Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Damn people!!!


merchman567

Recommended Posts

All I hear is our coaching sucks.. our coaching sucks. Look our running game and offensive line looked like garbage last week... and this week it looked good... dominant at times... all I heard this week was how abrams was going to eat us up... didnt happen. THATS COACHING!!! Now our defense and special teams sucked.. so now lets see them fix that... I mean you would think today was do or die... its fn week 2! If our d still looks like trash and special teams... then yes coaching is to blame, but all I hear is I want good coaching I want good coaching... guess what.. were about to see what kind of coaching staff we have.... let it play out! Also that pick.. I watched it again.. steve smith should have came toward the ball more so the dback couldnt intercept... I say the blame is 50/50 on that one!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whos aplogizing... Im just saying you cant measure a season by 2 games... and call me what you want but the facts are the facts... the offense doesnt get better because they switch what kind of toilet paper they use... they get better because of coaching. So lets see if the D gets better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not being a Fox apologist, it's being a realist. That is a good point that merchman made, and it's true. Those were the complaints last week, and this week it was markedly improved.

Already wanting to fire Meeks 2 weeks in is idiotic to say the very, very least.

Do you know that there are 14 games left in the season? And if the last 2 games are the worst we play, then we're doing all right. At least we've shown improvement, and that's what is important. We were in this game for the most part. Some of you really need to get your sh*t together and FAST.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I hear is our coaching sucks.. our coaching sucks. Look our running game and offensive line looked like garbage last week... and this week it looked good... dominant at times... all I heard this week was how abrams was going to eat us up... didnt happen. THATS COACHING!!! Now our defense and special teams sucked.. so now lets see them fix that... I mean you would think today was do or die... its fn week 2! If our d still looks like trash and special teams... then yes coaching is to blame, but all I hear is I want good coaching I want good coaching... guess what.. were about to see what kind of coaching staff we have.... let it play out! Also that pick.. I watched it again.. steve smith should have came toward the ball more so the dback couldnt intercept... I say the blame is 50/50 on that one!

Fox IS the keeping the team down to some degree. He his part in the last 3 losses his been ignored nationally. Each week there is a glaring flaw in the coaching.....today we saw the same thing we saw all of last season. What he wants to do on defense won't work with this roster.

that INT imo is 70% on Smitty b/c he simpy got outplayed to the ball......I would ask/expect Jake to make that throw every time in that situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you're abit nuts there... Smitty was open, and Jake missed the timing on the throw. He threw it late, which allowed the defender to make a play for the ball. If Jake had not hesitated, that would have been a TD for sure.

The coaches did adjust for the OLine woes this week, which I was happy to see, but overall still lacked in their defensive game planning, play selection, and don't even get me started on the special teams. :rant:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice Rah-Rah speech! The bottom line is we're 0-2 and it ain't getting any easier. Most of us are tired of watching this boring style of football. Its old and we need a change. The good thing about all of this is the more losese we have the closer Fox and his whole damn staff are to being the hell out of here. Sorry, this poo has ran its course. Time for a new direction which should include a whole new mindset and attitude. We are soft, period!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not being a Fox apologist, it's being a realist. That is a good point that merchman made, and it's true. Those were the complaints last week, and this week it was markedly improved.

Already wanting to fire Meeks 2 weeks in is idiotic to say the very, very least.

Do you know that there are 14 games left in the season? And if the last 2 games are the worst we play, then we're doing all right. At least we've shown improvement, and that's what is important. We were in this game for the most part. Some of you really need to get your sh*t together and FAST.

offensively compared to last week is what you call improvement, the same old bend but don't break, rush four play 10 yards off defense is not improvement it's been the same for the past 2 years. fox haters actually have a point and evidence to actually claim why fox is hurting this team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand the point of those who say it's only game two of a long season, and I also readily acknowledge that today's performance was head and shoulders above that abortion we played last week. And believe me, I'm one of those that you all would probably call a homer (even though Jake stunk it up last week, I still think he can lead this team to a championship, and what happened last week wasn't entirely his fault - there's plenty of blame to go around). I probably tend to look on the sunny side much more than the situation probably warrants. Still, having said all of that, I can't shake the disquieting feeling in my gut that something's just not clicking, and that makes me think this could very easily turn into another of those long seasons that make my hair turn a little bit grayer and my wife say I'm unfit company.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That is just Panthers history pain speaking.
    • From what I gather, sure it allows you more room in that you can manipulate the cap more due to smaller prorated amounts to fit salaries in, but for cap purposes, you're still on the hook for the money at the end of the day.    "ChatGPT You said: What are the advantages for NFL teams to sign larger signing bonuses? ChatGPT said: NFL teams often use large signing bonuses as a strategic tool in contracts. While they cost real cash up front, they offer several advantages, especially when it comes to salary cap management, player retention, and negotiation leverage. Here's a breakdown of the benefits: ✅ 1. Salary Cap Flexibility Signing bonuses are prorated over the life of the contract (up to 5 years) for salary cap purposes. This allows teams to spread out the cap hit, even if the player receives the money immediately. Example: A $20M signing bonus on a 4-year deal counts only $5M/year against the cap. ✅ 2. Attracting Top Talent Players love signing bonuses because they're guaranteed money paid up front. Offering a bigger signing bonus can sweeten the deal without inflating yearly salaries. ✅ 3. Front-Loading Real Cash, Not Cap Teams with strong cash flow can pay big bonuses now while minimizing the immediate cap hit. Useful for teams trying to build around rookie QB contracts or with flexible cash budgets. ✅ 4. Locking in Key Players Larger bonuses make it harder for a player to be released early due to dead cap consequences. This can create more job security for the player and roster continuity for the team. ✅ 5. Leverage in Restructures Big signing bonuses create future cap hits via proration. Teams can later restructure deals (e.g., convert salary to bonus) to create even more cap space. ✅ 6. Competitive Edge In free agency, a team offering more guaranteed cash up front often wins the bidding war, even if the total contract value is lower than another team's. ⚠️ Key Caveat: Large signing bonuses increase dead cap risk if the player is cut or traded early."   I think that roster bonuses can be a useful tool if you're trying to keep players in by manipulating numbers and spreading the hit over time, but I don't think that it's something that you want to use unless it's "necessary." I don't know that you want to get into signing rookies on roster bonuses, as the bust rate is relatively high.    
    • not even if that team in New Orleans disbands before the first game.  Saw one 2026 mock that had them drafting first next year.  
×
×
  • Create New...