Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

To be a Bears fan right now...


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Bruce Arians just finished a second season where loads of people called his performance 'coach of the year' worthy.

 

Why is that relevant in Chicago?

 

Well...

 

“It seemed awkward in Chicago because they wanted me to keep some of their (assistant coaches), which wasn’t going to happen,” Arians said.

 

According to multiple sources, there were many forces at work.

 

The Bears wanted Arians to do one thing: fix quarterback Jay Cutler. They desperately wanted to keep Rod Marinelli as defensive coordinator, believing that side of that ball needed no reform. That was a pipe dream from the start, as Marinelli was extremely close to the fired Lovie Smith and wasn’t going to remain in Chicago under any circumstance.

 

Along the way, a high-ranking Bears official fell in love with Trestman, who kept two members of Smith’s staff: defensive backs coach Jon Hoke and defensive line coach Mike Phair, who was fired after last season.

 

Why the Bears passed on Bruce Arians

 

Since that article was written, both Marc Trestman and the GM who hired him have been handed their pink slips.

 

Now they have a new GM, and he's going to get them John Fox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah but the last line is off.  Saying Smith was a bad firing.

 

 

Chicago is setup for a easy turn around.  Fix the Defense and play conservative with a good running back and two good WR's and they can make a run.  Fox's specialty.

 

I don't know if Matt Forte is the type of "pound-it" back that Fox wants in his backfield. I'm also not sold that they have the OL to do what he wants to do. Based on what I see in CHI and know about Fox, he's got a lot of work to do on the offensive side of the ball. Doesn't seem that they hired a coach to take advantage of what was already there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if Matt Forte is the type of "pound-it" back that Fox wants in his backfield. I'm also not sold that they have the OL to do what he wants to do. Based on what I see in CHI and know about Fox, he's got a lot of work to do on the offensive side of the ball. Doesn't seem that they hired a coach to take advantage of what was already there.

 

They will grab a another veteran running back in free agency. THey have 25 mil in cap space right now,  They can fix the oline with that and draft pick. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if Matt Forte is the type of "pound-it" back that Fox wants in his backfield. I'm also not sold that they have the OL to do what he wants to do. Based on what I see in CHI and know about Fox, he's got a lot of work to do on the offensive side of the ball. Doesn't seem that they hired a coach to take advantage of what was already there.

 

Don't know.  I kinda thought Forte would be the kind of 'workhorse' back that Fox would love to have.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My little brother, a big Bears fan, called me yesterday saying he was trying to be optimistic, didnt want to start bitchin as soon as Fox got hired... I laughed, told him hes fugged..... Foxy & Clausen back together again, what could go wrong??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I keep seeing people make a variation of the comment: "John Fox only won 2 playoff games with Peyton Manning, how can he win with Jay Cutler?"

 

Let's not forget that Fox won 5 playoff games with Delhomme and a playoff game with Tim fuging The Golden Calf of Bristol. Or the fact that Peyton is now 11-13 in the playoffs.

 

Fox can absolutely win with Cutler. I'd argue Cutler is a more talented (in terms of physical talent) than Delhomme. Put him in a ball control offense and take advantage of that arm, and they can easily contend for a WC berth provided Fox shores up the defense (which he tends to do in the early years).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I keep seeing people make a variation of the comment: "John Fox only won 2 playoff games with Peyton Manning, how can he win with Jay Cutler?"

 

Let's not forget that Fox won 5 playoff games with Delhomme and a playoff game with Tim fuging The Golden Calf of Bristol. Or the fact that Peyton is now 11-13 in the playoffs.

 

Fox can absolutely win with Cutler. I'd argue Cutler is a more talented (in terms of physical talent) than Delhomme. Put him in a ball control offense and take advantage of that arm, and they can easily contend for a WC berth provided Fox shores up the defense (which he tends to do in the early years).

 

More talented than Delhomme?  Definitely.

 

But to be fair, Jake was always a high character guy and a solid teammate.

 

Cutler is a bit of a fruit loop.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They will grab a another veteran running back in free agency. THey have 25 mil in cap space right now,  They can fix the oline with that and draft pick. 

 

Yeah, you're probably right about that. I don't really keep up with the cap figures, so it looks like they've got the ability to make some moves to get more in line with what Fox will want to do. You know what Fox doesn't like? A QB like Cutler who doesn't value possession of the football. THAT should be interesting.

 

Think they'll go "BeastMode"?

 

Don't know.  I kinda thought Forte would be the kind of 'workhorse' back that Fox would love to have.

 

 

Yeah, I could see that, but for whatever reason I've always gotten the feeling/assumed that Forte was that shifty guy who either wasn't good at or didn't want to run between the tackles and get pound out 3-4 yards a clip.  I could be totally wrong and it was just a matter of the way he's been used, just never saw him as a time of possession/workhorse back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...