Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

if Fox gets fired...


PhillyB

Recommended Posts

He could be a D coordinator.....Ron Meeks has been employed for years.....he really doesn't bring much. If a HC wants to run a fairly safe and conservative D...Fox wouldn't be a bad guy as a DC. I don't see him jumping right into another HC gig right away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fox would be a head coach on another team moments after we fire him. That's if he's fired and I don't see that happening.

Can't think of one team in the NFL who would want Vanilla Fox (Bengals POSSIBLY), if they do then they are absolutely idiots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fox would be a head coach on another team moments after we fire him. That's if he's fired and I don't see that happening.

I hear this from the media so often whenever they mention Fox being fired and I just don't see the logic.

NFL Executive: "Quick Fox just got fired! We could use a soft approach towards the game of football with an extra touch of ineffectiveness! Get his ass down here now!!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fox would be a head coach on another team moments after we fire him. That's if he's fired and I don't see that happening.

Nah, you gotta look at how many opening there will most likely be....and how many would want to go conservative. If they want to go conservative Fox will find a job but it is pretty much known league wide that Fox is the easiest coach to gameplan for when he comes up on the schedule. The league has changed......coaches with Fox's mindset are no longer the norm. Fox has very good stats....and stats mean nothing per Fox. If you evauate what he does and doesn't do.....it isn't very impressive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't think of one team in the NFL who would want Vanilla Fox (Bengals POSSIBLY), if they do then they are absolutely idiots.

Me neither. I haven't heard of any coaches on the hot seat recently, but maybe one of the bottom teams in the league might take a chance on him. Like someone else said, I see him having more opportunities getting a DC job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • First, apologies @MHS831, I know you began this about tackles, and it was good. But... Frank, your post is just another Bryce sucks post. You obviously believe, like your buddy, that if we draft a WR it's all about evaluating Bryce Young or coddling Bryce Young. In short, it would be about improving the damned team. If anything, if Bryce is as destined to fail (or is already a failure right now... irredeemable), then another playmaker at WR would just seal the envelope and send him on his way. In my world, that's a good thing.  If some of you think that Bryce is a lame duck, then why wouldn't you want to set the offense up for the next QB to come in and be dropped into the offense to have success? Or, maybe you think it's all a moot point anyway because Tepper sucks, Dan Morgan sucks, Canales sucks, Ejiro sucks, Brandt Tilis sucks---everybidy sucks! If that's the case, then why does anyone care who or what we draft? Obviously some of you have all the answers and can run a gotdamn franchise better than the FO does now.
    • Yeah man, idk. I’m not super big on looking at the position group overall and damning the group. I’ll do the same with less words for WR. I think Proctor is the ultimate fit because he could be your future left or right tackle or left or right guard. Guys a starter, how much Zavala, Christensen, Curhan, and Corbett did we see last year again? Mauigoa will not be there when we pick, but you take him for the same reason you take Proctor minus maybe the LT. Freeling *could* be an upgrade at LT for the future. You don’t take Miller or Iheanahor because the position flexibility isn’t there, likely RT only guys. Those Utah guys are light in the ass, don’t want. Now I do WR. All extremely unproductive when compared to previous Round 1 WR. Tate- Gone Lemon- Complete player, not a burner, would take at 19 Tyson- Made of glass, Colorado washout  Cooper- Not the best hands. Like 300 of his yards were lucky ass stumble blooper looking poo. Bernard gives you similar but better in the 2nd. KC- Slaps then catches the ball. Lightning fast for about 20 yards. Good return man. poo QBs probably more to unlock. Would take at 19 if Proctor, Freeling, Lemon were gone. Washington guy- Lumbers, the smoothness Canales hyped for TMac, not there with him. We need a different style player.    
    • Logically yes. Boston has the right balance though. Jalen Brown is #2 in the paint and their best shooters are 17th and 19th. While our best shooters are #1 and #2 and we have one player in the top 50 for points in the paint. And my understanding looking at the information I just referenced is we were basically at the exact same paint percentage last year in Charles Lee's offense. At the end of the day we either want to compete for a playoff series winner and the finals or we just want to stumble our way to another play in. We've already done that with James Borrego.
×
×
  • Create New...