Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Colts are gonna royally fug their salary cap


Dexterity

Recommended Posts

He's earned it. We we're so close to drafting him, but he clearly didn't want to come here. Ask the Saints what happens when you pay your QB too much.

After 3 years, Andrew Luck has...

4 more wins vs .500+ teams

6 more touchdowns

8 more turnovers

...than Cam Newton had after 3 years

ALL HAIL ANDREW LUGOAT

His 16-2 W/L & stat stuffing against the atrocious AFCS has really, really, really turned him into a mythical creature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeh, every single team that has paid their quarterbacks have made it so they cant close the deal afterwards.

Peyton haters can say he couldnt close the deal but it was his enormous cap figure that hamstrung the colts.

Teams have tried to get smarter with Flaccos deal making a cap of less than 15 million for a few years or Kaeps deal where its really a year to year contract.

Still, you just cant have a player making 1/5 or more of the salary cap and win a Superbowl.

Until someone proves me wrong, and that will be the exception, its a law.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Luck has won 11 games every year being in the league with a sub par supporting cast and bottom of the league defense. I don't think they are going to have any issues.

16-2 vs AFCS

17-13 vs everybody else

As long as HOU, TEN, & JAX stay in the bottom 5 of the NFL he will continue to rack up meaningless wins & stats in the regular season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16-2 vs AFCS

17-13 vs everybody else

As long as HOU, TEN, & JAX stay in the bottom 5 of the NFL he will continue to rack up meaningless wins & stats in the regular season.

 

The NFCS was bad this year, what was Cam's record against them? We cannot continue to discredit those wins when even we cannot get those wins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I feel like this trade just lives rent free in people's heads and keeps morphing into different things. First thing is that the rumored trade was for future firsts. They wouldn't have any extra picks in 2023; the firsts would have been for 2024 and 2025. With very few exceptions, NFL GMs don't value picks that far away. You have to have a lot of job security to pull that off. Like Chiefs, Eagles, Rams kinda stability. That's obviously not the case with David Tepper, especially since he'd just fired his head coach. No GM except for like Howie Roseman is going to trade an asset you have now for a future asset you probably get to use.  Second, at the time you'd have to assume these are first rounders late in the first round. Obviously currency is currency and the panthers need young players, but these weren't slam dunk top ten picks. At the end of the day there's one pick that separates a first and second round pick.  Lastly, the only place that ever reported this trade was the Rams. All the reporters just repeated what McVay said and it became gospel. We have no idea how serious the negotiations were, if they ever really happened, if the offer was real, etc. And I personally believe McVay and Sneed are the kind of guys who would make up rumors like that to fug up other teams, mostly because I assume if I've thought of it someone smarter than me has.  I don't know how you'd call it the greatest draft haul of all time. Firsts quickly lose their value the farther out they are and Burns had 16.5 sacks last season. And anyway those picks would probably just been tossed into the burning inferno of the Bryce trade up so it's a moot point anyway. 
×
×
  • Create New...