Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam's Contract


Toker Smurf

Recommended Posts

Does Olsen's extension provide any clues to Cam's contract? I'm not a cap expert, even by Huddle standards but I think it might. The fact that we have to reach this spending threshold and the large signing bonus given to Olsen could be point to how Cam's contract will be structured. Supposedly we will have around $60 million in cap space in 2016 (granted due partially to having fewer players under contract). We've heard that Cam doesn't want a contract like Kapernick. If Gettleman is willing to give Cam a huge signing bonus and take a large cap hit in 2016, it may entice Cam to take less overall and keep the team from having to back load the deal, as much. Obviously there is risk, if something were to happen to Cam but not hamstringing the team down the road quite as much would be a big benefit for sustained success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't, but what it shows is that the panthers are going to be giving out large signing bonuses because they have to spend a ton cash the next two seasons to hit nfl minimum.

Exactly this. Someone posted yesterday about the 89% minimum and it really explained a lot. Basically, we need to spend 89% of the salary cap over 4 years (ending in 2016...going in to 2017) in CASH. Not spend that % of the cap but spend it in cash. Basically bonuses and dead money as I understand it (which is limited of course).

So the 12 mil that we just spent on Greg count all up front towards the 89% even tho the cap hit of it spread out over the length of the contract. So when we sign cam and Luke before 2017 there will be a ton of guaranteed money that will easily put us over the 89%.

So the only question left is all that dead money (cash) for Luke and Cam worth it? Well Luke has never been hurt I don't think and even if he was would anyone say his dead money isn't worth it since everyone wants him to be a panther forever a la Ray Lewis and the Ravens?

And then there's Cam. I recognize but don't agree with some fans that aren't sold on him. But having said that, in my opinion, he is a franchise QB and will get paid a metric shite ton of money to include a large amount of cash (signing bonus, dead money). DG has said as much. I believe he is the most durable and prototypical of "running" QBs and even though our OL has him running for his life, he rarely misses a game. 2 I think. One for broken ribs. One for a fluke car accident. One for that. Seriously?

So the likelihood that he's continually out costing us dead money (like a running back or two) is slim.

So in the end, we don't need to worry about the 89% or the dead money we will be giving Cam and Luke. And Gerg's back laden contract must be thought of in the context of a salary cap that raises by 10 mil every year. And in that context, so must every other contract we ink. I like where we are at and where we're going. This team is set up for sustained excellence...assuming at some point we get a LT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't, but what it shows is that the panthers are going to be giving out large signing bonuses because they have to spend a ton cash the next two seasons to hit nfl minimum.

 

That's an interesting concept.  Must look further into that.  Thanks for the insight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Then don't tune in. It's really not a hard concept to understand, if your making your decision based on your own personal needs/feelings as opposed to what is best for the future of the franchise, then it's a you problem, not a Panthers problem. When the season is already lost, every fan should be rooting for the same thing.  The team plays hard until the final whistle of the season and keeps improving as a team and individually, but in the end, we still come up short and lose games, and preferably because the other team beat us, not because we screwed up and found a way to lose due to our own fault. Look at it this way... If we are up 1 or 2 points with 3 seconds left in the game and the other team is lining up for a FG.  Beyond the joy of victory or the disappointment of defeat, what impact does the other team making or missing the FG have on our team the following season? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING Except where we draft and what teams we play due to our finish in the division. The players and coaches on the team would have the exact same level of improvement and learnings about themselves individually and as a team whether the FG is made or missed.  The ONLY difference in the end is the record in the standings and if the win or loss number changes. If you want to argue if making the playoffs to lose in the first round or just missing them is better or worse, that's totally fair and I can at least understand the other side of it.  But in what is already a lost season, if you're not hoping your team plays well but ends up losing, then you're cutting off your nose to spite your face.  You're hoping for a moment of happiness at the detriment of the franchise's future, and in turn, you're basically then happy for a moment to only set yourself up for future further disappointment.
    • If we’re eliminated I want the wins more.   The season is already a disappointment and if I’m not pulling for wins why bother to tune in?
    • Two things terribly wrong with this post. First is that not one time has myself or anyone else agreeing with me said that the team themselves should think that way or try and lose for positioning.  Never once have I suggested the team should purposefully lose games, ever.  I honestly can't understand why people keep saying this in posts, not one fan has ever said the players should or would purposefully try to lose. And second, is yes, that has happened and it's happened very recently.  The 2020 Bengals were 4-11-1 and then were playing in the SB the very next season.   And while it might have been 2 years later and they didn't quite get to the SB, the 2021 Lions were 3-13-1 and then the 2023 Lions were up 24-7 at halftime of the NFC Championship game. The season between those two? They finished 9-8 and only just missed the playoffs. Which is why I keep trying to compare us to the Lions in where we are at in our re-build.  Throw out Bryce's rookie year with the Reich staff who just didn't work out and he looked god awful.   This past season when we were 5-12 in Canales' 1st season is that 2021 season for the Lions and their 1st season under Campbell.  This year is their 2022 where they grew a ton and Campbell's culture building was clear, where I'm saying we'd likely be better off in the long run if we go 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss out on the playoffs (which is still a significant improvement from last year).  Then our 2026 is their 2024 when we have a chance to be a real contender after adding a few more pieces and our key players having another year of experience under their belts.
×
×
  • Create New...