Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Official Poll - Should Jake Start Against Atlanta...


Zod

Recommended Posts

Yes because as much as he can stink up a game, he can easily throw for 3 TD's and 300yds on the next. For now he gives us our best option to win. If the playoffs become out of reach then we can audition Moore to see if he is our future QB but as of now I am on the sink or swim boat with Delhomme.

I am seriously doubting that there are any multiple TD, 300+ yard performances in the tank. People are going to say that moving to Matt Moore is giving up the season but staying with Jake is leading nowhere anyway. It's not going to be too many more of those performances until the team starts to steadily slide into a funk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes because as much as he can stink up a game, he can easily throw for 3 TD's and 300yds on the next. For now he gives us our best option to win. If the playoffs become out of reach then we can audition Moore to see if he is our future QB but as of now I am on the sink or swim boat with Delhomme.

/thread

We have to play the hand we have been dealt.

Bad thing for the Coaching staff? They are the dealer as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know I don't post here very much but I do read every day. I am sorry but I have to make my voice heard on this. Jake is done. How many times did Steve Smith save his ass last season? Luck alway's runs out and he is well out of luck. Trading for a quarterback after the season has begun is always a bad idea since they have a whole new offense to learn. The only possibility would be Derek Anderson since he has already played in a Davidson offense. But let's face it, I'm no Matt Moore fan, but he gives the team the best chance to win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...