Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ron Meeks


fignewty314

Recommended Posts

Meeks is our problem.The defense is not stopping anyone so we can't run the ball like we need to.Caldwell fired him,but let him save face by letting him resign,but our defense like it was ,was always was better than the Colts under Meeks.

defense stunk last year also. but Trgo > Meeks. That is why Meeks was option 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meeks is our problem.The defense is not stopping anyone so we can't run the ball like we need to.Caldwell fired him,but let him save face by letting him resign,but our defense like it was ,was always was better than the Colts under Meeks.

Isn't John Fox the HC?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey wait.....this isn't a unicorn farting post. We have become a bad influence on you figgy....sorry.

you are right,yall got me negative some now.but i've watched game four times now,and i've seen alot of things yall didn't see.Peppers over paid ass played good,we dominated game for around 45 to 46 minutes,we just lost on the scoreboard.you can't let any team have the ball 15 more minutes than you,bad things will happen to you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

defense stunk last year also. but Trgo > Meeks. That is why Meeks was option 2.

Has it come to this? Really? Propping up Trgo, no matter what the circumstance or comparison??

I swear to all that is holy, I never thought I would see this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meeks is our problem.The defense is not stopping anyone so we can't run the ball like we need to.Caldwell fired him,but let him save face by letting him resign,but our defense like it was ,was always was better than the Colts under Meeks.

It is a new defensive scheme and philosophy that is being played now. You can not expect immediate results. Check history- first season is a learning season, second season is where you see the marked results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has it come to this? Really? Propping up Trgo, no matter what the circumstance or comparison??

I swear to all that is holy, I never thought I would see this.

that wasn't "propping up" Trgo. 3 weeks didn't change anything. That isn't new. I wanted a new DC who would challenge and bring in new ideas. Meeks was the 2nd option for a reason. Trgo was decent, nothing to write home about under Fox but he put together some good units running a Fox defenese with the right pieces.

Ask any hardcore Colt fan the signature of a Meeks run defense....also, most Indy fans don't follow Carolina but many I have spoken to saw it as a sign of desperation that Fox (who has always been thought of as a defensive guy) would bring in Meeks. I was never apart of that group on the board who painted an unrealistic picture of what Meeks was gonna do. We can still win with him........but he was never an upgrade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is a new defensive scheme and philosophy that is being played now. You can not expect immediate results. Check history- first season is a learning season, second season is where you see the marked results.

yeah, tell that to the 3-0 Jets.......they aren't following the blueprint. Also, teams that go 12-4......aren't suppose to take a year off to work on one side of the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah, tell that to the 3-0 Jets.......they aren't following the blueprint. Also, teams that go 12-4......aren't suppose to take a year off to work on one side of the ball.

The Jets have a new Head Coach. That is entirely different from just having a new coordinator with a new scheme.

I would not say that the team is taking a year off, by any means. I see the guys out there fighting and sweating on Sundays, so I wouldn't say that in the least... except maybe for Peppers. The defense is in the application phase of the learning process. Just keep the faith.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure 19 is too high for Rodriguez anymore.  He looks to be moving up boards, but it could be smokescreens.  
    • I see XL this way---great athlete.  Good person.  When we drafted him, we knew he was raw.  One year of WR in college (starting) and in HS, he was a QB, I believe. We knew we would need patience with him.  I think year 3 will be make or break.  He is older, and I think that people with his athletic ability have always been better than those with less---but those with less can become more successful.  Why is that?  in my view, it is mental. XL can learn the mechanics and nuances of playing WR if he becomes focused on it and works at it.  I had the opportunity to talk to Armanti Edwards one day after OTAs (great guy) and he discussed how overwhelming it was.  He seemed shocked.  At that time, I knew that Fox hated the pick (I heard him mock Armanti to another coach when he saw Edwards drop a punt from a jugs machine--then I saw Armanti look back at Fox as if to suggest that he was feeling the pressure to please the coach. We forget that these are kids in their early 20s.  At the time, Fox was a lame duck.  Remember when he had Clausen as the #3 QB and was forced to move him up the ladder?  I liked Fox, but I think the climate and culture was influenced by the politics.  Currently, I see another Wr from SC who is struggling, but he is ina  very nurturing, positive culture. Let's see what happens with XL.  I am frustrated too---but XL was a second round talent who was raw and we traded up to get him.  He had 500 yards as a rookie--lets call 2025 a sophomore slump and see if we can't get at least 50 yards per game out of him.  If not, cut bait.
    • Sadiq feels like a lazy comp.  Sure he would be a big improvement over what we have but at a position we don't and maybe can't (midget qb) utilize.  I hope the staff puts together a list of players you automatically take at 19 (Freeling, Lemon, Downs, Faulk) and if none are there, trade back to look at (Thieneman, McNeil-Warren, Proctor, Lomu, Allen, Iheanachor, Banks, Woods).  I get the people that think an OT would be a waste because we temporarily patched that hole, and ILB and safety are a waste because that is high to take those particular positions, but by trading back we get extra picks to fill every need.  A draft that has an OT, S, ILB, slot WR, and C would really put us in a good position moving forward if we get an extra first three rounds additional pick.   
×
×
  • Create New...