Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ted Ginn an X-Factor?


cpipster49

Recommended Posts

We can't overlook the fact that Ted Ginn was an Arizona Cardinal last year. He didn't see much time on the feel or have many passes thrown his way, but he was in the film room with the three-headed beast our secondary is tasked with stopping on Sunday.

Another note about Ginn: He was targeted just once against the Seahawks and his only yards were 11 rushing yards on an end around. We jumped out to such a big lead early we never had to run plays that take advantage of Ginn's speed. We know he is healthy or else Philly Brown or Brenton Bersin would have been returning our punts.

Since we know the Cardinals coaches don't think much of him to begin with, combined with the fact that he won't show up much in the game film from Sunday, he may not be a point of emphasis and a place we can attack the Cardinals if their secondary doesn't play him they way he needs to be played. But he still needs to catch the ball!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, cpipster49 said:

We can't overlook the fact that Ted Ginn was an Arizona Cardinal last year. He didn't see much time on the feel or have many passes thrown his way, but he was in the film room with the three-headed beast our secondary is tasked with stopping on Sunday.

Another note about Ginn: He was targeted just once against the Seahawks and his only yards were 11 rushing yards on an end around. We jumped out to such a big lead early we never had to run plays that take advantage of Ginn's speed. We know he is healthy or else Philly Brown or Brenton Bersin would have been returning our punts.

Since we know the Cardinals coaches don't think much of him to begin with, combined with the fact that he won't show up much in the game film from Sunday, he may not be a point of emphasis and a place we can attack the Cardinals if their secondary doesn't play him they way he needs to be played. But he still needs to catch the ball!

Based off the Seattle game, Cardinals may be more prepared for the run.

Though we bitched and moaned. It's true. The Panthers really didn't show much of their passing attack Sunday, and this may/should bode well for them, especially playing at home and with Ginn maybe wanting to prove something?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, FootballMaestro said:

Based off the Seattle game, Cardinals may be more prepared for the run.

Though we bitched and moaned. It's true. The Panthers really didn't show much of their passing attack Sunday, and this may/should bode well for them, especially playing at home and with Ginn maybe wanting to prove something?

I think the coaches were scared. Cam's not stupid but he's got plenty of gun slinger passes each game. Doing that against Sherman and Thomas is playing with fire. I think they wanted to avoid a pick at all costs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Donald LaFell said:

I think the coaches were scared. Cam's not stupid but he's got plenty of gun slinger passes each game. Doing that against Sherman and Thomas is playing with fire. I think they wanted to avoid a pick at all costs. 

Especially with a big lead!

Obviously, the Panthers did the opposite when down in Seattle earlier in the season.

Should be an interesting game.

Hopefully (another, or complete) Panther blow out!?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Jonathan Stewart is the X-Factor.  I hope he pounds the ball 20+ times on Sunday.  The Packers ran pretty 'easily' against the Cardinals which is surprising because the Packers don't have a great running game.  

I think the Panthers need to run, and run, and run more to win this game.  This will take time off the clock & keep the ball out of Palmer's hands.....we don't need him to have lots of time to throw to Fitzgerald, Brown, and Floyd as those guys present some match-up problems for our injured secondary.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...