Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

12th Man


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, SeahawksChamps2016 said:

Kind of like you beat us with a botched coverage? Oh wait i forgot panthers are the best team ever no way that can be true.

We beat you from a mistake you made? Or by a throw from our MVP quarterback to our pro bowl tight end. 

You should be trying to get your playoff tickets back you were prolly selling by halftime like half your 12s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, SeahawksChamps2016 said:

Well we also have a MVP level quarter back . (not saying he should get MVP).  And also have alot of pro bowlers on defense. Its really an even matchup.

Cam = 40 all pro votes

Wilson = 1 all pro vote 

your boy isn't even a blip on the radar

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SeahawksChamps2016 said:

Kind of like you beat us with a botched coverage? Oh wait i forgot panthers are the best team ever no way that can be true.

Are you comparing a QB making a perfect read and throw into busted coverage for the win and a kicker missing a literal chip shot field goal?

Thats fuging retarded. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...