Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who are your top 4?


Dex

Recommended Posts

Let's say there are no trade downs/trade ups and we are locked in at our picks. Who are your 4 selections through the first 3 rounds? Let's be realistic with a dash of optimism.

 

#8 - Solomon Thomas DE Stanford

#40 - David Njoku TE Miami

#64 - Alvin Kamara RB Tennessee

#98 - Josh Jones SS N.C. State

 

Given my mind is constantly changing and it will probably change in a few minutes considering I don't address OL or WR but I'd like to get a feel for what the Huddle would like in the first 3 rounds. Kthnxbai.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Dex said:

Let's say there are some trade downs/trade ups and we are locked in at our picks. Who are your 4 selections through the first 3 rounds? Let's be realistic with a dash of optimism.

 

#8 - Solomon Thomas DE Stanford

#40 - David Njoku TE Miami

#64 - Alvin Kamara RB Tennessee

#98 - Josh Jones SS N.C. State

 

Given my mind is constantly changing and it will probably change in a few minutes considering I don't address OL or WR but I'd like to get a feel for what the Huddle would like in the first 3 rounds. Kthnxbai.

 

 

#8 - Leonard Fournette RB LSU

#XX - Christian McCaffrey RB Standford

#98 - Jordan Leggett TE Clemson

#XX - Ryan Switzer WR N. Carolina

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Realistically, we're not getting Thomas. 

1 Fournette 

2 Barnett 

After that can't really pick specifics... Possible we would need to trade up for Barnett but otherwise I like Tanoh, some of the TEs, the centers from LSU and Ohio State, some wideouts, safeties like Obi and Jones though they would likely be gone. Also could be some unexpected droppers of good value there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Dex said:

Let's say there are no trade downs/trade ups and we are locked in at our picks. Who are your 4 selections through the first 3 rounds? Let's be realistic with a dash of optimism.

 

#8 - Solomon Thomas DE Stanford

#40 - David Njoku TE Miami

#64 - Alvin Kamara RB Tennessee

#98 - Josh Jones SS N.C. State

 

Given my mind is constantly changing and it will probably change in a few minutes considering I don't address OL or WR but I'd like to get a feel for what the Huddle would like in the first 3 rounds. Kthnxbai.

 

 

hell yeah.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Has anybody actually said anything of that sort? (if they did, I missed it) I get why some folks rely on stats. I don't, and honestly I'm not sure why people keep trying to convince me I should. (it ain't gonna happen) 😕 Consistency is my big thing too, and the lack of it is why I want to move on from Bryce. But again, that's an argument I make without denying that he can indeed play in (and yes, win) NFL games. Hating bad QB play is fine. Denying when you see good QB play is silly. Let's be real for a second... This may not be you specifically, but there are some folks for whom Bryce can do absolutely nothing to win their approval. Some are always gonna want a bigger / stronger / faster / more athletic (in some cases, Newtonesque) quarterback even if Bryce does start to play consistently. At that point, they'll just shift the argument from "we can't win with Bryce" to "well, we can't keep winning with Bryce" 😖 You know all this as well as I do. So again, I want to move on from Bryce as well. I'd happily (hell, merrily) keep him as a backup, but I doubt there's a realistic path to that happening. But no matter what, I'm gonna keep my debate points based in reality, and I'm not gonna be responsive to "he just sucks" level persuasion. Is any of that unreasonable? 🤔
    • Apples and oranges.   No one is coming for Jon Snow and the neutral party when they compliment Bruce when it is just normal talk about a game.  Which is the literal picture you are trying to paint above.  I mean that’s exactly what you argued. if you start a thread that is about the future of the franchise at QB going forward at QB and what we should do or are thinking! Yeah, the anti Bryce crowd is going to very vocal on that thread because the literal topic is extending Bryce and the future at QB (which is what an anti Bryce position is literally about.  Moving on.  The future) This thread? I literally called out people in their feelings wanting to make this about Bryce and their hurt feelings eroding over.  You can find where I literally calls them out go make another Bryce thread if they didn’t want to talk Saints and the most relevant thing about them.  And the thread went exactly as we all knew it would.   Bryce deserved player of the week talk for Atlanta.  I have always acknowledged his great games.  A shame there are only two 
    • Then the offense will be the same up and down underperforming offense they are this year and our FO are filled with idiots.
×
×
  • Create New...