Hawks Fans are mad RW isn't MVP

[DabDeezNuts224]

1 minute ago, KillerKat said:

I finally found a chart about drops. We are 7th in the league in dropped passes. Seattle is 31st. 

http://www.sportingcharts.com/nfl/stats/team-receiver-drops-percentage/2015/

Suck on that Seattle fans.

Sweet google score. I was talking about Ginn's drops.Relax

[KillerKat]

Just now, DabDeezNuts224 said:

Sweet google score. I was talking about Ginn's drops.Relax

I was addressing the OP first and then agreeing with you in the second post.

[LA_Panther]

2 minutes ago, DabDeezNuts224 said:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKRnEOUxZm0  "Clever girl"  Oh yes, an Inbred from Georgia, because this where the Army decided to send me after 9 years definitely makes me not from Seattle . So much unneeded hostility. Calm down cupcake, you're not doing yourself any favors .

See my last post. 

[CRA]

Russell Wilson is a damn good QB.  He does certain things better than Cam.

If you disregard their teams around them.....

Cam simply can do more overall and presents more issues.  All that is simply bc Cam has a Julius Peppers body to play QB with.  Means he presents a mismatch no one has ever dealt with....and Cam makes the most of it bc he elects to be a pure football player and not a traditional QB.   It likely will cost him one day bc he elects to be a power RB that legitimately does care about contact. 

Both are very different.  Not sure why we can't let different be different.  Cam deserves the MVP and Russell deserves recognition for taking a step forward and finally showing he can be elite and out of a Lynch oriented O where he makes plays off it

[TheRed]

9 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

I finally found a chart about drops. We are 7th in the league in dropped passes. Seattle is 31st. 

http://www.sportingcharts.com/nfl/stats/team-receiver-drops-percentage/2015/

Suck on that Seattle fans.

Different sites differ on what they actually consider "drops". I think 7th is being kind.

[KillerKat]

Just now, CRA said:

Russell Wilson is a damn good QB.  He does certain things better than Cam.

If you disregard their teams around them.....

Cam simply can do more overall and presents more issues.  All that is simply bc Cam has a Julius Peppers body to play QB with.  Means he presents a mismatch no one has ever dealt with....and Cam makes the most of it bc he elects to be a pure football player and not a traditional QB.   It likely will cost him one day bc he elects to be a power RB that legitimately does care about contact. 

Both are very different.  Not sure why we can't let different be different.  Cam deserves the MVP and Russell deserves recognition for taking a step forward and finally showing he can be elite and out of a Lynch oriented O where he makes plays off it

Wilson's receivers are also way better than ours overall. 

[KillerKat]

Just now, TheRed said:

Different sites differ on what they actually consider "drops". I think 7th is being kind.

Yeah probably so. Still shows the large discrepancy between our receivers and theirs.

[CRA]

1 minute ago, KillerKat said:

Wilson's receivers are also way better than ours overall. 

I agree.  Carolina has the weakest WRs in the postseason and it isn't a debate 

[CPcavedweller]

32 minutes ago, DabDeezNuts224 said:

there is no insecurity, but the lack of fact checking on some of the members here on this board is laughable, especially about Russell's pocket passing 

Most are new people much like yourself. They come off of the comments sections and bring their poo logic here and run the place until we begin to lose, then the posters who don't have a jersey from a second team hanging in the back of their closet stick around and civility ensues. 

In regards to the topic at hand, if it weren't for Cam having the year he has had I would have no qualms about Wilson winning the MVP. 

[CPcavedweller]

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

I agree.  Carolina has the weakest WRs in the postseason and it isn't a debate 

Green Bay? At least we have speed and a savvy veteran who knows the nuances of his position. Green Bay has none of that. 

[LA_Panther]

2 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

Green Bay? At least we have speed and a savvy veteran who knows the nuances of his position. Green Bay has none of that. 

I think GB is done. They are out of gas. Lucky a$$ redskins will get to play in the div round

[CPcavedweller]

Just now, LA_Panther said:

I think GB is done. They are out of gas. Lucky a$$ redskins will get to play in the div round

I have Washington winning that game simply because of the weather and Green Bay's lack of a wide receiver outside of Cobb and no tight end to speak of. 

[CRA]

40 minutes ago, DabDeezNuts224 said:

there is no insecurity, but the lack of fact checking on some of the members here on this board is laughable, especially about Russell's pocket passing 

Wilson, historically, his play from the pocket has been questioned as a weak part of his game most of his great career. 

in fairness, he has displayed a new found skill for a recent 7 game or so stretch....so everyone isn't going to recognize it right away.  

I also think he will come down to Earth some soon....it was such a big change for him and your scheme.  Now NFL teams will soon have more and more tape to gameplan for the changes which always brings crazy stuff down some. 

But he has been great of late in ways teams aren't use to seeing. Carolina for example can probably throw out the Seattle offensive film from the first matchup.   Gameplanning for that would be pointless.  

[CPcavedweller]

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

Wilson, historically, his play from the pocket has been questioned as a weak part of his game most of his great career. 

in fairness, he has displayed a new found skill for a recent 7 game or so stretch....so everyone isn't going to recognize it right away.  

I also think he will come down to Earth some soon....it was such a big change for him and your scheme.  Now NFL teams will soon have more and more tape to gameplan for the changes which always brings crazy stuff down some. 

But he has been great of late in ways teams aren't use to seeing. Carolina for example can probably throw out the Seattle offensive film from the first matchup.   Gameplanning for that would be pointless.  

You are speaking the same way about Wilson as people speak of stopping our offense. "Bracket Olsen, spy Cam". "Once more tape becomes available the read option won't work and Cam will begin to faulter". 

I don't mean to create a stir, but your post is quite generic.