Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Strength of Schedule based on SB odds


Recommended Posts

Saw a very interesting post that referenced teams strength of schedule based on their opponents superbowl odds. Instead of calculating strength of schedule based on a teams 2015 record, this site calculated SOS based on current vegas odds, assigning the teams a number 1-32 and averaging the total for each team.  While not a perfect measure, it was interesting how this stacked up:   With 1 being the toughest SOS. http://nfltraderumors.co/2016-nfl-strength-schedule/

Rank

Team

Avg. Opp. SB Odds

SB Odds

1. Redskins 12.25 4000
2. Eagles 12.69 5000
3. Browns 13.69 10000
4. Jets 14.06 5000
4. Ravens 14.06 3300
6. 49ers 14.31 10000
6. Vikings 14.31 2000
8. Texans 14.44 3300
9. Bills 14.50 5000
10. Bengals 14.63 1800
11. Buccaneers 14.75 10000
11. Lions 14.75 6600
13. Steelers 15.13 1,000
14. Dolphins 15.25 6600
15. Giants 15.31 2500
16. Rams 15.56 6600
16. Titans 15.56 7500
18. Jaguars 15.63 5000
18. Broncos 15.63 1800
18. Packers 15.63 1000
21. Colts 15.75 2500
22. Falcons 15.88 5000
23. Chiefs 15.94 2500
24. Saints 16.00 6600
25. Patriots 16.19 700
26. Bears 16.25 5000
27. Cowboys 16.31 2000
28. Chargers 16.38 6600
29. Raiders 16.69 2500
30. Cardinals 17.25 1200
31. Seahawks 17.44 800
32. Panthers 17.81 1100
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, I'm starved for contention. If you can't see that and keep wanting to turn things like this back around on T-Mac, then you're just either being purposefully obtuse, or is a fan who is happy having 5-6 win seasons just because we're so used to the 3-4 win seasons and you like "just being better"
    • Chiefs had zero penalties last night
    • You mean the guy who took over a franchise that hadn't had a losing season in the previous 4 seasons... who proceeded to get his team into the playoffs in 3 of his first 4 seasons, only to win 2 games in said playoffs, to then go on to having a 54-74 career record and never won another playoff game after those first two? Who then after being fired from that job, took over a team that was 30-18 in the 3 seasons before he got the job, got into the playoffs that first season, lost their first postseasons game, and then went on to have a 6-26 record over the next 2 seasons? You're literally proving my point by bringing up someone who's claim to fame is that quote. If you just play to win the game, you're never going to be a successful franchise.  You need to play to win the game while ALSO working to make your players better.  Having the former without the latter is a picture perfect recipe to become a stagnant franchise. That's how you work towards being a winning franchise who can contend in the postseason.  And sure, having a stagnant franchise that makes the playoffs every other season is better than what we currently are, but that's not what I strive for with our Panthers, I want to actually contend for championships in my lifetime.
×
×
  • Create New...