Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Power Rankings - Panthers 14


KBRed

Recommended Posts

I really, really, really don't get the lovefest the media has with the Falcons. Their starters were totally abused in the preseason, and they have the worst defense in the South. And they're 8th?

On the flip side, how is New Orleans so low? They played great in the preseason and everyone knows how good their offense is. Even if they're the third best team in the South, they're still better than the 18th in the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really, really, really don't get the lovefest the media has with the Falcons. Their starters were totally abused in the preseason, and they have the worst defense in the South. And they're 8th?

On the flip side, how is New Orleans so low? They played great in the preseason and everyone knows how good their offense is. Even if they're the third best team in the South, they're still better than the 18th in the league.

B-b-b-b-but MATTY ICE OMFGGGGGGGG!!!!!!!!!!!

He's like the best, most dreamiest quarterback ever!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sando, the guru of the ranking, has a bias against the NFCS. He's the NFCW blogger and besides the Rams, everyone in that division is ranked a bit high. Chadiha is the only judge that has any love for the Panthers. Clayton is usally unbiased in his assessments. I have no idea what is with the other guy (with the crazy last name-- Khaharsky?) and his beef with the Panthers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • TBH, these are the kind of players that get weeded out of professional sports pretty quickly. Also, CMC is not that guy. There is zero indication that he isn't competitive. 
    • I like the free agency. It actually helps basically all schools across the board. Pretty much only ancient HC's and/or HC's that haven't been able to adjust have been complaining about the free agency. Your fortunes can be made or broken every offseason. It's not like before where a bad recruiting class or two meant multiyear purgatory.  I will never understand all the bellyaching about the NIL. If you want to talk about what ruined college athletics, it has been naked greed. Conference expansions for TV revenue, ever skyrocketing AD and facilities costs and now the attempts to permanently ruin the postseasons(football and basketball).  All the kids did was get a very well deserved piece of a very, very, VERY broken pie.
    • Nobody is saying they don't count against the cap, because yes, they technically do count against the cap as it's money the team is paying and it needs to be accounted for. But what you're not grasping it seems is that if a player gets $10 million guaranteed in their contract, whether they get literally $0 as a signing bonus or $8 million as a signing bonus, it doesn't change the overall cap hit of the contract, because cap hits are about the guaranteed money, not how much is paid up front. The only thing that how much is paid up front changes, is how the cap hit can be spread out amongst the years. So yes, technically there could end up being a slightly bigger cap hit in year 3 and 4 due to a bigger signing bonus, but if that is the case, it also means there will be a lesser cap hit in years 1 and 2 than there would have been with a smaller bonus.  But over the length of the contract, the size of the signing bonus has literally zero affect on the overall cap hit of the contract, because THAT part of it is 100% about the guaranteed money and nothing else.
×
×
  • Create New...