Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Seahawks offer Wilson a deal in the range of Cam Newton's

hepcat

By hepcat,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Moorgan Enthusiast

Moorgan

Posted
Posted

I'm starting to think something different when it comes to this. A few tweets have come out.(http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/06/30/now-that-russell-wilson-said-a-number-his-agents-pumping-it-up/)

Wilson said he wants $25M and his agent said he wish he would've said $40M.

Im starting to think RW is playing chicken...and might win. What I mean by this, as I haven't gotten all my thoughts together on this, is I'm reminded of the lock outs in any sport. The one thing that seems to happen in every lockout or strike is the players cave. In the end, the players aren't willing to go for long without a paycheck.

I think RW has decided he actually can't lose in this and can win this game of chicken. Assuming he stays healthy of course, he will eventually get what he wants...and the owners actually can't do anything about it...if he doesn't blink.

The problem is every player before RW has either blinked or bought into the conventional NFL way of doing things. In a way, if he doesn't blink, this could be a historic negotiation. 

The fact that his agent is a baseball guy plays into this a little more. I'm not saying I agree with what may happen or that its results are good or bad...for players, for owners or for the Seahawks. Just that this actually could be groundbreaking because RW may not blink...and that doesn't really seem to happen...certainly not with QBs.

He could force the Seahawks into what he wants eventually or another team will give him what he wants. I think it's actually getting interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
FootballMaestro Newbie

FootballMaestro

Posted
Posted

Russell Wilson's hoping the tremendously wealthy and fun/carefree (in other aspects of his life) Paul Allen, will ignore his football people, and give him a "solid".

If I'm the Hawks: I do what MHS said above, regarding grooming another QB as his replacement. It would be NFL suicide IMHO opinion, paying RW between $20-$25 mil a year.

Nonetheless, it's the beast that Seattle created (no pun intended to the real Straw That Stirs The Drink Marshawn)!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

I'm starting to think something different when it comes to this. A few tweets have come out.(http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/06/30/now-that-russell-wilson-said-a-number-his-agents-pumping-it-up/)

Wilson said he wants $25M and his agent said he wish he would've said $40M.

Im starting to think RW is playing chicken...and might win. What I mean by this, as I haven't gotten all my thoughts together on this, is I'm reminded of the lock outs in any sport. The one thing that seems to happen in every lockout or strike is the players cave. In the end, the players aren't willing to go for long without a paycheck.

I think RW has decided he actually can't lose in this and can win this game of chicken. Assuming he stays healthy of course, he will eventually get what he wants...and the owners actually can't do anything about it...if he doesn't blink.

The problem is every player before RW has either blinked or bought into the conventional NFL way of doing things. In a way, if he doesn't blink, this could be a historic negotiation. 

The fact that his agent is a baseball guy plays into this a little more. I'm not saying I agree with what may happen or that its results are good or bad...for players, for owners or for the Seahawks. Just that this actually could be groundbreaking because RW may not blink...and that doesn't really seem to happen...certainly not with QBs.

He could force the Seahawks into what he wants eventually or another team will give him what he wants. I think it's actually getting interesting.

Baseball agent... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ctrcat Newbie

ctrcat

Posted
Posted

The Hawks should take him up on that.

Screwed either way.  Doesn't matter.  No more Cam throwing a game winner in the dirt the week after the most maddening loss in franchise history, no more DeAngelo fumbling inside the 10, no more playing with one arm behind our back.  Our time is now, in a big way, for a long time.  No matter what they do.

I still LOVE it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Servant of Cthululelei Newbie

Servant of Cthululelei

Posted
Posted

Didn't take me too long. Now the blind homers that still defend him are insanely annoying.

Another NC State grad here - I haven't paid a lot of attention to the goings on of this negotiation, so maybe I missed something major, but ultimately I believe the people who think they can glean the true character of a person based on the actions they take during a multi-million dollar contract negotiation are the ones who are blind.

Yes, Russell Wilson's squeaky-clean persona is calculated.  I stopped reading articles written about him and interviews with him a long time ago because, to be perfectly honest, they are boring as fug. That's definitely intentional on Russell's part. But I don't doubt for a second the guy's faith is an integral part of his character, as that's how he was all throughout college too, when it looked like he didn't have much of a real chance at an NFL career at all, let alone such a wildly successful one.  Russell's faith doesn't necessarily make him good or bad on it's own - I'm not religious so that doesn't register as a pro or a con in my book. And yeah, I'll admit that the amount that he talks about his religion is annoying. But he definitely DOES use a significant portion of his time and resources in a charitable fashion - that's not disputable. Whether or not that's all "fake" doesn't really matter to me, because it's still using his influence in a positive way. So Russell is still a "good" person in my book.

I personally think people are just sick of how much praise the guy gets, which is understandable.  He's not perfect, or even anywhere close to it, but a lot of the media likes to paint him that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      The running back situation....

      By strato · Posted

      okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Captain Morgan
      OTA's

      By Captain Morgan · Posted

      Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • WUnderhill
      Myles Garrett Traded to Rams

      By WUnderhill · Posted

      How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...