Rams to the Giants/Dolphins is absurd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone is talking about how the Falcons 1st team has looked strong this preaseason. Please remember they have gone 1-1 against the likes of the Lions and the Rams....combined 3 wins last year.

Fox believes in testing his team in the preseason. We are playing 4 playoff teams in the Giants, Dolphins, Ravens, and Steelers. Playing the likes of these teams identifies areas of weakness so they can be addressed.

Playing the likes of the Lions and Rams do nothing more than pad stats for meaningless games.

Not saying the Falcons are not and will not be a good team this year. However, comparing performances agains the Lions/Rams to the Giants/Dolphins is absurd.

I agree that comparing performances is not the way it should be with the teams the Falcons have played. But our first team guys have looked less than average against the first team guys we have played. Who wins preseason games means nothing really. I more look for how the first team guys played, and if we aren't doing well against playoff caliber teams, that doesn't bode well for our season and the tough schedule we have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I even disagree on the defense. We WILL bring a starting calibre DT into the fold soon. We will also see alot of different things on D during the regular season.

I was talking to Dan Morgan about the defenses performance in the first two games last week. He said to remember this:

1. Our guys are learning a new system

2. We have about 3 vanilla plays that are being run

3. We are using these games to take a long look at alot of backup players

He agrees that the defense you see on Sept 13 will not resemble anything you have seen in these first two games.

Maybe this is just optimism, but he does understand more about what Meeks is doing than any of us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Now now now, I wouldn't say there is no logic, but there's just not a lot of in-depth thought put into Barnwell's  "analysis." Now to be fair to him (and other national writers), pre-season team rankings are basically clickbait. And...Barnwell, himself, said that "there's a lot of projection here." He basically admits that he doesn't know how the hell things are going to turn out with our receiver group. He also said that "I find myself" more intrigued by Coker than Legette; that does not mean that he said that fans should be, or that Coker will even be better than Legette (regardless of ESPN's per-route-run stat). So, yeah, Barnwell said some things, but even he has to basically admit that he doesn't know how bad or good that our playmakers will be in 2025.  Overall, what Barnwell is basically thinking is that the Panthers have gotten worse at the offensive skill positions, and baked into that is that others have gotten better. That's the argument in July (meaning, please don't give this any more weight than it's due). I would personally be surprised (not shocked) if we end up worse than the Titans, Pats and Giants at least. Once you throw in the Bills, Giants, Jets, Steelers, and even the Chargers, I personally think there are several teams' skill groups that may end up ranked lower than ours by the end of 2025.  @kungfoodudeis one of my dudes, but like others he is over the tipping point. He's had enough. Seeing is believing. I will say this though: Barnwell's piece is less about logic than just good ol' opinion. And to be honest, he might as well be a Huddler throwing out sh¡t in the summer based upon nothing but good feels or bad feels.  Our offense as a whole (just like any other team's) is going to depend upon the play of the O-line and especially the QB. How you can even rank the skill positions without expressly baking those two things in the cake is beyond me. I would dare say that that's not even logical. 
    • Football is not the professional sport where timidness and apprehension are justly rewarded. 
    • Bryce Young had a super high floor definitely at least won't be a bust safe pick we allegedly had seen in some time.......and went on to have one of the worst rookie seasons of all time.  They are all lotto picks.  And that is especially true for whatever they will be day 1 in the NFL.  I don't think Tmac is a sure thing year 1.  It's not like we watched him do his thing in the SEC.  He was a PAC12 guy.  I'm sure it will take time
×
×
  • Create New...