Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mayock now sees 7 WRs going in the 1st R (previously, on Apr 10, it was 6)


gettlemanjack

Recommended Posts

Previously, he said: "I've got eight wide receivers with potential first-round grades. Of those eight, I think six will go in the first round," Mayock said

today he said:

SiriusXM NFL Radio @ SiriusXMNFL

6h

Mike Mayock : I think this is an outstanding WR class...I could

see 7 guys going in the 1st round.

on his Big Board released yesterday, Mayock grades the WRs:

...Top 7:

3. Kevin White, WR, West Virginia

4. Amari Cooper, WR, Alabama

9. DeVante Parker, WR, Louisville

15. Breshad Perriman, WR, UCF

23. Nelson Agholor, WR, USC

31. Dorial Green-Beckham, WR, Missouri

34. Phillip Dorsett, WR, Miami (Fla.)

...and then:

38. Jaelen Strong, WR, Arizona State

(we pick at #57)

57. Devin Smith, WR, Ohio State

65. Devin Funchess, WR, Michigan

70. Tyler Lockett, WR, Kansas State

71. Sammie Coates, WR, Auburn

74. Rashad Greene, WR, Florida State

88. Tre McBride, WR, William & Mary

(we pick at #89)

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000488358/article/2015-nfl-draft-mike-mayocks-top-100-prospects

Mayock on this year's WR class:

April 26

“I think that wide receiver and running back are elite, really good at the top end and depth throughout. The quarterback, tight end and safety classes are poor. The other classes are closer to average. That's a quick overview.”

http://www.detroitlions.com/news/lions-insider/article-1/QA-with-NFL-Network-analyst-Mike-Mayock/7f66cad6-fe1e-4636-bd32-4ff442152890

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Deeper =/= Stronger, necessarily. 

 

Here's my biggest problem with waiting to address the WR position in the mid rounds: We already have a roster full of #3, 4, 5 receivers. We need someone to step in immediately and push Kelvin and give Cam another legitimate threat in the passing game. I have my doubts that a back end of third or fourth round rookie can step in and be an improvement over Cotchery, Ginn, Philly, or whoever else. Right now outside of Cam, Kelvin, and Olsen...defenses don't have a whole lot to game plan for or fear for that matter. Hopefully that changes on Thursday night. Precisely why I'd love Agholor, Perriman, or Dorsett in Charlotte because they bring things to the table that no one else on this roster does. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm also somehow someway more comfortable with Oher, Martin, Remmers + any mid round rookies being a serviceable tackle unit than I am Cotchery being a number two in this offense yet again. If that happens, we once again see a lack of big plays, we see Kelvin being doubled or defended by #1 corners, the focus heavy on Olsen, and a struggle to pick up third and longs in the passing game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We can only hope the teams that missed out on the WR class last year try to make up for it this year. Would aid in having a solid OT or defensive prospect fall.

At this point I'm actually getting tried of not getting Cam weapons. .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, Gettleman said the WR class was deeper this year but he also said that he thinks last year's class would prove to be unique. I'm assuming he meant unique in terms of elite talent.

 

I think you're onto something here. It is a deep class. But it also has quite a few great talents at the top of the board and throughout back half of the first/second. I think Dorsett and Smith, as late first or early second round talents, bring some elite traits to the board in speed and the ability to get vertical and track the deep ball. Big play potential is a premium in the NFL. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Per Adam Schefter: https://x.com/AdamSchefter/status/1920523706624823739 Expected, but just want to rub it in here.
    • I try to keep up and project the roster with color-coded charts.  You can see priorities and gauge who has the best chance of making the roster--you can see the priorities as well.  Here, Yellow is a 2025 draft pick, green is an undrafted free agent, and orange is a free agent. The depth chart will obviously change and I am not sure about roles (positions in all cases), so that is not the real issue at this time, but yellows and oranges show how the team focused on which aspects of the defense:     In the front 5, there were 3 draft picks, 3 free agents (not including players we re-signed), and two undrafted players signed. In the back 6, there was 1 draft pick and 2 free agents (LB, S), and four undrafted free agents. The undrafted free agents are always long shots, but by identifying them, you can tell which longshots might make the roster.
    • The rise of analytics in sports goes back to the use of sabermetrics in baseball.  The ironic thing is that the whole point of Bill James work was to objectively figure out each players contribution to to a team's wins throughout the season.  This is possible in baseball because each at bat is essentially a 1v1 with an objective outcome.  Applying statistical averages also works a lot better with hundreds of plate appearances over 162 games a year. PFF grades plays subjectively, and then puts them into buckets.  They then create different statistics based on those buckets.  That's all well and good and I'm not saying it's useless.  But calling it analytics like it's some kind of objective science is a far cry from what is actually going on.
×
×
  • Create New...