Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Blandino on the no catch call


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, Castavar said:

It was no doubt a bullsh*t call, but it all could have been avoided if Crotchery just made a clean catch. Not to mention his later drop on the 4. Dude crumbled big time for a "veteran" player.

I seem to recall now that during training camp folks who were wanting to see him gone kept bringing up a bad drop of his.  Was it in the playoffs against Seattle last year?  I'm not sure.  Those of us ok with keeping him kept saying, it was his ONLY drop the whole year....

I'm not familiar with Cotch's pre-Panther days.  I'm beginning to wonder if he's got a pattern of drops in key games?  Certainly he was a great pair of hands for us in the regular season.  "Clutchery" .. that's why his drops on Sunday were so damning and surprising.   (The whole game Sunday was just weird really.  At least on offense it was like "pretend Panthers" on the field.  So different from what we saw all season.... I'm beginning to understand SOME of the "whys" but still.. )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PS: Good Observer article with Cotchery's comments on the game.  I admit he's willing to own up to his mistakes and recognizes how they killed momentum. 

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/sports/nfl/carolina-panthers/article59083888.html

Quote

 

“The hard part is when you’ve got opportunities to make a play you have to make it, whether it’s Jerricho or any of the other players out there,” Rivera said. “You get a chance to make a play you make it, and it helps keep the momentum going, convert first downs, stuff like that. Those things hurt.”

Cotchery wasn’t alone in making mistakes Sunday for the Panthers. But his were so uncharacteristic they stood out among others.

“When you have those self inflicted wounds, it just takes away all momentum,” Cotchery said. “That seemed to be the theme tonight.”

 


Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/sports/nfl/carolina-panthers/article59083888.html#storylink=cpy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trying to find what I'm remembering of a bad Cotchery play last year in the post-season:

Seems there was a mix up between Cam & Cotch in the wild card against AZ which led to an interception

http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2015/1/3/7487243/panthers-cardinals-2015-results-score-nfl-playoffs-cam-newton-ryan-lindley

Quote

Despite the offensive ineptitude, the Cardinals actually carried a 14-13 lead into halftime. A litany of Panther mistakes kept Arizona in the game, including a muffed punt, a badly missed field goal, and miscommunication between Cam Newton and Jerricho Cotchery that led to a pick.

 

And here's a Pro Football Talk article about the playoff loss in Seattle:

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/01/10/seahawks-advance-to-nfc-title-game-with-31-17-win/

A commenter mentions "crtical drops" by Olsen, Cotchery & Tolbert.  Yuck... sounds familiar. 

I think it was the only drop credited to Cotchery all last season.  Just like this season he'd had 0 drops before Sunday.

I guess he is NOT "Mr. January" or "Mr February"

Sigh.   He was clutch so much in the regular season.  This really has to hurt....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, KB_fan said:

I seem to recall now that during training camp folks who were wanting to see him gone kept bringing up a bad drop of his.  Was it in the playoffs against Seattle last year?  I'm not sure.  Those of us ok with keeping him kept saying, it was his ONLY drop the whole year....

I'm not familiar with Cotch's pre-Panther days.  I'm beginning to wonder if he's got a pattern of drops in key games?  Certainly he was a great pair of hands for us in the regular season.  "Clutchery" .. that's why his drops on Sunday were so damning and surprising.   (The whole game Sunday was just weird really.  At least on offense it was like "pretend Panthers" on the field.  So different from what we saw all season.... I'm beginning to understand SOME of the "whys" but still.. )

You're thinking of the dropped TD in Cincy - Jones was right there, but a seemingly catchable ball. Would have been a game-winner.

bandicam_2014-10-13_11-22-25-560.0.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, KSpan said:

You're thinking of the dropped TD in Cincy - Jones was right there, but a seemingly catchable ball. Would have been a game-winner.

 

Ah yes, thanks.  That probably is what I'm thinking of.   I did quickly scan the Seattle Jan 2015 playoff film and Cotchery had a two incompletions that looked catchable..., in addition to a play where a Seattle defender got in front of him and nearly intercepted it.... but I didn't see a flagrant drop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, BANE said:

No s**t jackass, that's not the f'ing point. The refs need to do their jobs correctly, which they failed to do miserably on the play in question. There has got to be harsher penalties for refs missing calls like this.

It may have not been your point, but it's mine.  Replace the word "refs" with "wr" in your sentence and maybe it's simple enough for you to understand... it's the same thing.  Different toilet, same s**t.  Am I the only one who noticed that Cotchery played horribly?  Or do you want to blame the refs for that too?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When Mike Carey, a former respected official says it's a catch and 30 seconds later the actual game ref comes on TV and says it isn't a catch should tell everyone in the world that nobody really knows what constitutes a catch in the NFL anymore.  The NFL can now have it both ways and always be "right" in making whatever call they want to make in any given circumstances.   The inconsistencies is what make me sick.  If they called it a no catch in the Indianapolis and Pittsburgh game, I could live with it being a no catch for Cotchery but when they allow those catches to stand and overturn ours is simply ridiculous.  

Also, how the hell can Manning be so clearly touched on the Ealy sack and we are forced to burn our last challenge to get the call corrected?  It's funny, Denver didn't have to use any challenges at all because they had nothing in question on their side.  

Cam was getting blasted and taken to the ground after he threw the ball and it wasn't called all game but I'm sure old man manning wouldn't have been allowed to be driven into the ground like that.

Boston swats a ball out of Sanders hand and draws an unsportsmanlike penalty but Julius Peppers  swipes a ball out of Cam's hand and plays keep away and no call is made.  Turner shoves a guy at the whistles and gets a personal foul but we've seen those plays and much worse happen all year and it wasn't called.  The inconsistencies are eating away at me and it's going to be a long, long offseason.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

100% agree with you @cgarsmoker that the glaring inconsistencies are the main issue.  Get it right, get it wrong, but do it the same for everyone... this catch rule thing is literally ruining the league mainly because I've seen the EXACT same play be called differently by the EXACT same officials with help from New York.

 

I will say however that Mike Carey is an idiot and I knew as soon as he said it would be overturned that we were doomed.

 

On the Manning down challenge, in a perfect world they'd get that call right, but I personally cut them a little slack on those bang-bang plays like that... their view may have been obscured, etc.  I saw a pretty blatant hold by Remmers on Miller that they didn't call also, so plays are plays... but as I've said a million and one times, the ones that burn my buttocks are the ones they review and STILL get wrong.  No excuse for that, period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...