Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Opinions


BigCat

Recommended Posts

Every ncaa team also has two starting wr. That doesn't mean they all graduate or have nfl ability. Your argument is beyond dumb.

I hear ya,...just know that there may not be a OT in this draft that starts this year.

So why should we draft a guy that we know wont start for a year or two and go for a guy that will definitely start this year and find an OT in the later rounds that we can build up and gain some cohesion with his line mates?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every ncaa team also has two starting wr. That doesn't mean they all graduate or have nfl ability. Your argument is beyond dumb.

I have to comment again about your statement...WRs can be found in UDFA and the bargain bin...see Corey Brown etc. heck...we were dominating teams once our rag tag line got healthy and comfortable and Tolbert and Stew got healthy.

dumb is a term used for thise who cant speak. GFY

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think the team sees Oher or Martin as long-term solutions. Just look at their contracts for proof of that. If one or both works out, fantastic! But, I don't think we'll pass on OTs that we like simply because we have Oher and Martin.

Very well put.

I think what OP may be on to is the fact that DG grabbed Oher and Martin so he is not boxed in at taking (reaching) for a tackle at 25. DG keeps harping about BPA. At the end of the day BPA is the guy available at your pick who you think can help you win the most games with him on the roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is what I see as illogical.  Everyone thinking that we are drafting a LT because Oher and Martin are suspect.  A rookie LT probably does not help in 2015 very much. 

 

Another illogical assumption people make:  We draft and give 4-year contracts to players based on 2015 needs.  SInce rookies often take a season or two to develop, that is just plain stupid at some positions, like OT.

 

Gettlemen has said that he is drafting for 2016, not 2015, and frankly, any good GM should draft by anticipating needs at positions that take time to season players.  OT, DE, and WR are positions that typically take a year or two.  

 

So if you are looking at OTs who can play right away, any in the first round are probably going to struggle.  However, if you have a T who can hold down the fort until a developmental OT gets his strength and technique down, you take one a bit later. 

 

That is not to say that we won't draft a T in the first, but it is probably to say that the OT in the first round will hopefully not play until 2016.,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think the team sees Oher or Martin as long-term solutions.  Just look at their contracts for proof of that.  If one or both works out, fantastic!  But, I don't think we'll pass on OTs that we like simply because we have Oher and Martin.

yes, we need a stop gap as we train younger ot's.Now is the time .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes, we need a stop gap as we train younger ot's.Now is the time .

its all anout wether the FO see's some players they like and want to bring into the fold. Thats what its all about.

Thee are starting playmakers do ne drafted on both sides of the ball in the first few rounds...starting caliber.

The NFCS isnt getting any better and yes, now would be an appropriate time to grab some future starters who may not be ready for a couple years.

We have to get some offensive playmakers And shore up our run defense now and Id wager thats our thinking going into this draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

its all anout wether the FO see's some players they like and want to bring into the fold. Thats what its all about.

Thee are starting playmakers do ne drafted on both sides of the ball in the first few rounds...starting caliber.

The NFCS isnt getting any better and yes, now would be an appropriate time to grab some future starters who may not be ready for a couple years.

We have to get some offensive playmakers And shore up our run defense now and Id wager thats our thinking going into this draft.

 

it has less  to do with the NFCS than it has to do with short term older OL players who will not be here long.starting caliber doesn't have to mean starting this season.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it has less to do with the NFCS than it has to do with short term older OL players who will not be here long.starting caliber doesn't have to mean starting this season.

The playoffs start with the NFCS and from there its anyones game.

Yes...we need some true talent on the line, in the secondary, in rush defense and some talent at thr receiver position...none if which are necessarily needed to win the division.

Most of our posiions of need, we are buying in FA and waiting on our kind of guys to be drafted for sustainability.

luckily, this draft is mostly about insurance rather that need

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep he made the comment " I dont know what they were doing out there at that point" in the press conference. Let's be real they all got paid but they also know his system suppresses there offensive potential.
    • Yup the casuals on Facebook ive gotten 85 laughing or angry emojis so far for pointing it out.  The amount of them throwing a fit because the canes were booed is insane  
    • Why are you so fixated on yards? Even if yards were a good judge of QB play, his low yardage totals in some of those games were partly a function of drops (looking at you Xavier Leggette…).  I’m not advocating that Bryce was elite for the last half of last year, but the eye test certainly supported high level QB play for large stretches. He made a lot of high difficulty, put it on the money/drop in the bucket throws. He converted on 3rd and 4th down, kept drives moving, and put the team in position to win games. And it’s not on him that the defense blew it late after he led game tying drives, Leggette dropped a game winning TD, or Chuba fumbled the ball in OT. We could have finished the season close to .500 with wins against 3 playoff teams including KC and Philly during that stretch largely due to Bryce’s play.    Has he sustained this level of play long enough to deserve an higher ranking? No. But for judging based in that stretch alone, he would. But whether he can perform more consistently at that level or build on that, and thus earns a higher ranking, remains to be seen. 
×
×
  • Create New...