Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panther's statement game against Pack


mc52beast

Recommended Posts

We will find out how good the Panthers are this week against a very good Packers team. Some "experts " bring up the fact that we have played a group of qb's with a combined QBR that is horrible, that we have played teams with a combined record that is terrible...

We can finally silence the critics this Sunday by beating Rodgers and Co, there will be no " oh but look at who they beat. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RRC2 said:

Please fix the title. Panthers shouldn't have an apostrophe. It's not possessive.

Maybe what he's saying is that it's an individual Panthers player's statement game against the Pack, and that the statement game actually is a possession of said Panther?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every game from here on out will be a statement game.

The old ticker made it through last nights game. It was rough at times.

I just hope this Sunday's game is not as close.

With GB coming off a lost and us having a tough OT game and the weather, this game is going to be pretty interesting!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems to me winning in Seattle did a lot to increase the respect for the Panthers.  Obviously Seattle has not had a good season so far, but everyone knows how tough it is to go there and do what we did - IN THE WAY THAT WE DID IT.  4 80 yard TD drives.  That pretty much got people paying attention.

Winning aganst GB?!  I'm not sure I will know how to handle the change in narrative about the Panthers that could follow.  Being the best team in the NFC is totally new territory in my few years as a Panthers fan!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd hold on to Walker - we have no OT depth at all. Freeling is a block of clay - all the tools are there and he appears to have a great attitude. He needs serious work on his technique to realise his potential though.
    • From my watch last night: They weren't trading out of 19 unless it was a daft offer once Freeling got there. They were clearly antsy to get Hunter - and Minnesota actually called to offer the trade down. They weren't trading out of the third round pick once Brazzell fell to it (and Canales would have been happy with him in the second round). They traded back a lot on Day 3 - even if Morgan 'Babe Ruth'd' it with Lee, Hecht and Wheatley; they clearly weren't the only guys they would have taken at those picks. I'm curious to know which player caused the reaction at the start of day 2 (Dan Morgan): "of course they'd pick him"
    • Watching this confirms that this staff and front office is super high on Monroe Freeling. I wouldn't be surprised if he's gotta a real chance to win the starting LT job in camp. If he does, we can look to flip Rasheed Walker to a contender desperate for tackle help.   As for Ickey I still really like him and wanna extend him but based on how the staff was talking about Freeling it might be time for ickey to start taking some practice sets at guard if he wants to stay here as we are gonna have to have figure out a solution for the contracts of Lewis and Hunt.  My preferred scenario for the Oline in 2027 is Freeling-Ickey-Hech-Lewis-Moton. 
×
×
  • Create New...