Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Non Hornets related. .

WOW!!

By WOW!!,
in Charlotte Hornets

Recommended Posts

WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted

I was having a discussion with a Pelican fan about the Chris Paul trade to the Lakers that the league blocked..

He felt the league screwed NO by not letting them make that trade.. I said they saved them from giving the Lakers a Championship for a bag of chips (see Memphis trade of Gasol)... What is your opinion. .

Now in the Lakers trade they would have gotten Odoms, Scola, Martin, Dragic and a pick from the Lakers I think...

They got from the Clippers Eric Gordon, Kaman and a pick from the Clippers. .

Hindsight 20 20 Dragic would have been nice to have.. but at the time Gordon was a ascending young talent and Kaman was a back to the basket big man (which not many teams have now).. I also don't know if they would have gotten A Davis if they were a better team and the NBA didn't screw us.. Because with the Lakers trade they would have had Healthier players..Since Gordon and Kaman have been injury prone since playing in NO..

So I still feel they got saved by the Nba for blocking that trade..what do you guys think...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Omega Atrocity Newbie

Omega Atrocity

Posted
Posted

Dragic didn't break out until 2012-13, before that he was considered a pretty good backup. The Clippers deal was better, just because of Gordon's potential. Unfortunately for NO, they matched a big contract that he hasn't been able to stay healthy for hardly any of. When a star player wants out, and will bolt after the season anyway, teams aren't generally going to give up anything of real value (unless LeBron is your GM).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rmoneyg35 Proficient

rmoneyg35

Posted
Posted

I never understood why the trade was blocked. I do believe the lakers would be a better team and more than likely the clippers would still suck. The trade was the reason why they have Steve Nash who signed a big contract and has hardly even played which really hurt the lakers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
  • Author
Posted

What do you mean the gasol trade was a championship for a bag of chips? Marc is better than Pau in his prime and he's only getting better

The Grizzlie's traded Pau for Kawme Brown and the pick ended up being Marc.. but in reality they gave up a all star talent coming in his prime...for a bag chips... and got lucky nobody picked Marc earlier in that draft. . The Lakers got 2 titles from that move...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MichaelNewtonII Contributor

MichaelNewtonII

Posted
Posted

The Grizzlie's traded Pau for Kawme Brown and the pick ended up being Marc.. but in reality they gave up a all star talent coming in his prime...for a bag chips... and got lucky nobody picked Marc earlier in that draft. . The Lakers got 2 titles from that move...

i believe the lakers drafted marc and they traded his rights to memphis
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PiratePanther189 Newbie

PiratePanther189

Posted
Posted

I think it's neither saved nor screwed...both trades sucked simply because no trade that NO could've made at the time would've been able to equal or cancel losing CP3. Eric Gordon may have been a better option, but he still even at that time was still Brandon Roy 2.0

 

I actually think CP3 doesn't get enough sh*t for forcing his way out of there. I love the guy, but as much crap as Melo and LBJ get it surprises me that no one ever says anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mr. Scot
      Why does Bryce get the blame?

      By Mr. Scot · Posted

      Nope Still missing it. Let's try this a different way... You have two quarterbacks from schools that ran the same kind of offense - maybe even two from the same school - on a given team (not necessarily the Panthers). One is designated the starter while the other is named the backup. Why?
    • CRA
      Why does Bryce get the blame?

      By CRA · Posted

      yeah, pretty sure boss.....when things match and fit in the NFL.....the results then show it.  and when they don't, well, the results show that as well.  Bryce doesn't fit.   *but I get why late season and wants to argue with everyone Mr. Scot has also turned into a please don't talk to me about stats guy as well.  Given, the stats that reflect offensive productivity work against all your present arguments. 
    • Mr. Scot
      Why does Bryce get the blame?

      By Mr. Scot · Posted

      Yeeeah...stats and rankings have zero to do with a discussion of scheme and skill set match. Maybe look up definitions of style vs ability and see if that helps. At this point, you've basically had three different people explain to you where you're wrong, but rather than addressing any of those statements, you're just resorting to straight deflection.  You don't get it. Either that or you're acting like you don't get it so that you can avoid the discussion because it's not going well for you. (that wouldn't surprise me either) 😄 Sme result either way, I suppose.
×
×
  • Create New...