Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Return of the Chud


PntherPryd

Recommended Posts

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQpFMrqvg5tAkC26RGCZI8

No, this is not a Halloween Week re-run, it's really happening!

Last year the Colts did not want to lose Chud but did not want to replace their OC Hamilton.  So they gave him a new contract as "Associate" Head Coach and ignored/denied interview requests.  The theory was that they were worried about Hamilton getting a head coaching job and wanted Chud ready to go.

But now there are whispers that Chud is a leading candidate for the University of Miami job (which the colts can't block obviously) and the wheels could be turning.  When the Colts lose Monday night Irsay,  for his own ego's sake,  will can Pagano because it is Chud that he wants as the replacement and he does not want to risk losing him to a college job.

I have to be honest, I did not realize that Chud had landed here after the Browns fiasco.  And I don't know that I see his fingerprints on their offense.  But I'm sure there are some that still consider him a "genius".  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Irsay wants Chud? Where did you see that?

meh,  I made it up because I was bored.  No recent link.

But really just reading between the lines.  Why else give him a raise and the title of Associate Head Coach at the end of last season?  Not sure if it is Irsay or Grigson that is behind him but one of them is for sure

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he's smart he'll keep doing whatever it is he's doing with the Colts. It'll take a rare individual to turn around the Miami football program, with the lack of resources at that school, and I don't see Chud as that guy. He just doesn't have the personality for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why has Miami fallen off so bad why cant they do like they used to in recruiting

Their biggest booster is rotting in prison, no more love boat, cash, etc for recruiting. He also attempted to take the program down, just ask Vince Wilfork and Jon Beason who refused to talk to him or help him once his Ponzi scheme was discovered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

meh,  I made it up because I was bored.  No recent link.

But really just reading between the lines.  Why else give him a raise and the title of Associate Head Coach at the end of last season?  Not sure if it is Irsay or Grigson that is behind him but one of them is for sure

Eh, they just wanted him as a consultant. The title of asst head coach is meaningless.

I think Skipper carries that title with us. That doesn't mean he would be next in line behind Ron.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh, they just wanted him as a consultant. The title of asst head coach is meaningless.

I think Skipper carries that title with us. That doesn't mean he would be next in line behind Ron.

They named him "Associate" head coach, not assistant.  big difference in both status and $$$.  

Also helps prevent teams from sniffing around for an OC.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They named him "Associate" head coach, not assistant.  big difference in both status and $$$.  

Also helps prevent teams from sniffing around for an OC.

 

Obviously they wanted him on their staff.

Still think he has no chance to be their next HC. Interim, perhaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...