Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bradberry named highest rated corner by PFF

mc52beast

By mc52beast,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, uncfan888 said:

So what you're saying is that most teams don't get to enjoy rookie corners playing at an elite level except for a year or two.  While we get to enjoy Bradberry being there for 3 more years on the cheap.  Sweet

He didn't play great. He played better than any other rookie.  He was not ranked in the top 15 as a cornerback. He is hardly elite. Remember we had the worse secondary in the league. What kind of mind warp are you guys in? By the end of the season he was pretty good but early on he was pretty bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Saca312 said:

Oh, I guess being top 20 as a rookie is garbage to you. Oh okay.

"Hardly Elite"

There is a huge difference between not elite and garbage. Why do posters like you try to discredit someone else's post by always misrepresenting what they said by using extreme language they never said?  You can respond to what I said without making things up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Saca312 Experienced

Saca312

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

There is a huge difference between not elite and garbage. Why do posters like you try to discredit someone else's post by always misrepresenting what they said by using extreme language they never said?  You can respond to what I said without making things up.

Making things up?

41 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

He didn't play great. He played better than any other rookie.  He was not ranked in the top 15 as a cornerback. He is hardly elite. Remember we had the worse secondary in the league. What kind of mind warp are you guys in? By the end of the season he was pretty good but early on he was pretty bad.

Didn't play great means he wasn't that good or at the "solid" level yet according to most definitions and uses of such. You used negative connotation and descriptions in your proposed "analysis" of such a player, insinuating he was not "up to standards" or "good." 

Your post describes a very negative, extreme POV about a rookie who excelled and played at a high level. You stated the fact "Uh bu-bu- he's not a top 15 corner" while surrounding such a statement with harsh terminology such as "hardly elite" and "didn't play great," hence my mockery of such idiotic statements about a rookie who shut down Julio.

Considering you have not even emitted a positive vocabulary term in your analysis, one can easily conclude such vitriolic language is an attack on the credibility of such a young, upstart player. Your argument concerning my "unfair use" of extreme language is null, in the fact you provide a negative extreme interpretation of such a player.

Seriously, remedy such wrongdoing by insinuating a "positive" term in your description of Bradberry if you believe my term for "garbage" from my conclusion of such statements is in the wrong. Hard-pressed currently to find a positive from your statement aside your ending part, which was then followed by a negative connotative detail; effectively negating any positive message from such.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted
Just now, Saca312 said:

Making things up?

Didn't play great means he wasn't that good or at the "solid" level yet according to most definitions and uses of such. You used negative connotation and descriptions in your proposed "analysis" of such a player, insinuating he was not "up to standards" or "good." 

Your post describes a very negative, extreme POV about a rookie who excelled and played at a high level. You stated the fact "Uh bu-bu- he's not a top 15 corner" while surrounding such a statement with harsh terminology such as "hardly elite" and "didn't play great," hence my mockery of such idiotic statements about a rookie who shut down Julio.

Considering you have not even emitted a positive vocabulary term in your analysis, one can easily conclude such vitriolic language is an attack on the credibility of such a young, upstart player. Your argument concerning my "unfair use" of extreme language is null, in the fact you provide a negative extreme interpretation of such a player.

Seriously, remedy such wrongdoing by insinuating a "positive" term in your description of Bradberry if you believe my term for "garbage" from my conclusion of such statements is in the wrong. Hard-pressed currently to find a positive from your statement aside your ending part, which was then followed by a negative connotative detail; effectively negating any positive message from such.

 

 You said I said he was garbage and nowhere did I come close. I said he started off playing poorly and by the end of year played pretty well. I said that was hardly elite which in my definition means  top 5 or at least top 10. I have said elsewhere I expect him to continue to improve. The reality is that I don't blame him for struggling. I blame Gettleman for starting him day 1 instead of easing him into the lineup by bringing in a vet and working him into the secondary.

No, you can spin this anyway you want to justify your extreme characterization of my.position but you are wrong. I am positive about Bradbury's future yet realistic about how he has played up to this point. Something apparently in short supply.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Saca312 Experienced

Saca312

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, panthers55 said:

 You said I said he was garbage and nowhere did I come close. I said he started off playing poorly and by the end of year played pretty well. I said that was hardly elite which in my definition means  top 5 or at least top 10. I have said elsewhere I expect him to continue to improve. The reality is that I don't blame him for struggling. I blame Gettleman for starting him day 1 instead of easing him into the lineup by bringing in a vet and working him into the secondary.

No, you can spin this anyway you want to justify your extreme characterization of my.position but you are wrong. I am positive about Bradbury's future yet realistic about how he has played up to this point. Something apparently in short supply.

Thanks for clarifying. Fair assessment. He is pretty solid so far, but I agree he's not elite just yet.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • BEASTfromdaEAST
      Most hated teams

      By BEASTfromdaEAST · Posted

      After Bountygate and the information that came out on the Saints owners shielding pedophile priests in New Orleans it will forever be the Saints numero uno for me. FUG THE SAINTS! I hope this is just the beginning of a long term period of suffering for that shitty organization run by even shittier human beings. #2.Pats/Belicheat #3. Falcons (Mike Vick years then Matt Ryan/Julio running it up) Ryan pooping his pants and 28-3 def makes my bad days always better just thinking of those. #4 Pretty much any franchise fan base thats obnoxious Steelers, Eagles, Bills, Jets, Giants, Cowboys, etc.
    • BEASTfromdaEAST
      PFF Best Rookies so far: Two Panthers

      By BEASTfromdaEAST · Posted

      Thank God DM used that #8 pick on a bona fide WR1 and not some bum pass rushing prospect like Stewart or someone else. I believe Tet is legit WR1 material and going forward will be our long term answer at that position since we desperately were in need of one once they traded away DJ Moore.  Tet could possibly end up even being better long term than someone who I respect a ton as a WR in Moore. Evans has been a pleasant surprise and great TE/FB depth piece going forward who could make the most of his opportunities.  Any good offense worth a damn in the NFL has 3 TEs that can do multiple things and being scared by Ian Thomas play for years should makes us all appreciate what Evans is quietly doing as a ROOKIE at one of the hardest positions to learn at the pro level.  Keep cooking DM. This season is not over obviously but seeing some growth out of young talent finally is a breathe of fresh fuggin air for once. 
    • mav1234
      PFF Best Rookies so far: Two Panthers

      By mav1234 · Posted

      Saw this show up in my new feed. Nice to see a couple of our rookies making it into the top 5 so far, even if it is a pff measure... From https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-top-15-rookies-week-9-2025 ... 4. TE Mitchell Evans, Carolina Panthers (78.7) Evans struggled in the Panthers’ tight win over the Packers, finishing with a 41.8 PFF overall grade — third worst among tight ends this week. He was not targeted in the game and played only one snap in pass protection. He did log 15 run-blocking snaps, and although he earned a 68.9 PFF run-blocking grade in zone looks (seven snaps), his 39.0 mark in gap schemes (second worst for the week) dragged him down to a 46.6 PFF run-blocking grade overall — sixth worst for the week. Despite seeing zero targets over his past two games, Evans still leads the Carolina tight end group with a 74.3 PFF receiving grade. He has caught all nine of his targets for 90 yards, six first downs and two touchdowns. Evans also leads the Panthers’ tight end group in PFF run-blocking grade (72.2). He has recorded a 20.5% positive play rate across 175 snaps.  5. WR Tetairoa McMillan, Carolina Panthers (78.6) McMillan had a better day against the Packers, recording four catches for 46 yards. Most of that production came in the first quarter via two 16-yard catches — one of which he snatched from Carrington Valentine’s hands, who was in perfect position to break up the pass. McMillan accounted for three first downs on the day, although Green Bay was able to limit his impact after the catch, holding him to 0.8 yards after the catch per reception. McMillan now has 41 catches for 558 yards — a top-15 mark. He is also tied for second with 19 explosive gains of 15-plus yards. Three of McMillan’s catches against the Packers came between the numbers, bringing him to 22 for 318 yards and 19 first downs (tied for second most) this season. He owns a 26.1% threat rate and a 76.6 PFF receiving grade between the numbers. He also ranks in the top 10 in explosive gains (10) and yards after the catch per reception (5.5) within that area of the field. 
×
×
  • Create New...