Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If this offseason had played out like this...


WOW!!

Recommended Posts

If the offseason  had played out with 2 different moves made would we be a better Team this year and going forward... 

1. You still trade Lance for Hawes and Barnes contract.. 

2. You still trade Barnes contract for Lamb.. 

3. You still sign Lin.. 

4. You still let Bismack walk.. 

Now the 2 different  moves.. 

1. You don't trade Vonleh or Hendo for a 1 year rental of Batum...  If Portland doesn't want the Cody - Hendo deal then walk away  from the table..  Don't  lose Vonleh at all.. IMO Portland would have called back after seeing Lma and Matthews walk out the door..  So you still could have ended up with Batum without losing Vonleh... 

2. Draft Miles Turner over Frank..  You  have a young 2 way player that can take over for Al in a year..  In stead of a pretty good stretch 4..  Which  you have now... 

Our team next year would have a potentially great front court  for the future  in MKG, Vonleh,  and Turner ...  You could have a team like this

Pg -  Kemba, Lin and Robinson 

Sg- Hendo,  Lamb,  Harrison   and  Daniels

SF -  MKG,  Marvin,  Pj

PF -  Cody,  Vonleh,  Hawes 

C -  Al,  and Turner 

And you still have the mid level  exception to get another wing player if needed ... 

Isn't this a better roster now and going forward than we have now? 

You would go into next year with Cap space and a foundation of

Kemba, MKG,  Vonleh,  Turner and Hawes..  And you can build around this... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^^ I have been a defender of Hendo on here for so long- and to see him back in our lineup makes me sick.. Batum is gonna be great for us this year, count on it. And i have grown to like the Kaminsky pick more and more..

the Hawes deal is the one im not too thrilled with- mainly because the years we are locked into with him. I wish we could have swung Lance for something better but im sure we were anxious to unload him ASAP.

if we can manage to trade Marvin's expiring for something of value around the trade deadline- we could make a push into the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kaminsky is a natural center like Turner, he just plays like a stretch 4, and it's too early to say whether or not those two will be any good. I think drafting Winslow would have stuck more to the previous idea Cho had with the roster. 

This is how I would have run this offseason, for the record. But the problem is you're essentially banking on Lance being the sole cause of what went wrong last season. Not only that, but the 2014 season we tried to build on was such an anomaly, there's no guarantee everything just clicks again, especially without McBob and with Al seemingly a major injury away from retirement.

The offense would still be unwatchable, Vonleh, Winslow, Lamb, etc would still be long term projects that wouldn't have playing time, and we still probably get stuck drafting 9th again.

IMO it all depends on how much of an impact Batum makes. If he is the upgrade from Henderson we traded for him to be, we could sneak up on the East and have the season we were expected to have last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kevin skis what i natural center like Turner, he just plays like a stretch 4, and it's too early to say whether or not those two will be any good. I think drafting Winslow would have stuck more to the previous idea Cho had with the roster. 

This is how I would have run this offseason, for the record. But the problem is you're essentially banking on Lance being the sole cause of what went wrong last season. Not only that, but the 2014 season we tried to build on was such an anomaly, there's no guarantee everything just clicks again, especially without McBob and with Al seemingly a major injury away from retirement.

The offense would still be unwatchable, Vonleh, Winslow, Lamb, etc would still be long term projects that wouldn't have playing time, and we still probably get stuck drafting 9th again.

IMO it all depends on how much of an impact Batum makes. If he is the upgrade from Henderson we traded for him to be, we could sneak up on the East and have the season we were expected to have last year.

Even if Batum is better than expected... 

Are you willing to pay him a Max deal to keep him?

Which is what I  think it will take to keep him..  If he out does expectations... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nay Portland gives up Batum after LMA walks and they lose everyone but Lillard. Maybe giving up Vonleh was too much, but Batum should play well in Charlotte.

 

So I ask you..  Was that worth a one year rental or a Max deal??  Even if we ccouldn't get him without Vonleh..  Is he worth losing after the season and if he plays well is he truly  worth a max deal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I ask you..  Was that worth a one year rental or a Max deal??  Even if we ccouldn't get him without Vonleh..  Is he worth losing after the season and if he plays well is he truly  worth a max deal?

personally i dont get why the Hornets FO would trade Vonleh after one year, so that part of the deal will never make sense to me. but its not a bad trade if he plays well and gets a long term deal. or trade him at the all star break if he is truly having a breakout year and there is no way to extend him with the cap situation. (idk what the Hornets cap situation is)

 

e: if you could get him for just Henderson and not Vonleh, even if it was a one year deal, that would be worth it IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

people dsonally i dont get why the Hornets FO would trade Vonleh after one year, so that part of the deal will never make sense to me. but its not a bad trade if he plays well and gets a long term deal. or trade him at the all star break if he is truly having a breakout year and there is no way to extend him with the cap situation. (idk what the Hornets cap situation is)

 

e: if you could get him for just Henderson and not Vonleh, even if it was a one year deal, that would be worth it IMO.

 

No doubt... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

So I ask you..  Was that worth a one year rental or a Max deal??  Even if we ccouldn't get him without Vonleh..  Is he worth losing after the season and if he plays well is he truly  worth a max deal?

Vonleh is no guarantee, and based off what little we saw from him last year, he has a long way to go. 

Also, no way Batum is getting a max deal even in this market. I'm sure the front office has already discussed possible terms, or we wouldn't have made the trade if he wasn't willing to re-sign here.

If eeverything falls apart, the roster is set up to self-destruct this offseason minus a few younger players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vonleh is no guarantee, and based off what little we saw from him last year, he has a long way to go. 

Also, no way Batum is getting a max deal even in this market. I'm sure the front office has already discussed possible terms, or we wouldn't have made the trade if he wasn't willing to re-sign here.

If eeverything falls apart, the roster is set up to self-destruct this offseason minus a few younger players.

I'm not so sure. If things play out as predicted, he will be a max type player, whether we agree with the market value or not.

He is a complete player: he can shoot, pass, has prototypical size, and plays defense at a high level.

He also is coming to a situation where he will be more relied upon to be a scorer. Sparing injury or pulling a Lance, Batum's production/numbers will only increase, driving up his value even more.

I believe only superstars deserve max money, but in a talent driven league, particularly when your team is in a small market...you have to pay up or someone else will. We have seen what has happened in this free agency period.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vander is no guarantee, and based off what little we saw from him last year, he has a long way to go. 

Also, no way Batum is getting a max deal even in this market. I'm sure the front office has already discussed possible terms, or we wouldn't have made the trade if he wasn't willing to re-sign here.

If eeverything falls apart, the roster is set up to self-destruct this offseason minus a few younger players.

 

Kanter just got a max offer...  Let that sink in... 

 

 

 

Now if Batum has a better than his Avg..  Season he will be looking for the Max... 

 

 

Kanter just got a max offer...  Let that sink in... 

 

 

 

Now if Batum has a better than his Avg..  Season he will be looking for the Max... 

NOTHING on this team is a gguarantee.. 

 

A VVonleh,  Turner  front court is very young and full of potential... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Kanter just got a max offer...  Let that sink in... 

 

 

 

Now if Batum has a better than his Avg..  Season he will be looking for the Max... 

 

NOTHING on this team is a gguarantee.. 

 

A VVonleh,  Turner  front court is very young and full of potential... 

Kanter got a max offer because Portland has cap space and figures "To heck with it, let's screw OKC here by putting them in a no-win situation given this is the last year on KD's contract."

If they don't match Kanter, they lose offense in the post. If they do, they have to give up their depth or go over the tax which they hate doing. No skin off Portland's nose. They're not going to the playoffs either way.

Where has "potential" ever gotten this franchise? What player with "potential" have we ever developed.

"Potential" made us pass on Kawhi Leonard and Klay Thompson to take Biz. Made us take Cody Zeller over Damian Lillard. And take Noah Vonleh who looks like he's at least three years away from being starter material, especially here.

To heck with "potential."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kind po

ter got a max offer because Portland has cap space and figures "To heck with it, let's screw OKC here by putting them in a no-win situation given this is the last year on KD's contract."

If they don't match Kanter, they lose offense in the post. If they do, they have to give up their depth or go over the tax which they hate doing. No skin off Portland's nose. They're not going to the playoffs either way.

Where has "potential" ever gotten this franchise? What player with "potential" have we ever developed.

"Potential" made us pass on Kawhi Leonard and Klay Thompson to take Biz. Made us take Cody Zeller over Damian Lillard. And take Noah Vonleh who looks like he's at least three years away from being starter material, especially here.

To heck with "potential."

if Batum  outperforms expectations..  He will want a Max deal whether you like it or not..  It's  crazy to think this team wouldn't have to overpay a player to stay here..  This is not a destination city get use to this knowledge..  

And potential is what made Anthony Davis a number 1 pick and a once in a decade talent...  Nobody knew he would be this good offensively  coming out of Kentucky... 

So you can pooh pooh potential picks but most of the best players in the league today..  Were not finished prospects and were drafted on potential... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • For starters, and again I am not sure what his capacity is in the media or how connected he is to the team, but I posted above Al Wallace says he is "absolutely" getting 50+ a year and he deserves it.  I obviously strongly disagree with it but it feels like like season when the team is slow leaking info to gauge the temp.   Secondly nobody on Gods green earth is going to sign an extension making less than he is making now.  Thats just crazy talk.  
    • No. Physical tools alone aren't enough. There are plenty of examples of draft busts to support that. Aost all of them had the physical tools and that wasn't enough. But Bryce is a perfect example of the opposite. Absolutely elite intangibles aren't enough either. If you simply don't have the physical abilities all the football intelligence and work ethic in the world won't be enough to overcome it. Just look to the sidelines every Sunday. We call those people "coaches".
    • As much as I despise Billy B, his philosophy on QBs is how I would approach things if I were a GM. You always keep looking for your next starter.  He has Bledsoe, who got injured and his backup ended up being the GOAT. Even while he had that going, he kept getting his next guy and developing them. When Brady got hurt, Cassel stepped in and went 11-5 and they missed the wild card by dumb luck. Who knows how far they would have gone if they had gotten in. Jimmy Gs career started in NE. There were others, but he always kept looking.  You can't be afraid to keep looking for your next starter, but it looks like we're afraid to look for more than a marginal one. If you're going to offer a $25m contract with incentives, that screams marginal QB. It also screams you're just a transition until we find our guy. After a 10 or 11 win season, he's not accepting that offer. And then you're in a Daniel Jones situation. Do you pay for a year of success and pray it wasn't a one year wonder?  To this point, Bryce has really produced nothing, yet for whatever reason, our FO has not even sniffed at the idea that we need a real QB room with real QBs. Dalton was never starter potential, Plummer was a joke. KP certainly isn't, neither is Grier.  Our approach to the QB room needs to be one of strength not fear. Bring in guys who can compete or who you think can compete. This is THE elite position, in an elite sport, paid premium salary, where production matters. Either you produce or you can lose your job. It's not mean, it's just the reality of the position.  And I'm really just tired of our candy ass approach to it. 
×
×
  • Create New...