Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tanking


Eazy-E

Recommended Posts

So many people keep bringing up tanking and I don't understand why. Can any of you give an example of tanking actually working? 

The Timberwolves and 76ers both still suck and are the best most recent examples of teams that tank every year.

Also what good are draft picks when your team proves every year that they are terrible at evaluating and drafting talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Eazy-E said:

 

Also what good are draft picks when your team proves every year that they are terrible at evaluating and drafting talent.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Eazy-E said:

So many people keep bringing up tanking and I don't understand why. Can any of you give an example of tanking actually working? 

The Timberwolves and 76ers both still suck and are the best most recent examples of teams that tank every year.

Also what good are draft picks when your team proves every year that they are terrible at evaluating and drafting talent.

Well, other than the dummies like Timberwolves, 76ers and Bobcats whom are terrible at drafting you do have some examples that actually been successful at it. Like, GSW (Curry, Klay, Green), Portland (Lillard, McCollum), OKC (KD, Westbrook, Harden, Adams, Kanter), Indiana (George, Hibbert, Lance). 

 

However, this is probably not the year to tank. Not any great stars coming out imo. Plus, too late to start tanking. And when you are putting it on the brain of Rich Cho to draft, go head and five fingers your asshole. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Guest Oh wow said:

Well, other than the dummies like Timberwolves, 76ers and Bobcats whom are terrible at drafting you do have some examples that actually been successful at it. Like, GSW (Curry, Klay, Green), Portland (Lillard, McCollum), OKC (KD, Westbrook, Harden, Adams, Kanter), Indiana (George, Hibbert, Lance). 

 

However, this is probably not the year to tank. Not any great stars coming out imo. Plus, too late to start tanking. And when you are putting it on the brain of Rich Cho to draft, go head and five fingers your asshole. 

None of the teams you mentioned truly "tanked" or had a number 1 pick. You can still end up with good players or get lucky with the lottery if you don't full blown tank. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is why the NBA is screwed up.  Even if you're terrible, for years, you still may not find that impact player or even be able to because of how the lottery is (and most likely rigged).    Unless you're one of the top 4 superteams now, it's probably just not happening.   So you have like 26 teams that know they need to be terrible and get lucky on a superstar, IF they get that draft pick lol.    It's just not very competitive.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Gossip Girl
14 hours ago, Eazy-E said:

None of the teams you mentioned truly "tanked" or had a number 1 pick. You can still end up with good players or get lucky with the lottery if you don't full blown tank. 

OKC did tank.

2007: Seattle #2

2008: Seattle #4

2009: OKC #3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Gossip Girl
14 hours ago, Eazy-E said:

None of the teams you mentioned truly "tanked" or had a number 1 pick. You can still end up with good players or get lucky with the lottery if you don't full blown tank. 

GSW: 

2009: Curry #7

2010: Epke Udoh #6

2011: Klay #11

2012: Barnes #7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am high, but that’s besides the point! The blue line is not good right now. I’ve said it all year. I don’t think this group meshes well. Slaven has been just OK Niki up and down Miller up and down ghost and Walker have been your most consistent guys. Maybe it comes together more towards the playoffs
    • I was expecting to see more cap room moves by now, which may be to suggest that we are not going to be that aggressive.  I have mixed emotions about that (because I think we have 3 needs on D and 3 needs on O--starters).  If you look to the draft for 3 starters, that is ambitious.  We need 6
    • Yeah we shouldn’t be competing with teams, bidding wise, to sign a WR. There will be one for us and our budget.  I keep saying, how many balls will there be to go around anyway? One thing good I will say for this offense is the ball has been spread around at times. Seems like I remember seeing a large number of guys have caught passes in a game. Or been targeted at least. 3 RBs 4 or 5 WRs 2-3 TEs type of stat lines. 10-11 guys.  Not every week but that happens.    As far as WR in general, we need the smaller agile and quicker component to compliment what is there. After that it should be about depth, having good backups for the starters so we can run things consistently still, if a guy is out for a week or two. That is especially important in game where you have to finish the game with who you made active. 
×
×
  • Create New...