Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Draft Talk: Let's look at 1-7 and DL possibilities


davos

Recommended Posts

So this is arguably the deepest part of the class and I just want to break something down defensive wise.  I can for sure see at least one trade happening before 8 so we'll see.  

--

1. Cleveland (3-4)

-This looks like Garrett's landing spot no matter what happens with the team in the top position 

2. 49ers (4-3)

-They are transitioning to a 4-3 so I find this interesting.  They may target a rookie to become a rock on their line (Allen or Thomas) but other talents are possible like QB.  *edit: They have invested in DL recently so they are up in the air.  

3. Bears (3-4) *no go

-They have already heavily invested in their front 7 (Goldman, Bullard Floyd) so I think they will be looking elsewhere.  This team needs a major overhaul.  Hooker, Adams, or a QB could go here.   

4. Jaguars (3-4) *no go

-Their buzz is around similar guys we've been discussing a la Adams, Fournette, and Hooker.  They also quietly had a strong defense last year.  I see a focus on Fournette if his ankle checks out. 

5. Titans (3-4) *no go

-They seem to be fixated on finding a receiving weapon for Mariota, don't really see them going DL  

6. Jets (3-4) *no go

-Another landing spot for Fournette or a top DB (Lattimore/Humphrey).  They have Richardson, Leonard Williams, Wilkerson and McClendon...dont' see DL 

7. Chargers (3-4) *no go

-New city that doesn't want them, just went splashy with a top defensive lineman last year, I see elsewhere for their pick.  

--

I see two teams barring trades that appear as ideal landing spots for Garrett, Allen, and Thomas.

I also see two potential spots without trades for Fournette.  If his ankle checks out and the Jags don't take him, I really do see a team trading ahead of us for him.  

That leads me to this point: We're trying to guess in our many mocks which top talent will still be available at 8 and I believe that player will be Solomon Thomas.  

 I personally think we will run to the podium if he is still available.  Just wanted to do this quick rundown because I see a lot of people grabbing guys ranked online in the 10-20 range being viable at 8 but being this high in the draft, I'm thinking in the other direction.

Solomon is a name to keep an eye on, could very well be available and would fit in really nicely here. 

Feel free to copy and paste the 1-7 portion with team notes/predictions/etc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, JawnyBlaze said:

I wouldn't mind Thomas, but I'd be so disappointed if we don't get Fournette or at least Adams or Hooker (assuming we don't sign Berry). 

I see it as an unfortunate possibility

An argument can legit be made for every team ahead of us needing a boost in the secondary, and again, if Fournette won't need surgery, he is a top talent I just can't see lasting to 8.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the 49ers are switching to a 4-3, I don't see how Allen would help them. They already drafted Buckner and Armstead the past two years in the first round who are both 4-3 DTs like Allen. I honestly think he could slip to 8 especially if a QB or 2 goes before we pick. We all know G-Man would really struggle with passing on a guy like Allen if he's there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, panthers34 said:

If the 49ers are switching to a 4-3, I don't see how Allen would help them. They already drafted Buckner and Armstead the past two years in the first round who are both 4-3 DTs like Allen. I honestly think he could slip to 8 especially if a QB or 2 goes before we pick. We all know G-Man would really struggle with passing on a guy like Allen if he's there. 

Fair point on the Niners.  

I also think Lynch & Shanahan are going to want to make a statement with their pick on a top guy who should have no problem making the NFL leap; that's usually not the QB.  Basically, people are mocking QBs to the Niners but I can see them making a surprising move.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly I believe Dalvin Cook (barring off field issues) is a perfect fit for the Panthers and may be their selection. If Thomas is the pick I will not be extremely mad but I will be scratching my head as Manos said I do not see him as a fit on our defensive line. I would like Fournette but Cook put up great numbers against solid to good defenses. Fournette struggled against good defenses. While some of that could be on LSU's offensive line it says a lot about him. Cook was more consistent in college and while he is not as great of a runner as Fournette he is a better pass catcher. Could relieve some pressure from Cam Newton on blitzes as a quick dump option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Manos said:

I'm not a huge fan of Thomas as a 4-3 DE. He just doesn't strike me as twitchy or big/long enough to be an elite passrusher. His motor and instincts are great but that only gets you so far in the NFL.

Sent from my XT1254 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app
 

I understand the measurables but sometimes you've got to look at the consistency, intangibles, and production in college.  He was able to manhandle a lot of the higher level OLs in the college ranks.  

I do agree however we need that long, lean edge rushing type on this defense.  There's a good deal in the draft beyond Round 1 so we could double dip and get two guys to compliment each other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Hammerin'Cameron1 said:

He's small he's going to get neutralized by NFL tackles

You can just look at Taco and Solomon and tell Taco is the baller of the two. Solomon Thomas is a lame.

Small? He's bigger than taco. 273 vs 265. He's a bit shorter, but Thomas is bigger. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand the measurables but sometimes you've got to look at the consistency, intangibles, and production in college.  He was able to manhandle a lot of the higher level OLs in the college ranks.  

I do agree however we need that long, lean edge rushing type on this defense.  There's a good deal in the draft beyond Round 1 so we could double dip and get two guys to compliment each other.


I don't think he will be a bad player exactly, I just don't think he really fits as a 4-3 de. Honestly if he could add about 20lbs I think he would make a fantastic 3 tech DT. Don't know how his frame would handle that weight but I definitely think that is his best chance to be a great NFL player.

Sent from my XT1254 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, davos said:

Fair point on the Niners.  

I also think Lynch & Shanahan are going to want to make a statement with their pick on a top guy who should have no problem making the NFL leap; that's usually not the QB.  Basically, people are mocking QBs to the Niners but I can see them making a surprising move.   

Yea, Fournette

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Manos said:


I don't think he will be a bad player exactly, I just don't think he really fits as a 4-3 de. Honestly if he could add about 20lbs I think he would make a fantastic 3 tech DT. Don't know how his frame would handle that weight but I definitely think that is his best chance to be a great NFL player.

Sent from my XT1254 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app
 

What I see a lot of sites commenting is that he's a 2 down 4-3 DE who slides to 3-tech on passing downs.  Although, I see 3 down potential and a plug-and-play talent.

Also: I understand it's more than just weight+height combo when talking frame but don't forget our own Charles Johnson is 6'2 275.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...