Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What will it take to FIRE Gettleman?


GoobyPls

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, carolinajay said:

He had 2 months to sign it. No i'm no Gettleman homer he has made mistakes but I remember what it was like before him.

Who the fug sign the franchise tag in April????

 

Should Elway have cut Von Miller?

 

Its called trying to get leverage every player that gets franchised does it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, GoobyPls said:

Who the fug sign the franchise tag in April????

 

Should Elway have cut Von Miller?

 

Its called trying to get leverage every player that gets franchised does it.

Greg Hardy signed it within a couple of days.

No, who cuts the SB MVP at the most premier defensive position. Von would've got that contract from all 32 teams.

I can't argue that was a big reason the tag was pulled because Gettleman didn't think the headache was worth it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, carolinajay said:

Greg Hardy signed it within a couple of days.

No, who cuts the SB MVP at the most premier defensive position. Von would've got that contract from all 32 teams.

I can't argue that was a big reason the tag was pulled because Gettleman didn't think the headache was worth it.

Hardy is a anomaly, most players hold out until training camp or if one side caves in.

 

Who cuts an all-pro corner coming off his best season???

 

Well Gettleman thought wrong, anyone with half a brain could see it was a moronic move

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

Hardy is a anomaly, most players hold out until training camp or if one side caves in.

 

Who cuts an all-pro corner coming off his best season???

 

Well Gettleman thought wrong, anyone with half a brain could see it was a moronic move

What bothers me the most is that gettleman thought 3 rookies cb were better than drafting just one cb and going after a FA corner.. I mean my god he had 20m to spend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, GoobyPls said:

Hardy is a anomaly, most players hold out until training camp or if one side caves in.

 

Who cuts an all-pro corner coming off his best season???

 

Well Gettleman thought wrong, anyone with half a brain could see it was a moronic move

If it became crystal clear that the relationship was not going to work why continue to negotiate.

If Josh was 24 or 25 it would have made sense to pay him what he wanted, he will be 30 next year. Darrelle Revis was never super fact but had great fundamentals has loss a step. Josh was the best CB in the league and excels in zone coverage once he loses that half step he will be playing safety.

Last year at his SB conference Gettleman said he watched hours of tape on Michael Oher. Somebody who does all that homework knows what they are doing in the short term it will hurt but soon it will pay off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, carolinajay said:

If it became crystal clear that the relationship was not going to work why continue to negotiate.

If Josh was 24 or 25 it would have made sense to pay him what he wanted, he will be 30 next year. Darrelle Revis was never super fact but had great fundamentals has loss a step. Josh was the best CB in the league and excels in zone coverage once he loses that half step he will be playing safety.

Last year at his SB conference Gettleman said he watched hours of tape on Michael Oher. Somebody who does all that homework knows what they are doing in the short term it will hurt but soon it will pay off.

So you make him play under the 1 year tag while you get the  rookies up to speed.. His age is the reason he will play that 1 year to get to the season where we couldn't tag him...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Toolbox said:

several good ones were on the market.. notably prince amukamara, janoris jenkins, and yes sean smith.. sean smith went to the raiders btw

Gettleman had prince in NY.

You may as well pay Josh if you pay what NY paid for jenkins

Smith is having a tough year. Cooks roasted him too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, WOW!! said:

So you make him play under the 1 year tag while you get the  rookies up to speed.. His age is the reason he will play that 1 year to get to the season where we couldn't tag him.

He tried to.

I really do not think he wanted to be here. He wanted to be the star he wanted more attention, A disgruntled Josh is not what Gettleman wanted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, carolinajay said:

If it became crystal clear that the relationship was not going to work why continue to negotiate.

If Josh was 24 or 25 it would have made sense to pay him what he wanted, he will be 30 next year. Darrelle Revis was never super fact but had great fundamentals has loss a step. Josh was the best CB in the league and excels in zone coverage once he loses that half step he will be playing safety.

Last year at his SB conference Gettleman said he watched hours of tape on Michael Oher. Somebody who does all that homework knows what they are doing in the short term it will hurt but soon it will pay off.

What relationships? The one between Gettleman and Norman really? Who gives a fug if a GM doesn't like a player.

 

Of good god now you can see the future, Norman was 28 he had 4?great years ahead of him at the very least. All pro players just don't fall off the face of the earth.

 

The mental gymnastics you are going through to argue a wrong cause is amazing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, GoobyPls said:

What relationships? The one between Gettleman and Norman really? Who gives a fug if a GM doesn't like a player.

 

Of good god now you can see the future, Norman was 28 he had 4?great years ahead of him at the very least. All pro players just don't fall off the face of the earth.

 

The mental gymnastics you are going through to argue a wrong cause is amazing

Norman/Panthers

Age was a factor. Sherman got his money when he was 25-26. Revis got big money last year at a advanced age it is not paying off.

Who knows the team better than Gettleman? he did what he thought was right for the team. 

The reason why gettleman was the right choice for the team is because he's not going to make decisions on emotions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, carolinajay said:

What relationships? The one between Gettleman and Norman really? Who gives a fug if a GM doesn't like a player.

You can't keep every player its up to the GM to decide who to keep. Why would Gettleman hate norman he performed at a all pro level last year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...