Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bradberry at practice. Do you sit Worley or McClain?


Leeroy Jenkins PhD

Recommended Posts

Finished the 2nd half. Leonard Johnson is really popping out even though I'm trying to focus solely on Worley. Much cleaner 2nd quarter by Worley (same quarter that his sack + pass deflection came in). I'm not sure who miscommunicated on the TD: Coleman or Worley.

3rd quarter Worley makes a pretty nice play. Carries Fitz out of bounds off of the snap, turns around as soon as he gets Fitz out of bounds in time to see Palmer toss it to Johnson, and gets in for the stop with Boston. Big difference between those two is that Worley is consistently wrapping up, and for all I've said questioning him I do have to give credit where credit is due. 

Good Lord, Leonard Johnson is literally in every pile. In it. Not around it like Boston. In it. Like this play where he just sacked Palmer. Worley will work his way into the pile as well if he's not there at the start.

DJ Humphries got abused.

Ew. Fitz decleated Worley on the 21yd screen to Johnson towards the end. 

 

tldr; Start Worley as he seems to get more comfortable as the game goes on. Leonard Johnson is the real deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

You make all three active and see who plays the best and how they hold up. I figure all of them will get in the game

 

Johnson in the slot. Worley outside. Let Bradberry start, if he holds up, we are gold. Use McClain for support, and hope you don't need Sanchez.

 

If that group can hold it together, we can be pretty good. Too bad we had such an horrific start.

 

AND, it is all defendant on the pass rush continuing to eat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...