Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Some Cause For Concern Regarding Cam?


TylerDurden

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, WarHeel said:


Don't forget those PT's that you threw under the bus in the last comment. They're pretty good themselves. Especially those who are fortunate enough to be on a stage to work with high level athletes like our QB emoji6.png


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

i didn't throw them under the bus. I just said the PT's tried working on Cam with no success, so surgery was a last resort. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

I'm well aware of the advancements that can be made in 12 years, but from everything I've read, the surgery is the same as it was 12 years ago.  The number of QBs who failed to return to form after that same surgery cited in the article is significant.

First of all Pennington completely tore his rotator cuff twice not once. This is a partial year. Brees didn't tear his rotator cuff he bruised it which meant it was injured but not torn.

Roethlisburger did have a partial tear in 2009 IIRC and is still playing today with no Ill effects. He didn't even have surgery so it may have been less of an injury than Cam or he heals easier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for your insight, but in my defense, as I cited, multiple medical experts stated on various outlets that nugget about not knowing whether it was a complete tear until they got into surgery.  So, i was just sharing that for informed context, not based off of my own assumptions.  But, i trust your informed opinion here, and am certainly hoping this is the scenario that plays out.

No problem [emoji108]🏼
I would agree to an extent that you don't really know the EXTENT of the damage until you get inside but I would argue based more for early grades of tears like 1 or 2. Athletes like Cam will not present with significant functional deficiencies with milder tears like most normal human beings would because he is conditioned so well. However, when the RTC is completely torn that will present fairly obviously as it is impossible to present with normal range of motion and most cases strength without some sort of compensation.


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i didn't throw them under the bus. I just said the PT's tried working on Cam with no success, so surgery was a last resort. 

Fair enough. Just know that PT's and other medical professionals can only do so much. It's up to the patients and athletes to be compliant with the education and exercises (or lack thereof) that they are given. If Cam or the coaches for that matter want him to push through an injury that shouldn't be reflected on his medical staff.


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

First of all Pennington completely tore his rotator cuff twice not once. This is a partial year. Brees didn't tear his rotator cuff he bruised it which meant it was injured but not torn.

Roethlisburger did have a partial tear in 2009 IIRC and is still playing today with no Ill effects. He didn't even have surgery so it may have been less of an injury than Cam or he heals easier.

he actually did partially tear it. the fact that he came back from a fully torn labrum and partially torn rotator cuff gives me a little more confidence that Cam will be just fine.

Quote

Andrews has talked about Brees' 2006 shoulder repair as one of the most unique in his career. He reportedly used 12 anchors, which was the most he had ever used at the time, to repair a complete 360-degree tear of Brees' labrum. In addition, Andrews reportedly repaired at least a partial tear in the rotator cuff.

Brees said Wednesday that "in a lot of ways it was the best thing that ever happened to me," because he learned how to strengthen the shoulder more than he ever had before the injury.

"When I dislocated my shoulder back in 2005 and rehabbed it throughout 2006, I was told right then by Dr. Andrews, ‘You're always gonna have to stay on top of this shoulder. You're always gonna have to do a little bit extra just to keep it at the level you want to keep it at,'" said Brees, who explained that "I started doing things I had never done before" as far as maintenance.

"I felt my shoulder was stronger than it ever had been before after that rehab process," Brees said. "And I just stayed on a lot of those things. And those are things that I continue to fine-tune, continue to add to, maybe tweak a little bit each and every offseason."

Brees, 36, said there is always a concern about risking further damage when it comes to a throwing shoulder. But he said with this particular injury, that risk is not overly concerning.

Brees said the decision of whether to play Sunday at Carolina will be based more on how strong and effective he feels, which is why he said it will ultimately be his decision.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, WarHeel said:


No problem
I would agree to an extent that you don't really know the EXTENT of the damage until you get inside but I would argue based more for early grades of tears like 1 or 2. Athletes like Cam will not present with significant functional deficiencies with milder tears like most normal human beings would because he is conditioned so well. However, when the RTC is completely torn that will present fairly obviously as it is impossible to present with normal range of motion and most cases strength without some sort of compensation.


 

Do you believe his surgery is more of a detriment to his long-term outcome than had he been able to avoid it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, E CaT PanTHer 2 said:

he actually did partially tear it. the fact that he came back from a fully torn labrum and partially torn rotator cuff gives me a little more confidence that Cam will be just fine.

 

The bruise I was reporting was after this surgery and only kept him out one week. What you are talking about was the original surgery in 2006.  I didn't clarify what I was referring to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And here is another informative article, more recent on athletes and labrum injuries.  It kind of addresses the lack of significant advancements in shoulder prodecures because the shoulder is one of the most intricate parts of the human anatomy.  They quoted a surgeon as saying it is like putting a puzzle together without the box top.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2014510-shoulder-labrum-surgery-an-inside-look-at-baseballs-toughest-injury

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And here is another informative article, more recent on athletes and labrum injuries.  It kind of addresses the lack of significant advancements in shoulder prodecures because the shoulder is one of the most intricate parts of the human anatomy.  They quoted a surgeon as saying it is like putting a puzzle together without the box top.
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2014510-shoulder-labrum-surgery-an-inside-look-at-baseballs-toughest-injury

Realizing too that a labral tear and a tear of the rotator cuff are two completely different injuries. I understood it as Cam has the latter.


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Actually that 4400 was based on a 16 game season to match Bryce's 16 games this year. Your offense has to be to drive the ball when it matters. Bryce doesn't do that with any level of consistency. If you're building a team that isn't focused on your QB, then fine. Then there's no need to pay Bryce as a franchise QB because literally anyone else will do. If you're going to pay him 50m plus per season, you have to be able to put the team on his shoulders and know he's going to carry the load. So far, when the pressure is on to get it done, Bryce has fallen miserably short of the target. 4-6 to finish out the season and 0-2 when all we need is a win to secure a playoff spot isn't stepping up and proving yourself as a franchise QB. I'd say it's quite the opposite.  There isn't a single coach in this league that would take Bryce over Burrow and very few if any that would take Bryce over Prescott. Hurts didn't have to throw in 2025 because Philly's defense was disgusting and Saquan had a MVP season. But then again, Hurts has shown that he can when it counts, and then there's his signature. Philly runs the tush push to lethal perfection, but that's a play we can't even consider with Bryce. You used 3 QBs from teams that had no defense to show QB stats don't always matter. When we had the worst defense in the NFL, we didn't see Bryce step up and carry the offense and put up gaudy numbers in a losing season because we were playing catch up. It was pretty much the opposite.  What have we seen from Bryce consistently to consider offering him a top 10 NFL franchise QB level contract? At the end of the day, that's all that matters.   
    • I mean, what fanbase has high expectations when you have a QB like Bryce leading your team?
    • If you pay Bryce $50M a year you greatly limit your ability to put the type of team around him you need to have to have a chance to win. THAT is the problem. Hell, we can't win with him on a rookie contract. How the hell are we supposed to start winning with him paying him like a franchise QB and having to make tough roster decisions to accommodate his cap hit? 
×
×
  • Create New...