Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Funchess vs. Collins


FootballLivesMatter

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, KSpan said:

And Collins, a guy with a whopping 5 pass breakups and 1 int (today) thus far in his young career, is the one that KB beat for his TD. What's the point?

Collins has contributed more to this team than Funchess has, also secondary players get beat all the time. Funchess is a lesser talented version of KB that doesn't provide any unique skill set to the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, sanjay_rajput said:

Collins has contributed more to this team than Funchess has, also secondary players get beat all the time. Funchess is a lesser talented version of KB that doesn't provide any unique skill set to the team.

Ya know, Olsen isn't getting any younger, and Funch was a TE in college (right?). Couldn't we try molding him back into a TE to backup and maybe replace Olsen in 3 or 4 years?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, donttreadonme said:

Ya know, Olsen isn't getting any younger, and Funch was a TE in college (right?). Couldn't we try molding him back into a TE to backup and maybe replace Olsen in 3 or 4 years?

haha tell me this was a joke, he can't even out muscle Collins he would get eaten up as a TE, KB has better body mold for a TE. I got a better idea why not just draft an actual TE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, sanjay_rajput said:

haha tell me this was a joke, he can't even out muscle Collins he would get eaten up as a TE, KB has better body mold for a TE. I got a better idea why not just draft an actual TE.

Why waste a draft pick when Olsen can play another 3 years at a high level? Throw Funch in the weight room. I really (want) to like the guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, sanjay_rajput said:

Collins has contributed more to this team than Funchess has, also secondary players get beat all the time. Funchess is a lesser talented version of KB that doesn't provide any unique skill set to the team.

Jalen Collins:

23 games played (7 starts), around 30 tackles, 5 PBUs, 1 int.

Devin Funchess:

34 games played incl. playoffs (15 starts), 55 catches for 900 yards and 10 TDs.

'Contributed more'... Nope. Funchess isn't perfect but your argument is very flawed.

6 minutes ago, Icege said:

Collins was being called a bust all last season and for a good chunk of this.

Let's leave reason out of threads like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, KSpan said:

Jalen Collins:

23 games played (7 starts), around 30 tackles, 5 PBUs, 1 int.

Devin Funchess:

34 games played incl. playoffs (15 starts), 55 catches for 900 yards and 10 TDs.

'Contributed more'... Nope. Funchess isn't perfect but your argument is very flawed.

Let's leave reason out of threads like this.

Reasons like this is 2nd year & he didn't play until week 4 after serving a suspension. Took over for Trufant & hasn't looked back. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No you dont.  He had all those records for years before his final season. Whether career or season he had them all years before his final season in which he played 6 games.
    • Williams covered for Moore by saying they were on the wrong page about Moores specific route. Williams could have easily covered for him by saying he messed up. Suggesting only 1 route was ever intended to be a viable target is absurd.
    • I am going to agree with Linville this time--I think we need to get a veteran edge (We have Jones II, Scourton, and Princely--2 developmental guys and a decent veteran).  We don't really think of Jones because he had a hamstring injury weeks 3 and 4 and a back that required surgery Week 6-17.  He still managed 10 pressures, and he will be 28.  Princely Umanmielen only played in approximately 18-20% of the snaps and he struggled at times.  Basically, he was a situational pass rusher.  He got 1.5 sacks and 10 pressures.  He should improve, but for now, he is what he is.  Scourton gives us hope.  For a rookie (and thanks to Jones II's injuries, he was given more PT), he had 8 sacks--and held the edge.  He played at a first-round draft pick level.  He has the potential to become "that guy" in 2026. We lose Wonnum, who played nearly 700 snaps and amassed 3 whole sacks.  For a person raised a Gamecock, I would not be upset if we purged our roster of all South Carolina alumni.   However, I see it this way:  Wonnum was decent holding the edge, something Patrick Jones II and Scourton have demonstrated at a high level.  He is a liability, if you ask me.    Jones had 7 sacks one season in Minnesota and is known for his inside rushing ability--not what you would call a speed rusher.  I think Princely was a bit disappointing, but he was a bit raw.  Out of college, they described him as being a bit predictable.  I see no reason he will not improve in 2026 and become a situational pass rusher.   Basically, with Scourton and Princely expected to continue to develop and Jones II returning from injury, I think we need another veteran (if we can get a good one) to give us balance and depth.  A third developmental player is not ideal.   Draft:  OT, LB, WR, OL depth, S. Free Agency:  Edge, possibly a WR;  re-sign Mays, Cuhran, BC (??), and Nijman.  Let walk:  Wonnum, Scott, Dowdle.  I see about $20m per year after signing the OL depth.  Spend it on a veteran edge.   Players like Reddick (Tampa), Bosa (Buffalo), Khalil Mack (LAC) could be available on a one or two year deal in the $15m range.  We could splurge here, but I think a veteran situational pass rusher (depending on Jones II's back) is all we need while our 2 young guns develop.    
×
×
  • Create New...