Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Vic Beasley


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

Couple things. Lathon was gone by the time Davis got here. Also, Davis started his rookie year out at safety. He got torched in coverage and was moved to the bench to be used in a "joker" role for the rest of the year. It was only after his rookie year that they decided that he should be moved to OLB because in the offseason he asked Mark Fields' permission to switch from 47 to 58 (Fields' old number that was thought to be semi-retired because of the Keep Pounding campaign).

Davis was always a good spy on the QB (we drafted him to stop Michael Vick, and it worked) which gave him the illusion of being ok in coverage. In reality, he was just faster than the guys he was in the box against. On an island, he gets exposed. Nothing wrong with that at LB.

did we run a 3-4 back then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is a pretty weak Draft. there are a few standouts but so far it's pretty easy to see who the best 10 or 15 players are and then there's a drop off the ledge.

I guess we have to hope that one of the true OT falls to us that can start from day one. I just don't have any hope that there's a stud safety or DB that is worth a first rounder.

I also can't agree with drafting a #2 WR in the first round.

I'm pretty disappointed. because of how terrible the NFCS was this past year, they are gonna get the impact players, even though we were only separated from most of them by a single win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Beasley played with his hand down, standing up, rushing inside, rushing outside, dabbled in coverage. He was a playmaker. Playmakers with his tool set don't last until the end of round 1.

Beasley also disappeared a fair amount and feasted against some weak talent

and he I stick by the fact he hasn't shown pre draft the ability to be the type 3-4 OLB Von Miller did while in college.

Beasley does have talent. Not arguing that. Arguing how it will fit. I think teams that run a 4-3 won't have him near as high as a 3-4 and those 3-4 teams are going to use him in an unproven way

Link to comment
Share on other sites

teams quit challenging his side of the field a lot too. I agree he may have mailed it in a bit, but like I said earlier, he was draft ready as a sophomore.

Bc of his athleticism he is one of the best pure pass rushers to come out of Clemson in some time. I'd only put him around 3rd in the last 10 years as an overall DE out of Clemson. He struggles getting of blocks against good talent and isn't special against the run.

I wouldnt say he was draft ready as a sophomore. His overall game wasn't that good. Just the sexy speed move

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bc of his athleticism he is one of the best pure pass rushers to come out of Clemson in some time. I'd only put him around 3rd in the last 10 years as an overall DE out of Clemson. He struggles getting of blocks against good talent and isn't special against the run.

I wouldnt say he was draft ready as a sophomore. His overall game wasn't that good. Just the sexy speed move

he's better suited as an OLB that can blitz, imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Derrick Brown was one player I never called or even suggested was a bust . Dude was young and hadn't even hit his stride. It takes time to learn the position. The thing I appreciated about him is that he kept improving season after season. He got paid and keeps on going like the Energizer Bunny.
    • How many teams coddle their QB the way Bryce has been coddled? I have never seen any other team in the NFL EVER baby a QB the way that Bryce has been.  Bryce was named day 1 starter his first year. It was obvious he didnt deserve it. He wasnt ready as evidenced by the worst rookie year in NFL history.  So let's move to year 2. He's named starter again with no competition in TC and is benched 2 games later. We have the ghost of a backup in Dalton who is so bad he can only beat Vegas and let's remember, the only reason he lost his starting job was a car accident, not because Bryce actually beat him out in practice.  And year 3. We sign Dalton again, who already proved he couldn't be depended on to put an even remotely passable performance on the field, and bring back Jack Plummer, who was even worse than last year. It was obvious he was nothing more than a pretend body in an attempt to create an illusion of some type of attempt to find a backup.  Then we start again with garbage play again and Bryce gets benched with a phantom injury, and the ghost of the ghost of Dalton breaks his thumb on the first drive and craps the field all over again. If we had actually made an attempt to find a legitimate QB2, it's possible Bryce doesn't step on the field again. Bryce is not agood QB and if we had any other mediocre QB, our record would be the same or better.  Bryce is not entrenched. He's been placed, protected and sheltered from ever having to face a  real QB competition in TC. Richardson and Levis both were ass and both were benched and eventually replaced.  Do I expect Baker to face competition in camp? Sure. I expect Tampa to find the best QB2 they can at price that fits their cap and resources and system and get him up to speed. If he's better than Baker, and if he's better by a significant margin, that's best for the team. The ultimate goal is a Super Bowl. Bellichek was constantly getting QB2s with the GOAT as his starter. He knew the value and that was realized when Cassell led them to an 11-5 record as a backup.  You and I may think differently than the people that matter but I will say it again. If you're afraid to bring in a capable backup, especially after the debacle of last year. The starting role wasn't earned, it was given, and that's loser mentality.
    • I would have done the same thing.  LSU is a much better job than Ole Miss.  Plus the enormous contract and every advantage a college team can offer in terms of recruiting and facilities and tradition etc 
×
×
  • Create New...