Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lions vs. Cowboys Gameday Thread


PhillyB

Recommended Posts

They scored a quarter billion on us in one half of one quarter. In terms of personnel, we match up better with seattle. We can beat Green Bay, but I don't feel as confident.

 

I gotcha! :thumbsu:

 

I just feel the Panthers offense will have an easier time with GB (unless the weather's awful). And I feel the way the "D" is playing now, even Rogers will struggle.

 

Yes, I feel the Panthers are due beating Seattle indeed. However, something always appears to go wrong when we play those guys. I agree, the law of Averages are on the Panthers side vs Seattle, nonetheless, the game is still being played in Seattle (albeit with better weather than in GB).

 

This is why, I think it's an either or situation (better weather/defense vs freezing conditions/better QB), and I'm not exactly sure how anyone would want to pick one over the other.. :phew:  Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ESPN

Tony Romo has been pressured on 6 of 16 dropbacks and

has been sacked 3 times so far

 

And if Dallas wins he won't have to worry about that again until the NFC Title game if they can get there, which is why they have a chance in Green Bay. 

 

I trust the Cowboys brand to give Green Bay a game in Lambo, and I trust Romo more at this point in frigid weather than I do Cam.

 

Baby steps, please. Seattle is who the Panthers need. Not because of the players, but because of the time of the game and the venue where it will be played. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Green Bay has lost 4 out of its last 6 home playoff games  Seattle has won 6 or 7 in a row at home.  They play in the loudest stadium in the NFL and they have the top defense in the league.  If we can't win in Green Bay, then we can't win in Seattle either.  That being said, I disagree with anyone who says we can't win in either.  But of the two, Seattle is tougher. 

 

Doesn't matter. It's not about the players on the teams. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep he made the comment " I dont know what they were doing out there at that point" in the press conference. Let's be real they all got paid but they also know his system suppresses there offensive potential.
    • Yup the casuals on Facebook ive gotten 85 laughing or angry emojis so far for pointing it out.  The amount of them throwing a fit because the canes were booed is insane  
    • Why are you so fixated on yards? Even if yards were a good judge of QB play, his low yardage totals in some of those games were partly a function of drops (looking at you Xavier Leggette…).  I’m not advocating that Bryce was elite for the last half of last year, but the eye test certainly supported high level QB play for large stretches. He made a lot of high difficulty, put it on the money/drop in the bucket throws. He converted on 3rd and 4th down, kept drives moving, and put the team in position to win games. And it’s not on him that the defense blew it late after he led game tying drives, Leggette dropped a game winning TD, or Chuba fumbled the ball in OT. We could have finished the season close to .500 with wins against 3 playoff teams including KC and Philly during that stretch largely due to Bryce’s play.    Has he sustained this level of play long enough to deserve an higher ranking? No. But for judging based in that stretch alone, he would. But whether he can perform more consistently at that level or build on that, and thus earns a higher ranking, remains to be seen. 
×
×
  • Create New...