Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Underrated games thread


The Faceless

Recommended Posts

As one of my first contributions to the Huddle, I am starting a thread about under appreciated games. One that comes to mind is a PS2 game called Shin Megami Tensei:Nocturne. It's from the makers of the now popular Persona series. It's set in post apocalyptic Tokyo and is an RPG with a twist. It's somewhat demonic and has a cool fighting system where if you hit your enemys weakness, you can gain extra turns but it works the other way as well.

You can also recruit demons to fight along side you and can also fuse them to make even deadlier allies, allowing for tons of customization. It is a pretty rare game though and the price can get kind of high, but this game is well worth the investment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

infininte undiscovery was the worst game square has ever put out. lost oddesey was so terrible that i quit playing it halfway through. just my opinion though. there has not been a good RPG for the xbox 360 yet.

Blue Dragon was pretty fun, it just got boring after a while, but the cutscenes and stuff were sweet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

infininte undiscovery was the worst game square has ever put out. lost oddesey was so terrible that i quit playing it halfway through. just my opinion though. there has not been a good RPG for the xbox 360 yet.

Have you actually played IU?

hmmm

:nono:

Lost Oddesey is great also.

Good thing its just you opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Malcom Spence is the best player remaining, hope he’s there.
    • The era that you played in, and, more importantly, who you played with actually matters. Honestly, that's why these issues will be debated forever, as it's just difficult to say that this person or that person is better when you're discussing the passage of time. As for me, after Rice, Moss and maybe Megatron and T.O., there's probably a dozen or so guys that can be argued about to the cows come home. Personally, I'm not putting Fitz, Harrison, Johnson, Evans, or especially D-Hop, Jefferson, Chase or Hill definitely in front of Smitty (and Colston ain't even in the discussion). Context and all that stuff actually matters. Things like the triple crown matter. 
    • Some of those guys? Yeah honestly you can.  I would 100% take Steve Smith over Larry Fitzgerald, Harrison, even Mike Evans. He is 100% a better player than those guys in his prime. If you look at the numbers Smith is historically under targeted in comparison to his contemporaries. He was only targeted 150 times or more only once in his career. Fitzgerald for example was targeted well above that 9 different seasons. Had Smith played with Peyton, Brady, Greatest Show on Turf, or even with Warner in Arizona he would broken records. His 2008 season was ridiculous accumulating 1400 yards in 13 games on less than 80 receptions. All time he also lost a season due to injury in 04, barely played WR as a rookie. Got robbed of 1k season with Clausen. Thats easily another 1800yds minimum that should have been tacked on to his #s. The only guys I’d say for certain are better than Smith are Rice, Moss, TO, Megatron, Julio Jones, Antonio Brown.
×
×
  • Create New...