Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

"Desert Trip" Concert: October Coachella


Anybodyhome

Recommended Posts

3 nights, 6 bands, October 7-9 in Indio, CA.

Two bands will play each night and do a full set each. Not the usual festival with several different stages and music all day and night, this is a single stage event.

First night: Rolling Stones & Bob Dylan

Second night: Paul McCartney & Neil Young

Third night: Roger Waters & The Who

$399 3-day general admission all the way to $1500 reserved seating.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wife was going to surprise me with tickets, but we're in the middle of dropping some serious cash into a kitchen reno and spending a few thou on a frivolous trip like that would not be fun for me. Besides, I've seen 5 of the 6 acts who will be performing.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, 15 said:

I went to coachella this year already which is one of the main reasons I won't go. Will be sick though and the weather will be nice.

I think Golden Voice chose to do this as a way to phase classic rock headlining acts out. Every year they bring a big name classic rock act to headline and they end up getting way less of a crowd than any DJ or pop act.

Who was it this year? I don't recall any "classic rock" bands on this year's lineup. GnR is certainly not considered a classic rock band if that's who you were referring to. 

And they're doing it because the demographic for Desert Trip is 2 generations removed from those who attend Coachella and they will make as much from ticket sales for these 6 bands as they did for the 50 or so at the Coach.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, 15 said:

Guns and roses is a classic rock band, turn on any classic rock station - you'll here guns and roses. 

Coachella tries to bring in classic rock bands to headline recently but fail to get as many viewers as any of the DJ headliners, which is why you're starting to see DJ's and rappers headline.

this will definitely make GV a lot of money, but definitely not as much as coachella. People literally go to coachella just to go to coachella, and it covers almost every age group. Popular music > old popular music.

I don't listen to terrestrial radio. And by almost any definition of classic rock you'll see the genre is pre-1980-85

GnR didn't even sign their Geffen record deal until 1986. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 15 said:

You can call them whatever genre you want, but when GV books ACDC and GNR back to back years and their crowds are outnumbered by DJ's and rappers, you get this "Old-chella".

Paul Tollett: "Damn we gotta stop booking these old bands during coachella, just look at the numbers! Okay, I got it. Lets just make a giant ass festival with the 6 bands we were going to use eventually for headlining acts and charge the same price. Brilliant!"

It's amusing when someone with a point of reference somewhere in the 90's tries to explain history to someone who lived it. 

To each his own. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, 15 said:

Guns and roses is a classic rock band, turn on any classic rock station - you'll here guns and roses. 

Coachella tries to bring in classic rock bands to headline recently but fail to get as many viewers as any of the DJ headliners, which is why you're starting to see DJ's and rappers headline.

this will definitely make GV a lot of money, but definitely not as much as coachella. People literally go to coachella just to go to coachella, and it covers almost every age group. Popular music > old popular music.

When a song is over 5 mins some people fall apart to look into their phone for  the 80k time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No. Physical tools alone aren't enough. There are plenty of examples of draft busts to support that. Aost all of them had the physical tools and that wasn't enough. But Bryce is a perfect example of the opposite. Absolutely elite intangibles aren't enough either. If you simply don't have the physical abilities all the football intelligence and work ethic in the world won't be enough to overcome it. Just look to the sidelines every Sunday. We call those people "coaches".
    • As much as I despise Billy B, his philosophy on QBs is how I would approach things if I were a GM. You always keep looking for your next starter.  He has Bledsoe, who got injured and his backup ended up being the GOAT. Even while he had that going, he kept getting his next guy and developing them. When Brady got hurt, Cassel stepped in and went 11-5 and they missed the wild card by dumb luck. Who knows how far they would have gone if they had gotten in. Jimmy Gs career started in NE. There were others, but he always kept looking.  You can't be afraid to keep looking for your next starter, but it looks like we're afraid to look for more than a marginal one. If you're going to offer a $25m contract with incentives, that screams marginal QB. It also screams you're just a transition until we find our guy. After a 10 or 11 win season, he's not accepting that offer. And then you're in a Daniel Jones situation. Do you pay for a year of success and pray it wasn't a one year wonder?  To this point, Bryce has really produced nothing, yet for whatever reason, our FO has not even sniffed at the idea that we need a real QB room with real QBs. Dalton was never starter potential, Plummer was a joke. KP certainly isn't, neither is Grier.  Our approach to the QB room needs to be one of strength not fear. Bring in guys who can compete or who you think can compete. This is THE elite position, in an elite sport, paid premium salary, where production matters. Either you produce or you can lose your job. It's not mean, it's just the reality of the position.  And I'm really just tired of our candy ass approach to it. 
    • If you plug Bryce onto the Pro Bowl roster you might have a chance to compete for a SB. If he's surrounded by top tier talent with a top tier defense on the other side, a field flipping punter, and a kicker good from 60+ you might have a chance. But that means you basically have to recreate Saban's Bama in the NFL and that's impossible... and Bryce couldn't win a championship in that environment either. What the Panthers didn't realize when they got so obsessed with his "PG mentality" was that what they were looking st was a "barely checks the box PG". The basketball equivalent of Bryce would be an undersized PG with marginal athleticism who can make the basic plays but adds nothing to the team in terms of elevating the overall team. Not a great shooter, not a great defender, not a great driver. Just a guy who can basically get you into the offense and be a matador on defense. Basically a placeholder while you look to upgrade the PG position. 
×
×
  • Create New...