Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bradberry named highest rated corner by PFF

mc52beast

By mc52beast,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, uncfan888 said:

So what you're saying is that most teams don't get to enjoy rookie corners playing at an elite level except for a year or two.  While we get to enjoy Bradberry being there for 3 more years on the cheap.  Sweet

He didn't play great. He played better than any other rookie.  He was not ranked in the top 15 as a cornerback. He is hardly elite. Remember we had the worse secondary in the league. What kind of mind warp are you guys in? By the end of the season he was pretty good but early on he was pretty bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Saca312 said:

Oh, I guess being top 20 as a rookie is garbage to you. Oh okay.

"Hardly Elite"

There is a huge difference between not elite and garbage. Why do posters like you try to discredit someone else's post by always misrepresenting what they said by using extreme language they never said?  You can respond to what I said without making things up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Saca312 Experienced

Saca312

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

There is a huge difference between not elite and garbage. Why do posters like you try to discredit someone else's post by always misrepresenting what they said by using extreme language they never said?  You can respond to what I said without making things up.

Making things up?

41 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

He didn't play great. He played better than any other rookie.  He was not ranked in the top 15 as a cornerback. He is hardly elite. Remember we had the worse secondary in the league. What kind of mind warp are you guys in? By the end of the season he was pretty good but early on he was pretty bad.

Didn't play great means he wasn't that good or at the "solid" level yet according to most definitions and uses of such. You used negative connotation and descriptions in your proposed "analysis" of such a player, insinuating he was not "up to standards" or "good." 

Your post describes a very negative, extreme POV about a rookie who excelled and played at a high level. You stated the fact "Uh bu-bu- he's not a top 15 corner" while surrounding such a statement with harsh terminology such as "hardly elite" and "didn't play great," hence my mockery of such idiotic statements about a rookie who shut down Julio.

Considering you have not even emitted a positive vocabulary term in your analysis, one can easily conclude such vitriolic language is an attack on the credibility of such a young, upstart player. Your argument concerning my "unfair use" of extreme language is null, in the fact you provide a negative extreme interpretation of such a player.

Seriously, remedy such wrongdoing by insinuating a "positive" term in your description of Bradberry if you believe my term for "garbage" from my conclusion of such statements is in the wrong. Hard-pressed currently to find a positive from your statement aside your ending part, which was then followed by a negative connotative detail; effectively negating any positive message from such.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted
Just now, Saca312 said:

Making things up?

Didn't play great means he wasn't that good or at the "solid" level yet according to most definitions and uses of such. You used negative connotation and descriptions in your proposed "analysis" of such a player, insinuating he was not "up to standards" or "good." 

Your post describes a very negative, extreme POV about a rookie who excelled and played at a high level. You stated the fact "Uh bu-bu- he's not a top 15 corner" while surrounding such a statement with harsh terminology such as "hardly elite" and "didn't play great," hence my mockery of such idiotic statements about a rookie who shut down Julio.

Considering you have not even emitted a positive vocabulary term in your analysis, one can easily conclude such vitriolic language is an attack on the credibility of such a young, upstart player. Your argument concerning my "unfair use" of extreme language is null, in the fact you provide a negative extreme interpretation of such a player.

Seriously, remedy such wrongdoing by insinuating a "positive" term in your description of Bradberry if you believe my term for "garbage" from my conclusion of such statements is in the wrong. Hard-pressed currently to find a positive from your statement aside your ending part, which was then followed by a negative connotative detail; effectively negating any positive message from such.

 

 You said I said he was garbage and nowhere did I come close. I said he started off playing poorly and by the end of year played pretty well. I said that was hardly elite which in my definition means  top 5 or at least top 10. I have said elsewhere I expect him to continue to improve. The reality is that I don't blame him for struggling. I blame Gettleman for starting him day 1 instead of easing him into the lineup by bringing in a vet and working him into the secondary.

No, you can spin this anyway you want to justify your extreme characterization of my.position but you are wrong. I am positive about Bradbury's future yet realistic about how he has played up to this point. Something apparently in short supply.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Saca312 Experienced

Saca312

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, panthers55 said:

 You said I said he was garbage and nowhere did I come close. I said he started off playing poorly and by the end of year played pretty well. I said that was hardly elite which in my definition means  top 5 or at least top 10. I have said elsewhere I expect him to continue to improve. The reality is that I don't blame him for struggling. I blame Gettleman for starting him day 1 instead of easing him into the lineup by bringing in a vet and working him into the secondary.

No, you can spin this anyway you want to justify your extreme characterization of my.position but you are wrong. I am positive about Bradbury's future yet realistic about how he has played up to this point. Something apparently in short supply.

Thanks for clarifying. Fair assessment. He is pretty solid so far, but I agree he's not elite just yet.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...