Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Leadership, ron rivera, and the variable rigidity of discipline

PhillyB

By PhillyB,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

PhillyB Grand Master

PhillyB

Posted
Posted

Ron Rivera's shit stinks. We all know it, the whole team knows it, the whole fanbase knows it, even Ron Rivera knows it. You can see it in his poke-hole eyes as they glower off into some other dimension where the bubonic plague looking acne scars on his cheek aren't better play callers than Mike Shula. So since there's no point in prefacing this post with the obvious, there are two competing thoughts on what happened tonight:

(1) Cam Newton didn't bring his tie on the plane. Whatever, you keep the discipline in-house.

(2) Cam Newton didn't bring his tie on the plane. Whatever, you don't bend the rules for one player.

 

Let's address both of these points even though one of them is laughably retarded for reasons I will explain. First, point number one, which is not retarded. I would like to point out that JESUS CHRIST ON A CRACKER IT'S A FUCKING TIE. ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME?!?!?!?!?!?! I thought maybe he wore a hashtag fire Shula shirt or nut checked a security guard like that fake Bleacher Report tweet suggested. But it was a TIE. That's stupid enough. Even stupider than getting legit mad about it is benching him for it. Even stupider than benching him for it is benching him for it during a primetime game when he's already constantly taking media heat and you know this move will bring an unholy shitstorm down onto your football team. And even stupider than all that is taking your MVP off the field when you're still in the playoff hunt against a hungry team, a traditional foe, and sacrificing a shot at the playoffs to make some sort of a point about the way things are done around here. This is such a staggering exposure of Ron's lack of judgement and composition as a coach that there are few choices besides kicking him out of the plane over Idaho with a parachute and a bag of chips.

But let's humor the second argument for a second. It's actually completely true. It's a fact that you don't bend the rules for one player. That creates locker room division. No one actually disputes that.  Anyone who's taken intro level sociology courses in college knows institutionalization is necessary for the development of teamwork, and institutionalization can't happen if one guy's treated preferentially. But that is a bullshit argument because the issue is not the crime, it's the punishment.

Ultimately it's Ron Rivera not knowing when to back off. And sometimes you do back off. You have to. Ten or so years ago I was in Marine Corps OCS up in Quantico in the world's most intensive leadership school, surrounded by elite drill instructors whose personal mission it was to pound discipline and code into a bunch of soft ass braniac college kids trying to be hard asses. If there was ever a place you don't fuck up and forget your tie (or muzzle control or your fucking compass, jeebus that was a bad day) it's officer training in the Marines. Not a dumb football game. But even in OCS the drill instructors had the wisdom to know there are times you back off of rigid disciplinarian structure for the betterment of the group. There were times when tensions ran high (dropped candidates, silver bullet, OCS version of the crucible) when the DIs backed off of the billy badass routine even if it was warranted because they had the wisdom to understand they'd lose more respect by enforcing something petty at a very bad time than they'd gain authority points for being ticky-tack. In fact they often gained respect and promoted group cohesion by knowing when not to enforce things that they had the right to enforce whenever they wanted.

Ron Rivera doesn't possess that wisdom as far as I can tell. To this point his only real outstanding strength as a head coach was his ability to develop a team's intangibles and manage its locker room, but this evening he compromised even that en route to dishing us a head start on our only blowout loss of the season and knocking us out of the playoff running against a hated rival.

Goodbye Ron.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stankowalski Newbie

stankowalski

Posted
Posted

Meh...he only took him out for one play.  Kind of messed up how that play went though lol.  I'm not going to get into whether or not it was the right thing to do because frankly I don't think we'd have won that game under any circumstances with all the injuries to key positions and key players.  

All I know is this season stinks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TylerDurden Grand Master

TylerDurden

Posted
Posted

I know teams shouldn't be wrapped up in headlines and all, but what made it that much worse for me as a fan was seeing ol' Dick Sherman on Gameday Live after the game saying, "a lot of our fans weren't happy with some of the things Cam did last year, so I know a lot of them are happy with what happened tonight."

fug you Sherm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

If I'm looking at the consequences, I just have a hard time buying that there'd be some major revolt in the locker room if Newton went unpunished for not wearing a tie. 

I don't buy that the Panthers locker room is that petty, and if it were, we'd have larger issues.

But even if I did believe that would cause a ruckus, I have a hard time believing it'd be a bigger mess than the result of that first play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • outlaw4
      That's it. How do you feel about this draft class.

      By outlaw4 · Posted

      Not one single pick that is asking me why we drafted a guy in the first place. It was a guy we needed and/or a guy that had certain traits making them stand out. Best of all, I feel everyone we drafted are capable of stepping onto the field this year and have a meaningful role (even Kuwatch on special teams). Obviously, nothing is guaranteed but I'm not seeing any huge flags on guys because they're risky projects or massive overreaches.
    • MHS831
      A look at the team after the draft and udfa signings...

      By MHS831 · Posted

      Here is how Morgan is strategic-He re-signs Scott because he was not going S in round 1--he had the chance, and he did not.  He saw the top of the draft at T and knew none of them would be ready to start day 1, so he signs a veteran to a one-year deal, giving his tackle selection a chance to learn and prepare for what might be LT or RT.  Those two moves suggested, perhaps ironically because they contradict each other, what he was going to do, based on the talent pool.  He never brought in a Robinson replacement at DE/NT, and then moves up to draft one.   I almost wonder if the intent was to draft DT/DE all along at some point, maybe with a trade back, but then Freeling dropped to them.   Of course, we felt that they were looking WR, and wonder if the plan was to draft a WR in round 2 if you traded back in round 1.  However, when Freeling was there, the trade back fell apart.  Then we traded up for Hunter.  We could stick with XL and hope Metchie steps up, so we sat still in round three and took Brazell II, a 1000 yard speedster and perfect Z WR.  What a break. At that time, CB and Center were our biggest needs, and with several possible centers on the board and a good fit for our defense at CB, we grabbed Will Lee III.  Lee and Thornton have people in front of them, but I think Morgan knew we needed a guy who can play the outside and press--and probably step in as Jackson's replacement in 2027.    After making trades to get back into the fifth round, where we grabbed one of the best centers in the draft.  This is significant because we signed Fortner to a one-year deal; maybe Morgan saw what some of us saw--the center position is strong in this draft--on day 3, and day 3 players need a year, in most cases.  Moments later, a safety they had been talking to whose skill set matched what we are looking for in a FS.  As stated, Scott was signed,  but the fact that the Panthers were talking to Wheatley and not Theiemann means that they might have known they were not going FS early, but would need a developmental FS later--which explains why we signed Scott.  So if you pay attention to the one-year, vet deals, you can tell where we planned to sign later-round, developmental players.  What positions did we draft early that did not have 1-year veterans signed in front of them:  DL (Hunter) and WR (I don't count Metchie because I count starting-level players). I would not be surprised to learn later that the plan was DT and WR in rounds 1 and 2--then Freeling fell.  Notice that Freeling--from Mt Pleasant SC, did not come in for a visit.  Most of the other OT candidates had short arms or were certain to be gone. I don't think Freeling was in their plans.  I think a trade back and Hunter and maybe Boston was the vision.  I am guessing that CB was also high on their list.   So in this draft, we got 
    • frankw
      OFFICIAL 2026 Undrafted Free Agent Thread

      By frankw · Posted

      This is one area I think that is not getting enough exposure in the midst of all the optimism. I like Chuba a great deal from a personal standpoint but he has largely proven nothing on a consistent basis yet. He's had the one season of production but before that most people pegged us as moving on. And last year injuries or not he just did not have that juice. The rest of the guys are completely unproven. I don't see anyone among the group having a game or a handful of games worth of high level production the way Rico Dowdle did last year. And yeah he dropped off and yeah he got an attitude about our incompetent handling of the touches which was honestly justified on his part and he moved on but he did legitimately save our season. That's what it is going to take to seize control of the NFC South. We all know that we will not be passing all over defenses. It is what it is. So who amongst this RB group is capable of doing that? And if we are struggling to run the ball AND pass are we going to revert to making excuses for our coach and QB again? That is definitely getting old.
×
×
  • Create New...